Movie: Blue vs Green (Store Blog for Purchasing Documentary Debunks Global Warming Myth)

Blue Beats Green Store Blog: Buy the Movie ^ | JD King

[This Just In]

Al Gore and the social engineers of the global warming hoax gave us 'An Inconvenient Truth'.

J.D. King has given us 'Blue Beats Green'. A hard-hitting, take-no-prisoners documentary addressing the global warming fallacies which are being fed to the world. It is an insightful and revealing film. I would encourage all of you to view this official trailer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNKQ-tkf-ds&list=TLmWMv7g7rRRrKiPLy68Km6XBAH6ZpKU9Z

[This Just In]

You may buy Blue Beats Green at:

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00IDRQ49S

You may rent Blue Beats Green at:

http://vimeo.com/ondemand/12938

[catnipman]

The DVD is named “Blue”, not “Blue Beats Green”,

So googling “Blue Beats Green” turns up almost nothing, and that search does not work internally at amazon.com, because the DVD is named “Blue”.

Unfortunately, searching for “Blue” is even worse! “Blue DVD” is useless too. even adding “King” doesn’t help.

Thus it is nearly impossible to find independent reviews or comments on this DVD.

The title is simply horrible from the standpoint as a search term. They REALLY needed to have added a subtitle.

At any rate, for you marketing gurus, note this movie title down as blunder of monumental proportions.

[This Just In]

“At any rate, for you marketing gurus, note this movie title down as blunder of monumental proportions.”

Chuckling over that statement.

With that being said, I had absolutely no problem finding the documentary when using my search engine. None-whatsoever. Not to suggest that you didn’t try hard enough.

[This Just In]

Also, I just clicked the link at the bottom of the title and it took me straight to the site.

I had no problem finding it on YouTube as well:

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9g-fHxqchPA0fy38VG0PrA

The buy and rent links are located on this youtube page. I clicked on both and the links took me to both Amazon as well as Vimeo.

[samtheman]

“blue beats green” in google finds everything including bluebeatsgreen.com

[This Just In]

I use another search engine and I still found the site. I’m not sure why the other Freeper could not locate the DVD. Thanks for posting.

[This Just In]

Incidentally, were you able to view the trailers?

[PapaNew]

You know, there's something wrong with what seems to be an implied presumption is this whole "global warming" debate.

The implied or expressed presumption seems to be that if global warming does exist, then governments are automatically empowered and justified to launch Agenda 21 and commandeer individual's rights to "save the planet".

The issue isn't global warming but the absolute nonsense that if there is a warming trend, man is causing it. This is a subset to the whole enviro-nazi/Agenda 21 non-scientific theory and agenda that at some point very soon, man will have somehow made the earth "unsustainable", again justifying governments to become totalitarian collectivist states in order to commandeer individual's rights to "save the planet".

These people have no solid scientific evidence of risks to "sustainability" even though they will blast you with a "wall of sound" about how correct the theory is. But it is nonsense. The earth is sparsely populated and vast areas of the earth that contain vast natural resources that have yet to be explored and tapped.

They're only guessing, and they use a lot of facts and figures to back it up, but in true collectivist fashion, they'll overwhelm you with detail hoping you won't notice their evidence, which may or may not be true, does not have a solid connection to their conclusions. So they're guessing.

Well, in that sense, I'm also guessing, but my gut tells me these atheistic (for the most part) Fabian, Progressive Socialists have an agenda of world dictatorship and this is part of that agenda. Truth doesn't matter to them. The ends justify the means to them.

But the truth is that God made the earth to ABSOLUTELY SUSTAIN a world filled with people. Otherwise He wouldn't have commanded man to "Be fruitful, multiply, and replenish the earth and subdue it and have dominion" over it (Gen 1: 28). After all, He made the world and obviously knows what's in it.

We are almost certainly in the last days and the truth is, the Bible points to global warming in the last days, but not this nonsense that man is making it warmer.

It would help to get non-agenda scientific community to show what REAL and REVIEWED scientific methods reveal about man's complicity. I know it's bunk but it would be nice to see some scientific proof to back it up.

[glyptol]

I have planted many more trees than I have cut down. What’s next? Will I get charged with malicious tree planting?
Or perhaps with creating shade without a permit. Could interfere with a solar panel, green energy taxpayer funded initiative we didn’t ask for anyway. Unlicensed agricultural water consumption. How about littering in the fall. Pesky leaves.
Creating a dog urinal without a bribe. Now I have it.

[This Just In]

“...and they use a lot of facts and figures to back it up...”

BULLLLLSHHHevic!

“...they’ll overwhelm you with detail hoping you won’t notice their evidence...”

They don’t have any evidence.

Man-made global warming is a myth and a lie.

[sneakers]

Just went to Amazon and put it on my ‘wish list’! Not many reviews yet, but what is there is all good.

[samtheman]

yes

[Excellence]

Thanks for pointing me to that.
The eco-whackos decided that it would be wrong to cut down and remove the trees that had been killed by the bark beetle infestation in the San Bernardino forest, so the trees dried up and sat there waiting for the streak of lightening to come and set them off. It resulted in the worst forest fire we've ever had.

[PapaNew]

There's a difference between evidence and an argument. Anything relevant to the argument is evidence. An argument is an assertion and a conclusion supported by facts and evidence.

There is evidence of possible trends towards "global warming." There is also evidence of Co2 auto emissions. The question is, is it evidence of a causal relationship or simply a concurrent relationship. Their conclusion is it is a causal relationship. But like Darwinism, there's no factual connection between their evidence and their conclusion, so they have no valid argument. The presence of both is simply concurrent, not causal.

Let's not pretend they don't have evidence of global warming (there appears to be evidence on both sides, but that's really beside the point) or Co2 emissions. That makes us look silly. Our focus should be that they have no valid argument, because, as the Progressives did with Darwinism and always do, they literally "jump" to conclusions which are not supported by all the facts and figures they present.

[trisham]

"Freedom is the sure possession of those alone
who have the courage to defend it."

~Pericles

Please support Free Republic
click the pic

[Moltke]

Good post, other than that cars emit cobalt.

[PapaNew]

Co2 right? That’s carbon dioxide, no?

[Moltke]

"Co" (lower case "o") is cobalt. "C" and "O" are carbon and oxygen. So CO₂ is what you were looking for. Not that I didn't know what you meant... ;-)

[PapaNew]

So Co2. Whassthat?

[Moltke]

Nothing from the world of chemistry AFAIK.