Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chuck Schumer: Let's amend the Constitution so Congress can restrict free speech
Cain TV.com ^ | May 7, 2014 | Dan Calabrese

Posted on 05/09/2014 10:43:01 AM PDT by Kaslin

More reining in of freedom.

Oh those New York Democrats! First we have Hillary (OK, only a New Yorker in a carpetbagging sort of way, but still . . .) wanting to "rein in" our notions that we have real Second Amendment rights. But that's the Second Amendment. That's not as important as the First, right? So for that one, we need Chuck Schumer, Hillary's senior as a senator before and after her tenure, to launch the attack.

And he is:

The Supreme Court's Citizens United decision allowing unions and corporations to donate to independent political groups has driven liberals to such fits that they now want to amend the First Amendment. At a Senate Rules Committee meeting last week, New York Democrat Chuck Schumer announced a proposal to amend the Constitution to empower government to regulate political speech.

"The Supreme Court is trying to take this country back to the days of the robber barons, allowing dark money to flood our elections," Mr. Schumer said. The Senate will vote this year on the amendment to "once and for all allow Congress to make laws to regulate our system, without the risk of them being eviscerated by a conservative Supreme Court." He even rolled out retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens to pronounce his unhappiness with freedom's bedrock document.

According to the text of the proposed revision to James Madison's 1791 handiwork, sponsored by New Mexico Senator Tom Udall, the states and federal government would have the power to regulate the "raising and spending of money" through a wide range of means "to advance the fundamental principle of political equality for all."

A Chuck Schumer attack on free speech is hardly a big surprise. He's one of the senators who goaded the IRS into going after Tea Party groups based on the rationale that they were undermining confidence in government. Oh no, not that!

To amend the Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of each house of Congress and the ratification of 38 states. That is not going to happen. But that doesn't mean there's nothing to be concerned about here. When a U.S. senator is willing to be so brazen as to propose we amend the Constitution to weaken the First Amendment - and specifically to empower Congress to restrict free speech - what that really tells us is where the political landscape stands. Not long ago it would have been inconceivable that mainstream politician hoping to remain in office would propose to take away basic First Amendment rights for the purpose of empowering politicians to impose new restrictions on same. At least in the reading of Sen. Schumer and others who back this proposed amendment, the political landscape has changed and it is now possible to propose such a thing without being flogged by the voters as a result.

This is all cloaked, of course, in language about "dark money" and so forth. You know what that's about, right? What has been the leading Democrat theme this year? It's sure as hell not how wonderful ObamaCare is. It's attacking the diabolical Koch Brothers. Democrats have decided to turn major donors to conservative causes and candidates into objects of public disdain, and they don't like it when they can't do so. They also don't like it when they can't put any restrictions on such individuals, groups or corporations.

But the Constitution was not written for the political protection of incumbent politicians. It was written to protect the rights of the people who have to live under the governance of such people. If that's creating problems for Chuck Schumer, then I'd say it's doing exactly what it was supposed to do. I hope enough of the citizenry still understands that sufficient to recognize what an obscene power grab Schumer and his allies are attempting.


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: 1sta; 1stamendment; chuckschumer; schumer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last
Hey Chuckie, how about yours
1 posted on 05/09/2014 10:43:01 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m now of the opinion that Schmuckie needs to be throttled.


2 posted on 05/09/2014 10:43:57 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Who’s that guy on the right?


3 posted on 05/09/2014 10:44:52 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Schumer has body odor.


4 posted on 05/09/2014 10:45:18 AM PDT by YourAdHere (I flip off all Obama bumper stickers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Chuck Schumer has always been utterly evil, a man who does Satan’s bidding, and he hates freedom of any kind.


5 posted on 05/09/2014 10:46:22 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m surprised that, based on the SC decision that corporations can be considered as and “individual”, these barbarians haven’t used that definition to force them to “buy” health insurance for their employees. Since the law requires all “individuals” to have health care why not make the corporations buy health care?


6 posted on 05/09/2014 10:48:12 AM PDT by raybbr (Obamacare needs a death panel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

That photo - four faces of evil.


7 posted on 05/09/2014 10:48:26 AM PDT by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Those marxists see the Constitution as an obstacle to steamrolling this country into marxism.


8 posted on 05/09/2014 10:49:55 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ohhhhhh dark money. Was there any reference to money raised by the campaigner-in-chief nonstop money schmoozing tour in Cali with 4 34k-62k a plate dinners for Schumie and his minions ? That kind of dark money ?


9 posted on 05/09/2014 10:51:36 AM PDT by redcatcherb412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Free expression by a corporation should be curtailed, but they are still required to pay taxes and and subject to government regulations. I suppose they are expected to just shut up, bend over and take it.


10 posted on 05/09/2014 10:52:05 AM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois.


11 posted on 05/09/2014 10:52:29 AM PDT by HOYA97 (twitter @hoya97)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

The guy on the right is Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of NY.


12 posted on 05/09/2014 10:52:59 AM PDT by shove_it (long ago Orwell and Rand warned us of Obama's America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Dark money sounds racist.

Off with his head!


13 posted on 05/09/2014 10:54:05 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Schumer, Schumer,
We need you like a TUMOR.

c2005 ,”The 21st Century So far” by LTOS.


14 posted on 05/09/2014 10:55:32 AM PDT by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

I think that’s Durbin


15 posted on 05/09/2014 10:55:52 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

You know seventy years ago those comments would be treasonous and he would be thrown in jail. Why are they not now?


16 posted on 05/09/2014 10:56:28 AM PDT by 7thOF7th (Righteousness is our cause and justice will prevail!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Freedom of thought has always been a threat to Marxism. He only wishes they could have showers and ovens.

Pray America wakes up


17 posted on 05/09/2014 10:57:22 AM PDT by bray (The Republic of Texas 2022 is here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The left is being so brazen because they believe (and I’m afraid that they may be correct) that none of these proposals will ever be turned against them, because one way or another, they are never going to be out of power again. By which I mean, even if the GOPe should take the White House or a Congressional majority, they will be no threat to the leftward ratchet of America.

I don’t believe there is ever going to be a truly conservative American majority again, therefore never a truly conservative President or Congressional majority. We are too far down the rabbit hole, and academia at every level, plus the media, is only indoctrinating future generations-the majority of them, at any rate-to be ever more statist. The only “freedom” they will be trained to desire will be the “freedom” to be licentious.

As in the days of decadent Rome, bread and circuses. But they’re indoctrinated to think that they are so “free” when they “occupy”, scream for more freebies, and live the hook-up lifestyle. While they’re nothing but lab rats or government serfs.


18 posted on 05/09/2014 11:05:26 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

No that’s Patty Murray of WA. Kirsten Gillebrand is the other senator from NY


19 posted on 05/09/2014 11:06:54 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 43north

You said it


20 posted on 05/09/2014 11:07:32 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 7thOF7th

Good point


21 posted on 05/09/2014 11:09:15 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bray

“wake up” no longer garners any response. “Pull your head out” seems to work these days, and it describes the condition of the general populace.


22 posted on 05/09/2014 11:11:36 AM PDT by caprock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I will support and defend the Constitution against All Enemies foreign or Domestic!

Chuck Boy that’s you a Domestic Enemy.

23 posted on 05/09/2014 11:15:16 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I have a better idea: let’s amend the Constitution so killing idiots like Chucky Schmucky is legal.


24 posted on 05/09/2014 11:16:04 AM PDT by Fledermaus (Conseravtives are all that's left to defend the Constitution. Dems hate it, and Repubs don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 43north

Would be a great time for a 12’x12’ asteroid to come through the roof with those four assembled.


25 posted on 05/09/2014 11:18:08 AM PDT by mothball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Here ya go Chuckie, here’s one that is a better fit for you-

http://www.memo.ru/library/books/sw/chapt43.htm


26 posted on 05/09/2014 11:20:21 AM PDT by matthew fuller (No, I don't miss GWB- I miss Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7thOF7th

Because the traitorous leaches have infected every level of our society.


27 posted on 05/09/2014 11:20:35 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Thats "It's Pat" Murray! lol


28 posted on 05/09/2014 11:20:52 AM PDT by Fledermaus (Conseravtives are all that's left to defend the Constitution. Dems hate it, and Repubs don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’ve got a better idea: Let’s pass a bill of attainder against Schmuck Schumer.


29 posted on 05/09/2014 11:23:00 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What about unions who use public funds to support Commie candidates and give the most of all groups?

Soros, Hollywood, foreign terrorists, Chinese?

Chuckles is a card-carrying Marxist...


30 posted on 05/09/2014 11:23:13 AM PDT by wac3rd (Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
It's prep work - everyone in the picture (with the possible exception of Patty Murray, in whom no brain activity has been measured since 1981) knows perfectly well that 2/3 of Congress and 38 states are far outside their reach. What they're actually after is the sort of "compromise" that will grant them part of that proposal without the bother of getting it passed and ratified; i.e., just a little speech control and you can trust them that it will be as little as they need. They can be reasonable, see? They don't want to prohibit all political speech, only that part of it they don't approve of.
31 posted on 05/09/2014 11:24:21 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Those ‘wascally’ Founding Fathers sure screwed it up for the Marxist wannabes. Bill of Rights, Constitution,etc. The troglodyte Marxists have been working to neuter them for over one hundred years.


32 posted on 05/09/2014 11:25:41 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
No that’s Patty Murray of WA. Kirsten Gillibrand is the other senator from NY

Gillibrand is the one with the IQ of a cow. Murray maybe has the IQ of a box of rocks.

33 posted on 05/09/2014 11:26:30 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Oh, OK. I figured it was the other guy from NY but when I looked up a photo of Sen. Gillebrand, she actually does look like a woman (as opposed to Sen. Murray).


34 posted on 05/09/2014 11:28:44 AM PDT by shove_it (long ago Orwell and Rand warned us of Obama's America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 43north

Four Horse-Hinds of the Apocalypse


35 posted on 05/09/2014 11:30:01 AM PDT by mikrofon (TGITWE Bump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; All

I suspect that Sen. Schumer is exploiting constitutionally ingorant voters by brandishing the idea of Congress amending the Constitution along the same lines that Obama uses constitutionally undefined executive orders. More specifically, Obama has been known to make constitutionally indefensible executive orders to make himself look like a king making edicts in the eyes of low-information voters.

The bottom line is that corrupt federal politicians cannot afford for low-information voters to find out that the federal government has no constitutional authority to amend the Constitution. Only the states have the constitutional Article V power to ratify proposed amendments. But this doesn’t stop “leaders” like Schumer from giving clueless voters the impression that Congress can amend the Constitution.


36 posted on 05/09/2014 11:33:21 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Got rope?


37 posted on 05/09/2014 11:46:15 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Once an idiot, always an idiot.


38 posted on 05/09/2014 11:48:28 AM PDT by mulligan (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mulligan

That’s Chuckie


39 posted on 05/09/2014 11:50:52 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
That's quite the Marxist Quartet in that photo. Such happy people.
40 posted on 05/09/2014 11:52:38 AM PDT by Major Matt Mason ("Journalism is dead. All news is suspect." - Noamie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What an ass. I have to listen to his mouth almost everyday in Buffalo media. No matter how we try to get rid of him, NY City reelects this commie bastard.


41 posted on 05/09/2014 11:56:16 AM PDT by The Mayor (Honesty means never having to look over your shoulder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What is needed is a constitutional amendment limiting the boundries to what they can legislate, what they can manipulate and the TOTAL of income they can earn each year while a Member of Congress.

It should be considered treason for member of Congress to submit legislation that curtails ANY of the Bill of Rights on the Citizens.

This BS of people like Harry Reid becoming an multimillionaire in just a few years while a Member of Congress is corrupt on its face.


42 posted on 05/09/2014 12:08:08 PM PDT by VRWCarea51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Hey Chuckie, how about yours.”

Excellent suggestion!

IMHO


43 posted on 05/09/2014 12:32:53 PM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Chuckie Schumer is a runaway hemorrhoid!


44 posted on 05/09/2014 12:46:30 PM PDT by Stayfree (If it is left, then it can't be right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YourAdHere

They all look like they are at a funeral..


45 posted on 05/09/2014 12:47:19 PM PDT by Stayfree (If it is left, then it can't be right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

46 posted on 05/09/2014 1:06:37 PM PDT by Stayfree (If it is left, then it can't be right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Truly evil people. The same ones who also want millions of illegal immigrants naturalized but hey, it’s all about what’s good for the politicians.


47 posted on 05/09/2014 1:11:10 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (Hey 2008, we told you so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So, what more needs to happen before Jefferson or Madison would have counseled a shooting war?


48 posted on 05/09/2014 2:14:11 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Hey Chuckie, how about yours

The ultimate protection for free speech is the Second Amendment and the great and terrible promise of the State of Virginia: sic semper tyrannis!

49 posted on 05/09/2014 3:34:35 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The gang of four!


50 posted on 05/10/2014 12:57:44 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson