Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coming End to Racial Preferences
Townhall.com ^ | May 7, 2014 | Waltewr E. Williams

Posted on 05/07/2014 7:03:36 AM PDT by Kaslin

Last week's U.S. Supreme Court 6-2 ruling in Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action et al. upheld Michigan's constitutional amendment that bans racial preferences in admission to its public universities. Justice Sonia Sotomayor lashed out at her colleagues in a bitter dissent, calling them "out of touch with reality." She went on to make the incredible argument that the amendment, which explicitly forbids racial discrimination, itself amounts to racial discrimination. Her argument was that permissible "race-sensitive admissions policies," the new name for racial preferences, both serve the compelling interest of obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body and inure people to the benefit of racial minorities. By the way, no one has come up with hard evidence of the supposed "educational benefits" that come from a racially mixed student body, and there's mounting evidence of harm done to minorities through academic mismatching.

Far more important than the legal battles over racial preferences in college admissions is the question of why they are being called for in the first place. The SAT's purpose is to predict how well a student will perform in college classes. Blacks score at least 100 points lower than whites in each of the assessment areas -- critical reading, math and writing. Asians score higher than whites in math and writing. SAT scores are also reported for Mexican-Americans, Puerto Ricans, Indians and others. Blacks score lower than these minorities, who themselves score lower than whites and Asians.

If we reject the racist notion of mental inferiority of blacks, holding that blacks can never compete academically and that "racially sensitive" college admissions are needed in perpetuity, we must seek an explanation for their relatively poor academic performance. My longtime colleague and friend Dr. Thomas Sowell offers some evidence in a recent column, "Will Dunbar Rise Again?" (http://tinyurl.com/mjt39ks). Paul Laurence Dunbar High School was founded in 1870 as the first public high school in the nation for black students. As far back as 1899, when tests were given in Washington's four academic high schools, Dunbar students scored higher than students in two of the three white high schools. Over the first several decades of the 20th century, about 80 percent of Dunbar graduates went on to college, a percentage far greater than that of high-school graduates of any race in the country at large at the time. Most blacks went to inexpensive local colleges, but among those who went on to Ivy League and other elite colleges, a significant number graduated Phi Beta Kappa. At one time, Dunbar graduates were admitted to Dartmouth or Harvard without having to take an entrance exam. One would have to be a lunatic to chalk up this academic success, in the early to mid-1900s, to Sotomayor's "race-sensitive admissions policies."

The shame of the nation is that poor black children are trapped in terrible schools. But worse than that is that white liberals, black politicians and civil rights leaders, perhaps unwittingly, have taken steps to ensure that black children remain trapped. Sowell says, "Of all the cynical frauds of the Obama administration, few are so despicable as sacrificing the education of poor and minority children to the interests of the teachers' unions." Attorney General Eric Holder's hostility, along with that of the teachers unions, toward the spread of charter schools is just one of the signs of that cynicism. Holder's threats against schools that discipline more black students than he thinks they should add official support to a hostile learning environment.

The weakening of racial preferences in college admissions can be beneficial if it can focus our attention on the causes of the huge gap in academic achievement between blacks and whites and Asians. Worrying about what happens when blacks are trying to get in to college is too late -- as a matter of fact 12 years late.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; college; colleges; education; supremecourt

1 posted on 05/07/2014 7:03:36 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

http://topconservativenews.com/2014/04/black-female-debate-team-named-national-champions-to-make-up-for-white-privilege/

Look at this video of these black women debate ‘winners’. This is the Affirmative Action end game. Whites or Asians can research, prepare, rehearse all they want to, but if a black team shows up, they lose. From now on all subjective contests will be awarded to anyone who can show up and be black.


2 posted on 05/07/2014 7:10:13 AM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m not suggesting an all black school but I do know from having attended an all girl’s school for two years, that I felt freer to learn in that environment. The only class I took with boys was physics. I got 100%s on my standardized tests but scored around C+ on the labs, probably because I was flirting with the guys. It probably didn’t help either that our instructor was a cloistered brother back in the early 60s when that meant he really was not supposed to talk to women at all. Fun times.


3 posted on 05/07/2014 7:12:19 AM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin



4 posted on 05/07/2014 7:18:58 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

We have all-black schools. They are in areas where civilization has ended and all the other races have fled.
They are not exactly shining citadels of achievement.


5 posted on 05/07/2014 7:19:17 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Race-based preferences are illegal, wrong, and unconstitutional. Any law that “allows” them is invalid. That applies to “racial set-asides” in government contracting, or preferred minority business status as well.


6 posted on 05/07/2014 8:43:33 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl

Of all the things that have made me despondent about the future of the country and the possibility of blacks joining the rest of the country, watching that execrable exhibition was easily won of the worst. And the craven, cowardly officials who allowed that farce to go beyond the elementary stage should be ashamed. But the bigger shame is that they’re not ashamed. It makes the whole country look like fools to give awards to those morons.


7 posted on 05/07/2014 8:49:01 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“”Coming End to Racial Preferences””

That’s a good start but something tells me the races for whom preferences are afforded will not think so.

In addition we need to eradicate all race based political and lobbying groups.

Let’s see where we really fall on ‘race relations’. I’d bet as bad as they are now they can and will get much worse.


8 posted on 05/07/2014 8:50:53 AM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

9 posted on 05/07/2014 8:52:53 AM PDT by IamConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson