Skip to comments.ISIL's Syria push 'a political disaster' according to Al Qaeda leader
Posted on 05/03/2014 8:50:46 AM PDT by DeaconBenjamin
Iraqi Al Qaeda's entry into Syria's civil war caused "a political disaster" for Islamist militants there, the movement's global leader Ayman al-Zawahri said in a video message, urging the faction to redouble its efforts in Iraq instead.
Zawahri has repeatedly tried to end infighting between the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and another Al Qaeda-aligned group, the Nusra Front.
He said on May 2 in a message translated by SITE Monitoring that if ISIL had accepted his decision not to get involved in Syria and had instead worked to "busy itself with Iraq, which needs double its efforts" then it could have avoided the "waterfall of blood" caused by militant infighting.
ISIL militants joined the conflict in Syria last year and unilaterally declared they were taking over the Nusra Front, which had won the admiration of many rebels fighting Syria's President Bashar al-Assad for its battlefield prowess.
Zawahri, who has run Al Qaeda since Osama bin Laden was killed in April 2011, accused ISIL's leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, of "sedition" and said rebel disunity had been handed "on a plate of gold" to Assad, the ultimate target of all Sunni Islamist groups in Syria.
Zawahri said Baghdadi should instead redouble his efforts against the Iraqi government, led by Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki who is a Shi'ite - an Islamic sect regarded by Al Qaeda as heretical. Shi'ism is the dominant sect in Iran.
He said that toppling Assad would "cause the elimination of more than half of the Iranian power alliance that seeks to establish a Shi'ite state from Afghanistan to south Lebanon."
On April 30, the United States said Al Qaeda's core organisation in Pakistan, led by Zawahri, had been severely degraded, but that the movement's affiliates in Africa and the Middle East were becoming more autonomous and aggressive.
So which group is Obama and McCain arming?
Whoever burns the most churches.
I think Al-Nusra ought to go into Iraq and takeover the ISIL. That would stirs things up.
> Zawahri, who has run Al Qaeda since Osama bin Laden was killed in April 2011, accused ISIL’s leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, of “sedition” and said rebel disunity had been handed “on a plate of gold” to Assad, the ultimate target of all Sunni Islamist groups in Syria... He said that toppling Assad would “cause the elimination of more than half of the Iranian power alliance that seeks to establish a Shi’ite state from Afghanistan to south Lebanon.”
Sounds like the Judean Peoples Front vs The Peoples Front of Judea.....SPLITTERS!
Good choice to highlight.
For some reason, the words “food fight” come to mind.
I am not familiar with your reference.
It’s almost as if ISIL’s being used as useful idiots are wont to be used.
Do it some more!
Except they went too far and our Air Force and others are taking them out without the ‘CINC’s approval.
They forced a coup... and may it proliferate.
Why are we STILL on the wrong side of the fight to save civilization?
After having world wide evidence of exactly what happens to minority populations once overtaken by ISIS, can any government on this planet have a right to criticise measures Assad may take to protect his Alawites?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.