Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The White House's Cover-up of Benghazi ^ | May 13, 2014 | Chuck Norris

Posted on 05/13/2014 4:11:23 AM PDT by Kaslin

The Obama administration continues to suppress documents that could finally explain why U.S. officials lied to the world that the September 2012 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, occurred as a protest over an American-made anti-Muslim video. And the families and friends of the four brave Americans murdered there continue to suffer without answers, reasons or justice. Is there not a shred of heart left in Washington?

USA Today explained this past week how the watchdog group Judicial Watch blew the whistle on the White House's withholding of documents and obtained a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice under the Freedom of Information Act. In it, the Justice Department tries to justify its withholding of further Benghazi documents.

The 35 pages' worth of withheld documents was described by Justice trial attorney Robert Prince as including "internal strategy discussions relating to the drafting of an official response letter" from then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice to answer a variety of congressional questions about the Benghazi attack.

Just for the record, those documents include, but are not exclusive to, the following, according to USA Today:

--"A seven-page e-mail exchange consisting of 16 messages between State and other administration officials ... on Sept. 27 and Sept. 28, 2012, with an original subject line 'FOX News: US officials knew Libya attack was terrorism within 24 hours, sources confirm.'

--"Originally designated 'sensitive but unclassified,' the document was withheld to protect the formulation of a media strategy with respect to an ongoing sensitive matter under a FOIA exemption that protects the deliberative process, Prince wrote.

--"A one-page e-mail exchange, consisting of three messages, dated Sept. 11, 2012, with the subject line 'UPDATE: Clashes at U.S. consulate in eastern Libyan city (Reuters).'

--"A three-page e-mail exchange between State and other U.S. officials, dated Sept. 28, 2012 and originally designated 'unclassified.' The subject line of the first five messages is 'Statement by the Director of Public Affairs for National Intelligence Shawn Turner on the intelligence related to the terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.'"

This withholding of documents comes on the backside of another discovery by Judicial Watch: several emails that exposed Obama aide Ben Rhodes' tutoring Rice on how to play the blame game with the anti-Muslim video on television appearances only five days after the attack.

Moreover, Fox News revealed this past week that documents "show there are differences between Benghazi emails released through the federal courts to ... Judicial Watch and emails released to the House oversight committee as part of its investigation into the attacks. The discrepancies are fueling allegations the administration is holding back documents to Congress."

As far as why the White House continues its suppression of documents, Alec Gerlach, a State Department spokesman, explained that "additional documents are being processed for response to congressional inquiries." The key term there is "processed." Never mind the fact that the "process" has been going on for 20 months.

Even more evasive is State spokeswoman Marie Harf, who explained that documents will be forthcoming "on a rolling basis." That is code for "as they fit the Obama administration's political and selfish agenda."

Isn't it amazing? The White House can pump out 10,000 talking points and pages of documents trying to justify every angle of Obamacare, but it still can't answer four fundamental questions about the lives lost in Benghazi posited by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., who will spearhead a new congressional committee looking into the terrorist attack: 1) Why was security at the consulate so lax? 2) Why were repeated calls for more security disregarded? 3) Why was the U.S. military not more positioned and ready to pounce in that powder keg part of the world? 4) Why did the Obama administration contrive a duck-and-dodge response in word and deed to this vicious terrorist act immediately after it happened?

ABC News reported that retired Air Force Brig. Gen. Robert Lovell testified at the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform's fourth hearing on the attack that he and other U.S. military officials never believed that it was related to the anti-Muslim video. He was stationed in Germany at the time of the attack. He told Congress that he and other commanders strategized about what to do and that they waited for commands to come from the State Department, but those orders never came.

"There are accounts of time, space and capability, discussions of the question, 'Could we have gotten there in time to make a difference?'" Lovell said. "The discussion is not could or could not of time, space and capability. The point is we should have tried."

Benghazi-gate remains one of the greatest and most tragic commentaries on the White House's flagrant disregard for American human life for the sake of political expediency. I hope Gowdy's committee gets to the bottom of what really happened in Benghazi and what roles the Obama administration had in its cover-up.

The truth lies in what Republicans cited by USA Today say: "The White House claimed the attack arose from a protest against an anti-Islam video to protect the president's 2012 campaign message that al-Qaeda was in retreat."

President Barack Obama may repeatedly tout a decimation of the terrorist group's leadership, but Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James Amos, with whom I traveled to Iraq in 2007 to visit our troops, told Business Insider: "We may think we are done with them. But they are not necessarily done with us. ... You can't ignore (that part of) the world. ... You can't turn your back on it."

And what about Hillary Clinton's run for the presidency in 2016? She was secretary of state during the attack. Could it be that the Benghazi documents, which would shed light on the real truths behind Benghazi, are still being withheld to help her presidential campaign and prospective appointment to the Oval Office?

One thing is certain: Someone in the White House is continuing to heed the slimy advice of Rahm Emanuel, former White House chief of staff and now Al Capone-mayor of Chicago, who said, "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste."

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: benghazi; coverup; jaycarney; whitehouse

1 posted on 05/13/2014 4:11:24 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He asked 4 questions, I think he misssed the big one: where was Obama during the attack? There are alot of politicians gone to jail for using paid employees to work on campaigns; this is a screaming example of that, if nothing else.

2 posted on 05/13/2014 4:24:19 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

are there any statutes which permit Judicial Watch to take legal action against the POTUS for treason, malfeasance, or anything using the information they have uncovered??

3 posted on 05/13/2014 4:25:09 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
POINTS TO PONDER: One of the things power-crazed Dummycrats have elevated to an art form is acting like it never happened (when their policies turn disastrous).

And what about ex-SoS Hillary Clinton's 2016 ambitions? Are documents that shed light on the real truths behind Benghazi, being withheld to help her presidential campaign ...............

Jay Carney's high-pitched "dissembling and obfuscating"
on Benghazi has a medical purpose---if he doesn't save
Hillary's ***.... he's toast.

" C'mon guys. Gimme a break. I'm on life support, here.
If I don't save Hillary's ***, I'm looking at a long rest
in Ft Marcy Park."



EXHIBIT ONE Obama's van driver---currently has national security clearance.

Tommy Vietor--Hillary's top pick for Secretary of State.

4 posted on 05/13/2014 5:02:16 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Ut, oh----Hillary had a "premature enunciation" (snark).

Hillary Clinton Again Calls Benghazi ‘Biggest Regret’ as Secretary of State (and then Boko Haram happened)
wall street journal, 4/23/14 / FR Posted by Sub-Driver

BOSTON – Hillary Clinton reiterated Wednesday that her darkest time as secretary of state was the deadly 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Mrs. Clinton, in a speech to more than 3,000 people at a women’s leadership conference here, called the attack and loss of lives “very, very painful” and “certainly the biggest regret that I have as secretary of state.”

Hillary noted that she had taken responsibility for security at the diplomatic outpost, where Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans died, and had pledged to do everything she could to ensure a similar tragedy won’t happen again. (Excerpt) Read more at ...

NTL SECURITY POLICIES FOR PEOPLE WHO FELL OF A TURNIP TRUCK Hillary refused to place the savage "Boko Haram" terrorist group on the State Dept list of foreign terrorist organizations.....and today puts on her best "outrage act" over the kidnapped girls.


THE COVER-UP BEGINS Hillary's whining before Congress: "what difference does it make" was the start of the cover-up. Who can forget Obama and Hillary's love fest on CBS' 60 Minutes?

Obomba hustled Hillary on 60 Minutes to gaze in adoration,
after Hill's arrogant dismissal of the Benghazi massacre before
Congress. I thought sure Obama was gonna give 'er a B/J on
broadcast tv....he was THAT grateful.

For sure CBS will give Hill ample airtime so that she emerges pure and virginal for 2016. CBS will kneel in obeisance and give her 2-3 segments to explain it all away.....the word "Republicans" is already forming on those forgetful lips.

5 posted on 05/13/2014 5:08:41 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Hillary told a women's leadership conference that she had "taken responsibility" for security at the diplomatic outpost, where Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans died, and had "pledged" to do everything she could to ensure a similar tragedy won’t happen again.


MILITARY.COM reported (during the post-Morsi ousting in Egypt), that US Pentagon officials declined to give specifics on conversations between DOD's Chuck Hagel and brilliant tactician Egyptian Gen al-Sisi, who replaced Morsi.

(NOTE Gen al Sisi, 58, received a masters degree from the U.S. War College in Carlisle, Pa, in 2006. The General is revered by Egyptians for routing the Muslim Brotherhood which Egyptians consider a terrorist organization.)

Although officials would not discuss the specifics of the military-to-military talks, the US would need Gen al-Sisi's approval to move through Egyptian air space if Washington decided to send Marines to aid in the evacuation of U.S. personnel.

READY TO ROLL About 550 Marines and their tilt-rotor MV-22 Osprey aircraft are at bases in Spain and Italy on standby if they are needed. A Navy Amphibious Ready Group with 4,000 Marines and sailors aboard, led by the helicopter assault ship Kearsarge, was also in the region following completion of the Eager Lion training exercises in Jordan.

© Copyright 2013 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


AIN'T KARMA A *ITCH, HILLARY? the US helicopter assault ship Kearsarge, WAS in the region, ready to airlift Benghazi personnel to safety. Americans were lied to----we were told Kearsarge was not available to help endangered Americans in Benghazi.



(Q.) Who holds the key to unlocking the Benghazi secrets Obama and Hillary will not divulge?

(A.) That would be Egyptian Gen Al-Sisi who drove blood-thirsty Muslims out of Egyptian politics and has vowed to rebuild the 63 churches torched by the Muslim Brotherhood.

Right now, sitting in an Egyptian jail is a man al-Sisi arrested for inciting terrorism.

That man is Gehad al Hadad....once employed by the tax-exempt Clinton Foundation AT THE SAME TIME he was an active member of the Muslim Brotherhood, planning jihad.

Gehad is also conversant WRT how the M/B launders money to finance terrorism, using "tax-exempt foundations."

6 posted on 05/13/2014 5:13:24 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

For at least an hour of the time, Obama and Biden were on the phone with Netanyahu (an hour around dinner time, as I recall). They were briefed on the attack in the late afternoon. After the call with Netanyahu, Obama no doubt retired to his quarters (to get ready for his fundraising trip) and left Vietor and other low level flunkies in charge of the situation room.

Where he was is less important to me than did he give the order to stand down OR did he leave the decision to stand down or not to political low level flunkies.

7 posted on 05/13/2014 5:18:34 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Don’t worry the talking farm animal is getting this crap out of the way now so it will be forgotten by 2016. The MSM will defend her tooth and nail. Her infamous quote of “what difference does it make” Should be the battle cry of the conservative americans that love this country.

8 posted on 05/13/2014 5:20:36 AM PDT by Busko (The only thing that is certain is that nothing is certain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Drip... drip... drip...

9 posted on 05/13/2014 5:33:58 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; Republicanprofessor; Nachum

Great thread, thanks!

10 posted on 05/13/2014 5:49:43 AM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annieokie; penelopesire; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; thouworm; SE Mom; Nachum; onyx; ...

Benghazi ping.

Let Republicanprofessor know if you want on or off this ping list.

11 posted on 05/13/2014 6:08:22 AM PDT by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

12 posted on 05/13/2014 6:55:11 AM PDT by Nachum (Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Trey Gowdy ain’t playing !!

13 posted on 05/13/2014 7:00:05 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The public is not buying into this Benghazi thing - the media is circling the wagons around O and Hitlery. I watch Rassmusen, Gallop, and the RCP average Presidential approval numbers weekly and sometimes daily. One would think with the current instant communications system that we live in that a small percentage of America would start waking up - NO THE POLLS ARE TURNING ‘BETTER’ FOR OBAMA DURING THE PAST WEEKS.
14 posted on 05/13/2014 7:27:48 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
He asked 4 questions, I think he misssed the big one: where was Obama during the attack?

Until and unless definitive evidence of something else surfaces, it will be my belief that he was hunkered down with political advisers, strategizing about about how to cover his and the Wicked Witch of the Easts' butts.

15 posted on 05/13/2014 8:39:07 AM PDT by RobinOfKingston (Democrats--the party of Evil. Republicans--the party of Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Unfortunately, you are right. It has seemed like a game; I’ve wondered when he was hitting the lows at-15 (Gallup) and then bounced to -3 whether they just turn around and over-sample California. Whatever, the amplitude and the frequency have been high, but his trend is definitely up. I think we’re going to be seeing a lot of Michelle.

16 posted on 05/13/2014 6:46:42 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson