Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Moves To Bypass Obama, Approve Keystone Pipeline
Fox Nation ^ | 5/5/2014 | Richard Berkow

Posted on 05/05/2014 5:37:33 AM PDT by thackney

The vote to authorize immediate construction of the controversial Keystone XL Pipeline may come to a crucial head next week, as two Senators introduced a bill on Thursday calling for binding legislation.

(Excerpt) Read more at nation.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Montana; US: Nebraska; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: energy; keystone; keystonepipeline; keystonexl; oil; pipeline; senatebill

1 posted on 05/05/2014 5:37:34 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Keystone pipeline issue looms as Senate takes up energy bill
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/keystone-pipeline-issue-looms-as-senate-takes-up-energy-bill/2014/05/04/ac262964-d21a-11e3-a6b1-45c4dffb85a6_story.html

GOP leaders have pushed to get an amendment on the Shaheen-Portman bill that would allow them to simply mandate the construction of the pipeline, overriding the ongoing review by the State Department as it considers how to handle 2.5 million public comments on the proposal and an ongoing lawsuit in Nebraska trying to alter the route. That review, with a further delay announced two weeks ago, seems certain to last past November and possibly into next year.

Reid offered Republicans a separate vote on a bill that would be a clean Keystone vote, nothing else, requiring 60 votes to overcome the filibuster of liberal senators opposed to the proposal. “The key then is getting 60 votes,” Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.), the co-sponsor with Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) of the Keystone amendment, told reporters Thursday.

Landrieu is chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee and one of the most endangered incumbents seeking reelection this fall.

By the end of the week, Hoeven said he had not secured at least 60 votes, to some degree because of the confusion surrounding whether it would be part of the Shaheen-Portman bill or a freestanding vote. Some Democrats who have previously supported the bill have been hesitant to support a Keystone amendment, out of fear that Obama would veto the entire package because of the controversial measure, torpedoing the underlying energy legislation.


2 posted on 05/05/2014 5:39:10 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Schumer was on the tube this morning talking about working a deal on the minimum wage by tying it with the Keystone approval. A deal like that wouldn’t surprise me. The question then becomes will the House go along and if they do then will Obama vetoe it?


3 posted on 05/05/2014 5:41:06 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

They figure they can support this because OZero will vero it anyway.


4 posted on 05/05/2014 5:43:15 AM PDT by Ingtar (The NSA - "We're the only part of government who actually listens to the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The key is getting 66+ votes who will stick to override the veto.


5 posted on 05/05/2014 5:44:19 AM PDT by Ingtar (The NSA - "We're the only part of government who actually listens to the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
re: a deal, minimum wage raise tied to Keystone Pipeline.

Only if Obama does not have the ability to veto one part but not the other. And if the jobs created have to go to US citizens.

The question is how many democratic US Senators in the pro- real energy states are up for re-election. (how did I become so cynical?)

6 posted on 05/05/2014 5:47:42 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Lemme guess... led by soon to be ex senators Landreau, Pryor, Begitch and Hagan.


7 posted on 05/05/2014 5:47:52 AM PDT by CPT Clay (Follow me on Twitter @Clay N TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

How much money is the little slimy corrupt crook droopy pants reid going to get to line his pockets?


8 posted on 05/05/2014 5:50:05 AM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

http://topconservativenews.com/2012/01/soros-buffet-to-profit-off-obama-keystone-veto/


9 posted on 05/05/2014 5:51:33 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I don’t think they cab do it. It takes Presidential approval and I don’t believe they can override his disapproval. In other words, Obama is the last word.


10 posted on 05/05/2014 5:53:02 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

I agree.


11 posted on 05/05/2014 5:53:42 AM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thackney

That is just for show and to fool the sheep. In other words, an election trick, along the line of the Republicans shouting, “Elect me and I will defund obamacare!” Once the election is over, it is promptly forgotten.


12 posted on 05/05/2014 5:56:39 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“I don’t think they cab do it. It takes Presidential approval and I don’t believe they can override his disapproval.”

I was kind of wondering about that. There are thousands of pipelines in the US. Was presidential approval needed for all of them?


13 posted on 05/05/2014 5:57:01 AM PDT by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Schumer wants to put the turd on the GOP plate...no matter how it plays out!


14 posted on 05/05/2014 6:00:29 AM PDT by SMARTY ("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Obama might let it go through telling the moonbats his hands were tide then taking credit for the economic boost.


15 posted on 05/05/2014 6:03:39 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Harry Reid will find a way to ditch this in File 13 along with everything else.


16 posted on 05/05/2014 6:07:47 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepers

Are you part of the 41 percent?

2nd+Qtr+FReepathon

Click the Pic
Donate today


Support Free Republic

17 posted on 05/05/2014 6:09:59 AM PDT by deoetdoctrinae (Gun-free zones are playgrounds for felons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
I'd be suspicious of any “override” vote called by the Donks. They are all on Barry's side. Most of this is a distraction for the upcoming mid terms...
18 posted on 05/05/2014 6:28:57 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Waaay past time for that to happen.


19 posted on 05/05/2014 6:45:05 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Fine, make him veto it.


20 posted on 05/05/2014 6:48:00 AM PDT by ryan71 (The Partisans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Will Harry Reid even allow it to go up for a vote?


21 posted on 05/05/2014 6:49:46 AM PDT by spiderfern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage

When crossing the US border the State Department must approve. Effectively, that requires Presidential Approval.


22 posted on 05/05/2014 6:50:30 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Has Obama had to veto anything? Reid doesn’t let much non crony communist stuff get past him.


23 posted on 05/05/2014 6:53:15 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Liberty or Big Government - you can't have both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

That’s right — make obama veto it, then make the Democrat Socialists in the Senate vote to uphold the veto — right before the election when the Democrat Socialists are out talking about jobs and such — trying to sound conservative — to hold onto their seats.


24 posted on 05/05/2014 6:54:35 AM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: grania
Only if Obama does not have the ability to veto one part but not the other. And if the jobs created have to go to US citizens.

He doesn't have a line item veto so he'd have to sign it or veto the entire thing.

25 posted on 05/05/2014 6:56:12 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Could he (Obama) put the minimum wage in effect but tie up the pipeline with agencies and out-of-control judges?

If something has Schummer's name on it, there has to be a behind-the-scenes way to have it their way only.

26 posted on 05/05/2014 6:59:51 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sport

You read my mind


27 posted on 05/05/2014 7:01:39 AM PDT by goodnesswins (R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Some Democrats like Hoven and Landrieu are scared to death of the voter backlash to come in November.


28 posted on 05/05/2014 7:44:56 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

They should be, but let us hope they don’t take it serious before then.


29 posted on 05/05/2014 7:53:46 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Obama has been holding onto Keystone as an extortion bargaining chip for something really big. Is minimum wage going to be big enough to get him DNC votes? That’s a big bargaining chip. I’m not sure min-wage is gonna do it.


30 posted on 05/05/2014 7:56:27 AM PDT by Ms. Blunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ms. Blunt

I think both sides are milking it for fund raising.


31 posted on 05/05/2014 8:05:36 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage

No...It’s only because another nation is involved, i.e., the line is crossing the USA/Canada border.


32 posted on 05/05/2014 8:46:44 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: grania

Schumer is pretending again...The President holds the card...well...let’s put it another way...Soros holds the card...


33 posted on 05/05/2014 8:49:17 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CPT Clay

The first thing I thought was which senators up for reelection are sponsoring this. What a shame that these people don’t make a move unless and until their election campaign is in trouble.


34 posted on 05/05/2014 8:53:02 AM PDT by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: uncitizen

Call it leverage


35 posted on 05/07/2014 5:25:23 AM PDT by CPT Clay (Follow me on Twitter @Clay N TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson