Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three Lesbian Women ‘Marry’ Each Other, Claim to Be World’s First ‘Throuple’
Christian News Network ^ | May 5, 2014

Posted on 05/06/2014 2:41:10 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

MASSACHUSETTS – Three women in Massachusetts claim they are the world’s first lesbian ‘throuple,’ after they all exchanged wedding vows and ‘married’ each other last year.

Brynn, Doll, and Kitten are three women who range in age from 27 to 34. Last August, they organized a wedding-style ceremony, in which they entered into a threesome “marriage” union.

Even though Massachusetts recognizes same-sex “marriages,” polygamy is illegal. However, that did not deter Brynn, Doll, and Kitten from entering into a three-way relationship.

“In our eyes we are married,” Brynn told The Sun newspaper. “We had specialist lawyers draw up paperwork so our assets are equally divided.”

The three women recognized that their union is possibly unprecedented.

“As far as we know, there aren’t any other three women who are married like us,” Doll told the Daily Mail.

Doll says she has considered herself to be polygamous since high school.

“I had always dated girls, who—although they had boyfriends or girlfriends—were also allowed to date me,” she stated. “I never thought that much about it and I had never really come out as poly to my friends and family. To me, it was just how I was.”

Brynn describes their relationship as a “romantic committee,” where the household responsibilities are allocated between the three of them. Nevertheless, she says that she and her two partners are “very traditional people” and “perfectly normal.”

“Doll, Kitten, and I may not be the norm but we are perfectly normal,” she claims. “We are simply people trying to live the life that we feel is best for us and we deserve the rights afforded to others.”

According to the three women, they would like to raise children by using anonymous sperm donors. They say they want three children—one for each of them.

“We always joke that the children should never outnumber the parents,” Brynn says.

Massachusetts officials say they will not reprimand the three women for their polygamous relationship.

As previously reported, non-traditional marriage and parenting structures are becoming increasingly common, with contract-based “co-parenting” especially on the rise. Late last year, a federal judge struck down part of Utah’s polygamy ban as unconstitutional.

Experts have long warned of the societal consequences of non-Biblical “marriage” models. In an article published last December, Ken Klukowski of the Center for Religious Liberty explains that the legalization of homosexuality opens the door to polygamy.

“If government cannot forbid homosexual conduct, this argument goes, then neither can it deny those who define themselves by homosexual behavior to officially recognize any such relationship as a marriage,” Klukowski wrote. “It began a religious and philosophical debate in America between two different definitions of marriage and family.”

“The new conception of marriage, rooted in the proliferation of no-fault divorce laws in the 1970s and the sexual revolution, is that marriage is about personal happiness and fulfillment,” he continued. “People should be free to form whatever relationships they find personally satisfying and to follow whatever their personal sexual inclinations are to engage in whatever form of sexual behavior they find gratifying.”

“If, therefore, you have a right to officially recognize those homosexual relationships through redefining marriage to include same-sex couples, then there is no reason to say it cannot include more than two people, so long as everyone is a consenting adult,” Klukowski proposed. “The exact legal arguments for same-sex marriage equally apply to multiple-person marriages.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; lesbianism; massachusetts; polygamy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-64 next last

1 posted on 05/06/2014 2:41:10 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

she says that she and her two partners are “very traditional people” and “perfectly normal.”

Yes, in some alternate universe


2 posted on 05/06/2014 2:43:18 PM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

See also...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;q=quick;s=throuple


3 posted on 05/06/2014 2:43:26 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Support Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Throw-upple is more like it!....................


4 posted on 05/06/2014 2:45:17 PM PDT by Red Badger (Soon there will be another American Civil War. Will make the first one seem like a Tea Party........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Wait, I thought they were going to stop redefining marriage after the first redefinition?


5 posted on 05/06/2014 2:45:24 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

A brief pause down the slippery slope.


6 posted on 05/06/2014 2:45:39 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Brynn, Doll, and Kitten

Stripper names?

7 posted on 05/06/2014 2:45:48 PM PDT by Veggie Todd (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Here come the brides:


8 posted on 05/06/2014 2:46:47 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Why can’t entire communes form one *marriage*? One or two of them can claim the rest as dependents.


9 posted on 05/06/2014 2:47:21 PM PDT by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I can’t wait to see someone with a lesbian lawyer try to marry a goat.


10 posted on 05/06/2014 2:47:26 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m living in Sodom & Gommorrah...please, Lord, beam me up.


11 posted on 05/06/2014 2:49:35 PM PDT by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
“The exact legal arguments for same-sex marriage equally apply to multiple-person marriages.”

I see they are at least finally being honest about their true intentions.

12 posted on 05/06/2014 2:49:58 PM PDT by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

>>I can’t wait to see someone with a lesbian lawyer try to marry a goat.<<

the president already did it — no lesbian needed.


13 posted on 05/06/2014 2:50:00 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Fight Tapinophobia in all its forms! Do not submit to arduus privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 5thGenTexan

14 posted on 05/06/2014 2:51:08 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They are witches also aren’t they?


15 posted on 05/06/2014 2:51:47 PM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug
I can’t wait to see someone with a lesbian lawyer try to marry a goat.

It's probably already happened in Rio Linda.

16 posted on 05/06/2014 2:51:48 PM PDT by Veggie Todd (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FES0844

I think you just insulted the people of Sodom & Gommorrah.


17 posted on 05/06/2014 2:52:21 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Revolting cat!
3 women? They'll find some way to make this relationship work.


18 posted on 05/06/2014 2:53:14 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Must be a time warp by exactly three hours by the same FReeper. Weee Wooo, Weee Wooo.


19 posted on 05/06/2014 2:54:32 PM PDT by shove_it (long ago Orwell and Rand warned us of Obama's America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t see how these women can be denied marriage under the current jurisprudence. Scalia predicted this would happen.


20 posted on 05/06/2014 2:54:54 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

Wouldn’t you say this is bigamy though?

They sure get upset when folks in Utah try that.


21 posted on 05/06/2014 2:56:54 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Nah, they’re incapable of being insulted or shamed.


22 posted on 05/06/2014 2:57:37 PM PDT by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

Surely some LIEberal, leftist hack of a judge will rule that they all can be married as a basic human right.


23 posted on 05/06/2014 3:01:27 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

24 posted on 05/06/2014 3:02:08 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Stalin Blamed The Kulaks,Obama Blames The Tea Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Three Lesbian Women ‘Marry’ Each Other...

Hmmmm, I thought this was the opening line of a joke you can tell in polite circles.


25 posted on 05/06/2014 3:03:13 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I think the Utah people eventually win too. There is no principled distinction between gay and poly marriage in the Supreme Court cases. There is only tradition which was ignored by the Court in throwing traditional marriage aside.


26 posted on 05/06/2014 3:04:17 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Veggie Todd

If you think their lesbo ‘marriage-a-trois’ is a legal mess wait until the divorce happens. Can they divorce one and keep the other? Ehehehehehe. Immoral fools....


27 posted on 05/06/2014 3:05:06 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t get it. How do you tell the difference between a Lesbian Throuple and a Lesbian Orgy? Is it that the Throuple has less sex since they are “married”?


28 posted on 05/06/2014 3:07:09 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

I don’t disagree. I just find it strange that the same government who wanted to raid homes to stop heterosexuals from practicing bigamy, have no problem with this.

I don’t like any of this, but the really big deal will be when someone files a license naming Fido on one of the lines.


29 posted on 05/06/2014 3:09:18 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Veggie Todd

The whole thing is a bid for a reality TV show or similar stunt.


30 posted on 05/06/2014 3:10:34 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (FIGHT! FIGHT! SEVERE CONSERVATIVE AND THE WILD RIGHT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FES0844

I’m living in Sodom & Gommorrah...please, Lord, beam me up.

**************

That is not how it works. You flee, and don’t look back. Don’t get drunk afterwards either.


31 posted on 05/06/2014 3:12:12 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (FIGHT! FIGHT! SEVERE CONSERVATIVE AND THE WILD RIGHT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

32 posted on 05/06/2014 3:13:45 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

Something fishy about this story.


33 posted on 05/06/2014 3:15:29 PM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
I think when the time comes around to register the new words coined in 2014, the term "throuple" should be submitted as a synonym for "vomit" (n)
34 posted on 05/06/2014 3:18:00 PM PDT by mikrofon ('s wordplay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DAC21

“Something fishy about this story.”

Yes a very “candid”-a story about modern love in the Bay State.


35 posted on 05/06/2014 3:22:27 PM PDT by mdmathis6 (It was never Bush's fault...Spock's messing with red matter was what screwed us all up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well it did not take Obama long to destroy traditional marriage.


36 posted on 05/06/2014 3:26:30 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

That dude in the middle.


37 posted on 05/06/2014 3:29:52 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Gonna divorce my wife and marry my father-in-law in the end so we can avoid inheritance taxes.....


38 posted on 05/06/2014 3:30:50 PM PDT by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

I thought the same thing.


39 posted on 05/06/2014 3:32:43 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Wonder when some federal judge will step in and make these arrangements legal? Before or after the mid-term elections?


40 posted on 05/06/2014 3:33:24 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No telling.


41 posted on 05/06/2014 3:35:19 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“We had specialist lawyers draw up paperwork so our asses are equally divided.”

Sorry I couldn’t resist!


42 posted on 05/06/2014 3:36:21 PM PDT by Rock N Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

The Witches of Eastwick?


43 posted on 05/06/2014 3:37:59 PM PDT by ABN 505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ABN 505

That one in the middle though ;^)


44 posted on 05/06/2014 3:43:18 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They think they are a First??? Guess they have not been to Utah. Maybe they should turn on their TV and watch the show about the Mormon guy with the 5 wives.


45 posted on 05/06/2014 3:45:54 PM PDT by CdMGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Thruple?

Rien de nouveau.


46 posted on 05/06/2014 3:47:24 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
What a touching love story. It sure warms the cockles of your heart!

Is this known as a "Lesbian sandwich"? Which lucky bride gets the middle on their blessed wedding night?

47 posted on 05/06/2014 3:50:17 PM PDT by Gritty (Gun controllers aren't afraid of guns but a country where the individual has power-Dan Greenfield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CdMGuy
They think they are a First??? Guess they have not been to Utah. Maybe they should turn on their TV and watch the show about the Mormon guy with the 5 wives.

In that case, though, the "wives" are individually "married" to the man, they aren't all claiming to be "married" to each other, are they?

48 posted on 05/06/2014 4:04:58 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Now for the dash to be the first to marry (1) what and (2) how many. Thank the homosexual activists who broke the damn.


49 posted on 05/06/2014 4:21:48 PM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

I never thought the three words “frenching a grasshopper” would ever come together in a thought sentence.


50 posted on 05/06/2014 4:23:43 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson