I will answer two questions for the dimwits, we the people care, and there was possibly a crime committed at the highest level of government, is why.
U.S. Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 115 § 2381
18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason
Current through Pub. L. 113-100. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
US Code
Notes
Updates
prev | next
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381
THERE IS NO STATUTE OF LIMITATION ON TREASON!
I am a Watergate aficionado, and I wish the GOP had the same single-mindedness that Mike Mansfield had when he designed teh game plan to remove Nixon.
But they don't.
Obama will not be removed unless it is proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he committed, or order to be committed, serious crimes.
That's not a Constitutional requirement, but it's a fact, proven by 3 previous Presidential impeachments.
So, what I don't get about Benghazi is, how do you see it leading to proof of crimes? That is, what crime(s) do you suspect that Obama committed?
The IRS and F&F both seem much more fruitful in this regard than Benghazi.