Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Election 2016: Hillary Vs. Republican Field Polls
Real Clear Politics ^ | May 2014 | Real Clear Politics

Posted on 05/16/2014 12:36:24 AM PDT by entropy12

Based on RCP Poll Averages From Best to Worst--->

Christie:- Clinton +9.0

Ryan:- Clinton +9.3

Paul:- Clinton +9.4

Bush:- Clinton +10.8

Huckabee:- Clinton +12.4

Cruz:- Clinton +14.0

Rubio:- Clinton +14.4

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016; clinton; election
Yes it is too early. But polls are being taken. Brain damage or not, Hillary currently leads them all.
1 posted on 05/16/2014 12:36:24 AM PDT by entropy12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: entropy12

She was also beating then Senator Barack Obama as late as 2008, if I recall correctly. Remind me how that turned out. And she was quite a bit younger and more appealing then (she’ll be 70 by election day in 2016) and has physical and mental difficulties now. Running for and governing as president is one of the hardest jobs anyone can attempt. I’ve worked on presidential campaigns. It’s a non-stop grind. Ted Cruz is 43 and Sarah Palin just turned 50, and they don’t even look that old.


2 posted on 05/16/2014 12:46:48 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Health issues and age (she will be 2nd oldest behind Reagan) could keep her out.


3 posted on 05/16/2014 12:48:18 AM PDT by entropy12 (Some thought Obama would be no worse than Romney. So we have less jobs and more food stamps people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Look at those names and poll numbers very carefully.

Who is missing?

It’s Sarah Palin.

Why don’t they show the poll numbers of Hillary v Sarah?

You can bet they don’t because Sarah leads Hillary by several points.


4 posted on 05/16/2014 1:18:16 AM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

I want to see the poll that has hillary running against moochelle. As we know, when it comes to democrat candidates, experience is not a qualifier.


5 posted on 05/16/2014 1:24:16 AM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Early, but still illuminating: after all that people know about Hillary, after all these years of lies and incompetence, she is ahead.

A majority think she lied about Bengazi. So, there is a slice of the population that will vote for her anyway.

At this point the party in opposition to the pResident has produced no leaders - they continue to care what the media says about them.

We. Are. The. Greatest. Country. in. the. World. /s


6 posted on 05/16/2014 2:29:52 AM PDT by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

These polls are showing no matter Hillary’s sordid history and lack of definable accomplishments, the country is still maddeningly hooked to the idea it must have her in the White House.

I believe she’s popular because Americans see her as someone who will run over whomever must be crushed in order to carry out Obama’s agenda. They seem Obama as too “soft” on the opposition.

Yes, the country has gone that far leftward.


7 posted on 05/16/2014 2:38:06 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Obama is so far in over his head, even his ears are beneath the water level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

These polls are showing no matter Hillary’s sordid history and lack of definable accomplishments, the country is still maddeningly hooked to the idea it must have her in the White House.

I believe she’s popular because Americans see her as someone who will run over whomever must be crushed in order to carry out Obama’s agenda. They deem Obama as too “soft” on the opposition.

Yes, the country has gone that far leftward.


8 posted on 05/16/2014 2:38:35 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Obama is so far in over his head, even his ears are beneath the water level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Sorry for the double post.


9 posted on 05/16/2014 2:39:10 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Obama is so far in over his head, even his ears are beneath the water level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

What’s sad is some prominent erstwhile “conservative” women will state they voted for Hillary because they felt compelled to be “a part of history.”


10 posted on 05/16/2014 2:42:12 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Obama is so far in over his head, even his ears are beneath the water level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Yeah and the video of those college IDIOTS the other day shows we are screwed FOLKS,keep dreaming if you think any conservative has a prayer,the media whores will see to that


11 posted on 05/16/2014 3:32:05 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
Health issues and age (she will be 2nd oldest behind Reagan) could keep her out.

"Weekend At Bernie's 2016".

She can say Benghazi is part of Norway, fall, stumble, run into things, forget the year, forget where she is, and forget her name, and the MSM won't report on it.


12 posted on 05/16/2014 4:06:47 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

All Democrats are united behind Clinton. Republicans (understandably) are split regarding whom they prefer. That’s all this poll shows.


13 posted on 05/16/2014 4:28:46 AM PDT by BlueStateRightist (Government is best which governs least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12


14 posted on 05/16/2014 4:33:31 AM PDT by JoeProBono (SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist

Always the way it is. Conservatives refused to get behind Santorum so the nomination went to Romney. How dumb is that. Some of you think Santorum is not great but he is better than Obama and Romney. Oh well your loss (those that were stubborn).


15 posted on 05/16/2014 4:47:13 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Governor Scott Walker 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

“Hillary currently leads them all. “.........

Like all media stories and polls, “Tell ‘em what you want them to hear”.


16 posted on 05/16/2014 5:32:52 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

If she’ll be 70 by Election Day, and she wins, she would be the oldest ever.


17 posted on 05/16/2014 6:40:03 AM PDT by RPTMS (I know you're a nincompoop, and I strongly suspect you of being a scalawag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

Sarah has shown no interest in running.


18 posted on 05/16/2014 8:35:29 AM PDT by entropy12 (Some thought Obama would be no worse than Romney. So we have less jobs and more food stamps people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
She was also beating then Senator Barack Obama as late as 2008, if I recall correctly. Remind me how that turned out.

Don't lose track of reality. That is a cardinal sin in politics. In 2008 Hillary & Obummer split the dem vote. In 2016 Hillary will be practically unopposed. She will not be spending any money during primaries. Just the opposite for republicans. They will be all busy tearing each other apart during primaries.

19 posted on 05/16/2014 1:46:16 PM PDT by entropy12 (Some thought Obama would be no worse than Romney. So we have less jobs and more food stamps people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

You are one of the few who recognizes what happened in 2012.
If either Newt or Ricky drops out, Romney was toast.


20 posted on 05/16/2014 1:47:42 PM PDT by entropy12 (Some thought Obama would be no worse than Romney. So we have less jobs and more food stamps people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Freerepublic endorsed during that primary, and it wasn’t for the Romney/Specter fan, Santorum.


21 posted on 05/16/2014 3:38:22 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Hillary is vulnerable to a primary attack from the left just like 2008.
Until the Chicago mob commits to her, or at least signals a stand-off agreement, I’m not ready to award the crown.


22 posted on 05/16/2014 3:41:14 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

It matters not how much you lead Hillary if you don’t step up to the plate and at
least act like you have some interest in taking on the daunting job.


23 posted on 05/16/2014 3:46:57 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Revisionist. As always you have lied. Millions endorsed Santoum on FR.


24 posted on 05/16/2014 5:41:40 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Governor Scott Walker 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

I have never lied in a post, so you can drop that lie.

Revisionism is you claiming that FR didn’t endorse Newt Gingrich over the Romney/Specter fan, Santorum.

The same one the Palins supported.


25 posted on 05/16/2014 5:47:53 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Well? Did FR endorse Gingrich or not?

By the way, where did you get the idea that “millions” of freepers endorsed Santorum?


26 posted on 05/16/2014 6:32:04 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Think Ansell2 meant JR was supporting Newt in the primaries after about January of 2012. But that didn’t mean Santorum suppoters, like me, weren’t here. However, when it became clear Santorum had more momentum the Newt fans wouldn’t back down attacking Santorum. These same Newt Fans turned on Newt for the most part right after the primary season was done and I brought it up the hypocrisy on some thread. Newt said something they didn’t like in November of 2012. Plus people were mad when he dropped out and did not go all the way to Tampa. Everyone was mad by that phony convention. You could see the loss coming after that GOP farce of a convention.


27 posted on 05/24/2014 12:45:15 AM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson