Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Force plan to strip generals of authority
http://www.washingtontimes.com/ ^ | May 12, 2014 | Maggie Ybarra

Posted on 05/14/2014 7:17:34 AM PDT by Whenifhow

Senior Air Force leaders have drafted a budget-driven plan that would strip the three- and four-star generals who oversee major commands of their authority to manage their bases. A draft of the plan obtained by The Washington Times shows that the Air Force is aiming to consolidate support operations under the umbrella of a single center, known as the Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center.

The tricky endeavor would shuffle day-to-day base management issues — such as construction, maintenance and procurement of equipment and supplies — from under the authority of the senior generals who command the bases to the leadership of a two-star general who would run the support center, according to the draft proposal. The plan was born out of a directive from Air Force leadership last year to reduce headquarters operations costs at least 20 percent by 2019. It cites reductions contained in the Budget Control Act that were implemented by the Obama administration in 2011. The consolidation would affect the service’s 10 major commands, each of which specializes in areas such as technical training, management of non-nuclear combat air power and global air mobility.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airforce; general; military; militarypurge; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 05/14/2014 7:17:34 AM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

“The measure of a man is what he does with power.”

~Plato




help support the most conservative online site
click the pic


2 posted on 05/14/2014 7:18:23 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
Is this some derivative of ‘the purge’?
3 posted on 05/14/2014 7:20:40 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

In before the FR naysayers come by to assure us that this is normal, every president does it, and there is no purge...


4 posted on 05/14/2014 7:20:54 AM PDT by null and void (When was the last time you heard anyone say: "It's a free country"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Apparentlt outsourcing isn’t just for IT any more.


5 posted on 05/14/2014 7:22:26 AM PDT by MortMan (Avoid temporary variables and strange women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Well. Where we have a Hitler-like bunkerocracy like we have with the Obama administration, either commanding stupidly from the rear, foregoing Generals’ inputs altogether or commanding not-at-all (as in Benghazi), it seems these 3 and 4 Stars are about as useful as teats on a bull, doesn’t it. Why not strip them of their token power?


6 posted on 05/14/2014 7:23:33 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone; Nachum

It doesn’t appear to be a purge, but rather a “re-organization”, but perhaps others can offer expertise in this area.

from page 2 of the article:

The “concept of operations” document — or initial draft — shows that the support center would have control of services such as fuel distribution, vehicle and support equipment, material management, small-arms training and ammunition allocation. Although the official said some of that framework was altered after the generals reviewed and rebuked the proposal, it is unclear how much of the framework was carried forward to the revised plan.
Retired Gen. Charles F. Wald, former deputy commander of U.S. European Command, said the Air Force has to implement structural changes because it cannot afford to chew through its budget at the current rate. Gen. Wald, who is now vice chairman and federal practice advisory partner for Deloitte, said the plan to consolidate base operations authority under the umbrella of a single support center on the surface “makes perfect business sense.”
“I think we should have done this 20 years ago,” he said. “Here’s the problem: I would have done it if I had known how to do it. I didn’t.”


7 posted on 05/14/2014 7:23:41 AM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

New Air Force Command announced:
Operations, Bases, Arms, Materiel, Authority (OBAMA) Command


8 posted on 05/14/2014 7:24:18 AM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

This week we learn that the Army is downsizing by another 30,000, the VA is systematically rewarding management to deny treatment to vets making defacto death panels, and that only 1 out of 5 applying to the military are getting accepted.

Sorry, it sure sounds like a purge to me.


9 posted on 05/14/2014 7:26:53 AM PDT by Nachum (Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael

Now that’s funny!


10 posted on 05/14/2014 7:29:43 AM PDT by the anti-mahdi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

Probably — if there was a purge —. It’s consolidation of the worst sort. It weakens the traditional command structures and autonomy and will eventually breed a new type of base commander — one that has nothing to do but police racial, religious and sexual orientation attitudes.

Meanwhile, senior Military positions will be usurped by the political appointee process with no oversight. Making the military top heavy and more politically political rather than militarily political. Local contracts will be steered by political appointees back in ‘Washington’s’ Pentagon to more politically pliable contractors.


11 posted on 05/14/2014 7:32:25 AM PDT by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center = White House.


12 posted on 05/14/2014 7:33:07 AM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
Actually this maybe a good idea. I have dealt with three and four stars from all branches that didn't know jack about infrastructure and were lied to about issues and capabilities from underlings and the Generals didn't know enough to call BS.
13 posted on 05/14/2014 7:34:05 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

And there will be a five-year plan for all of the bases, right?


14 posted on 05/14/2014 7:35:15 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
Most major corporations are reorganizing this way. Instead of having each sector manage its own HR, IT, etc. they have stood up sectors that supply all of the support staff that provide their services to the other sectors.

Seems reasonable to me.

15 posted on 05/14/2014 7:35:21 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

This is the Obama administration’s big, central government being forced on the military. Just as this big, central government can’t adequately micromanage the affairs of the entire country, this plan will be a disaster as top heavy managers at this new control center will fail miserably in their efforts to manage too many diverse things at once. Talk about the waste in the military budget now for procurement and contracts, wait until there is no one to watch the till.

This is just another aspect of the socialist progressives tightening their control over the country. First, it was the economy, then healthcare, then energy, now the military. Soon, big government will be just a communist dictator with czars to do his bidding.


16 posted on 05/14/2014 7:37:45 AM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
Consolidating into one single target does not sound reasonable.
Air superiority wins. Without it, we're sitting ducks.
17 posted on 05/14/2014 7:39:02 AM PDT by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

Centralization of power and authority.

So you’ll have a politically connected 2 star telling an operational 4 star what to do.


18 posted on 05/14/2014 7:41:46 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trisham

The problem with this is that some high-up brass in another state doesn’t know what each base/lower unit needs. I’ve seen this problem with my Guard unit. Some of our training is localized, some organized by Brigade or higher. And when the higher units do the organizing, we ended up with some drills where we didn’t know if we’d have enough ammo to run through all the training for everyone. Other field drills, we got to go burn ~9000 9mm because we had extra and the paperwork to turn it back in just isn’t worth it.

Some stuff, yes, is better at a higher level. But some logistics just can’t be properly handled on a large scale, where people don’t know what’s going on, have little experience with it, and have ever increasing paperwork requirements to go through.


19 posted on 05/14/2014 7:42:16 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Perhaps the homosexualization of our military can be more easily inserted by a more centralized command structure.


20 posted on 05/14/2014 7:43:59 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson