Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No, the Benghazi Questions Arenít All Answered: The media deny there are any. There are plenty.
National Review ^ | 05/14/2014 | Jim Geraghty

Posted on 05/14/2014 6:44:40 AM PDT by SeekAndFind



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: benghazi; media; presstitutes

1 posted on 05/14/2014 6:44:41 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I hope Rep Gowdy lines up some witnesses at the same time, like having Greg Hicks, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and Leon Panetta at the same table. Let the one who says it's “A” say it in front of the one who claims “B”. He can always bring them back individually, but let the liars try and lie in front of those who know the truth.
2 posted on 05/14/2014 6:57:48 AM PDT by JPG (Yes We Can morphs into Make It Hurt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“stand down” has a specific military meaning that is not immediately clear to non-military (and probably some military).

One can be told not to go and assist an ongoing battle, and that is not a stand down order. A stand down order is one to cease actions YOU are engaged in.


3 posted on 05/14/2014 6:58:59 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I remember watching the Watergate hearings. It wasn't the crime, it was the coverup that was interesting theatre.

Benghazi will be better. Nixon was stoopid. Clinton/0bama are criminal.

4 posted on 05/14/2014 7:07:50 AM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Past hearings have been run poorly. Too much speechgiving and not enough detailed questioning with a purpose and with followups. Perhaps Gowdy will change these mediocre panels and actually make this a substantive, thoughtful, and thorough invrestigation. So far he seems up to it.


5 posted on 05/14/2014 7:12:15 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

An article claiming to list unanswered questions that does not ask what Stevens was doing collecting weapons to be sent to Syria is itself part of the smokescreen.


6 posted on 05/14/2014 7:18:58 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Islam offers us three choices: Defeat them utterly, die, or surrender to a life of slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

They should start with why is Obama arming Syrian rebels with $millions in money and dangerous arms?

http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-admin-admits-to-covertly-sending-heavy-weapons-to-syrian-rebels-2012-12

Syrian rebels are tied to Al Qaeda.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/04/11/syria-al-qaeda-connection/2075323/


7 posted on 05/14/2014 7:21:05 AM PDT by mgist (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mgist

So Obama is supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda in the middle east. They are contrived terrorists organizations that are essentially the heroin cartels, for middle east governments.

Famed writer Seymour Hersch documented Obama’s bizarre use of American military to support the Muslim Brotherhood in the Middle East.

http://www.voltairenet.org/article183223.html


8 posted on 05/14/2014 7:23:49 AM PDT by mgist (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama didn’t have to issue a “Stand Down” order. He told the military, “This situation has been taken care of.”

Obama surrendered to Al Qaeda at Benghazi. Senator Schumer was at the White House until midnight. The Democrats, including Obama, weren’t sleeping. They were waiting for confirmation that Al Qaeda was going to accept Obama’s surrender.
Democrat lies are usually two levels deep. The story that Obama just went to bed is a lie. That is The Shallow Lie. It’s the one designed to look a little bad and cause people to say, “Oh, that must be true because it doesn’t look good for them.” It covers The Deep Lie. Obama surrendered to Al Qaeda at Benghazi.


9 posted on 05/14/2014 7:33:06 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

10 posted on 05/14/2014 7:38:10 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist

Syrian rebels pledge allegiance to Al Qaeda.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/04/11/syria-al-qaeda-connection/2075323/

Obama is arming them:http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-admin-admits-to-covertly-sending-heavy-weapons-to-syrian-rebels-2012-12

The Muslim Brotherhood, A Qaeda, and the Taliban are all known to be profiting from the heroin trade, and are essentially no different than the Mexican Sinaloa cartel that terrorizes Mexican towns and US borders. They are murderous sociopaths responsible for the deaths of thousands of people.

Obama’s Justice Dept has also been caught helping the Sinaloa cartel in the Fast and Furious scandal that was quickly buried, despite fascinating proof of arming the murderous carel, and cooperation with US government alledged by cartel members in trial.

We are a narco nation friends. With a $2TRILLION drug market it seems they have bought out the US Federal government. The cartels certainly are in charge. May God help us.


11 posted on 05/14/2014 7:39:04 AM PDT by mgist (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The victor always demands concessions when the other side surrenders. Al Qaeda demanded that there be no rescue attempt. There was none....ever. Al Qaeda demanded no military retribution to them in Libya. There has been none. Al Qaeda demanded money. Six billion dollars are mysteriously missing from The State Department. Al Qaeda demanded equipment. American weapons, armored vehicles and night vision equipment were mysteriously “lost” in Libya several months ago.
Obama betrayed us. He surrendered at Benghazi and gave aid and comfort to our enemies.


12 posted on 05/14/2014 7:39:52 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Democrats need to stop obstructing the investigation and help get to the bottom of this crime.

Democrats are looking like Nixon's crew...

And the press? If the boys in the press want to have jobs in a few years, they need to come across to the American public as credible. This is a serious issue - it's NOT a horse race between their beloved democrats and the ‘others’. You journalists aren't still in high school, are you?

13 posted on 05/14/2014 8:09:10 AM PDT by GOPJ (Want to keep your doctor? Remove your Democrat Senator. - - Freeper Balding_Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The media’s questions are all answered. That doesn’t mean there aren’t any questions outstanding. Such as, why were we using Benghazi to smuggle arms to Al Qaeda?


14 posted on 05/14/2014 8:12:46 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Help support Free Republic



please click the pic
donate today to the most conservative online site!


15 posted on 05/14/2014 8:13:47 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
contradicted each others’ testimony

When Hillary went to Tripoli, no security detail was left to chance. Hundreds if not thousands of our military were dedicated and stationed off-shore to support her safety at a time when real snipper fire might've felled her.

When it came to Stevens' safety and that of the CIA personnel, if they had had such military support, Stevens never could have been abducted as planned by the "complex [,pre-planned] attack." AQ/MB would've killed all our personnel if Barry had unleashed General Ham.

I'm sure the attackers felt justified in "roughing up" Stevens, since several attackers were likely killed, which would've gone against Barry/Hillary's advertised "we've taken away their bullets and all their security is Ansar Al-Shariah."

HF

16 posted on 05/14/2014 9:46:48 AM PDT by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Has Chuck Todd or any of the other “journalists” even asked where both obama and Hillary Clinton were on 9/11?
Why obama went to a party the very next day and the days afterward or why obama punished those that tried to rescue the nearly 40 men being shot at? Where are the survivors? Where!

None of them have, not a one!


17 posted on 05/14/2014 11:27:50 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

18 posted on 05/14/2014 5:31:29 PM PDT by mgist (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson