Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan
Most here understand the 2d clearly recognized and protected our preexisting right to bear arms, and was thought an essential element for ratification of the proposed Constitution.

Clearly, that recognition and protection seems to be slipping away.

D.C. v Keller (the right to bear within one’s home, limited to federal enclaves) was a 5/4 decision.

McDonald v. Chicago, which extended “within the home” to the states, was a 5/4 decision.

Those are close calls under any view.

11 posted on 05/05/2014 9:58:17 AM PDT by frog in a pot (The 2dA didn't grant a right - it preserved an existing right in order to obtain ratification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: frog in a pot

just about anything that upholds the constitution is a 5-4 decision these days. not good.


15 posted on 05/05/2014 10:18:24 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson