Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Hillary Responsible for Releasing Criminal Aliens?
NRO ^ | Mark Krikorian

Posted on 05/14/2014 3:32:34 PM PDT by ObamahatesPACoal

In response to my colleague Jessica Vaughan’s revelation that an “ICE Document Details 36,000 Criminal Alien Releases in 2013,” the Obama administration said that many of the releases were mandated by a Supreme Court ruling from 2001. A spokesperson for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) told Breitbart News that “mandatory releases” accounted for “over 75 percent of the homicides listed” (of which there were 193 — meaning that ICE chose to release “only” about 40 of the foreigners with homicide convictions). For all the criminal alien releases, Vaughan’s report estimates that about 8 percent fell in this category, or close to 3,000 people.

The Supreme Court case cited is Zadvydas v. Davis, which held that the federal government can detain aliens for deportation up to six months but generally must release the alien into the United States after that point if there is “no significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; clinton; hilary; obama

1 posted on 05/14/2014 3:32:34 PM PDT by ObamahatesPACoal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ObamahatesPACoal

Hillary? Ultimately, the responsibility goes through Holder as implementor for Obama/Jarrett.


2 posted on 05/14/2014 3:41:15 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
However, federal law requires the secretary of state to stop issuing visas to the citizens of any country that refuses to take back its nationals. Such a threat would have a remarkable effect on a country’s willingness to cooperate, increasing the “likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future” and thereby allowing for detention longer than six months, if necessary. As the Supreme Court explained, its holding “does not mean that every alien not removed must be released after six months.”

So, why are we still releasing criminals? Have China, Jamaica, and the rest stubbornly defied our cutoff of their visas?

Hardly. What’s actually happened is that nothing’s happened. The State Department has ignored the legal mandate and just keeps on issuing visas in countries that won’t take back their own citizens. Secretaries of State Hillary Clinton and John Kerry have decided it’s better for ICE to release criminal aliens into American communities — even at the risk of their committing further crimes — than to risk upsetting relations by halting the issuance of visas, as required by law. Back in 2011, then–DHS secretary Janet Napolitano admitted at a hearing that she wasn’t aware of the Obama administration ever having complied with this legal requirement.

Specifically, the law states:

“On being notified by the [DHS Secretary] that the government of a foreign country denies or unreasonably delays accepting an alien who is a citizen, subject, national, or resident of that country after the [DHS Secretary] asks whether the government will accept the alien under this section, the Secretary of State shall order consular officers in that foreign country to discontinue granting immigrant visas or nonimmigrant visas, or both, to citizens, subjects, nationals, and residents of that country until the [DHS Secretary] notifies the Secretary that the country has accepted the alien.” [8 U.S.C. § 1253(d); emphasis added]

3 posted on 05/14/2014 3:47:00 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kabar

HILLARY CLINTON PARODY: Try to Remember
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWQureIC1QM


4 posted on 05/14/2014 3:52:40 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
Hillary? Ultimately, the responsibility goes through Holder as implementor for Obama/Jarrett.

Not if you factor in the fact that probably half of Obama's admin are Clinton holdovers/followers.

5 posted on 05/14/2014 3:55:55 PM PDT by raybbr (Obamacare needs a death panel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Re Post 3:

That’s very interesting material. You’re saying that if the SOS (Hil) followed the law, she would pressure other countries to control their citizens by threatening to cut off legitimate visas.

That’s fascinating, and it’s typical of Dems following only the laws they like, but I don’t think it’s the primary driver of our illegal problem. By that, I mean that if ICE and DOJ did their mandated jobs, the borders would be secure and violators prosecuted.

I guess it’s a supply/demand slide argument!


6 posted on 05/14/2014 3:59:45 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Good work.


7 posted on 05/14/2014 4:25:03 PM PDT by Ray76 (True change requires true change - A Second Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson