Skip to comments.Eric Shinseki’s Meaningless Claim That He ‘Takes Responsibility’
Posted on 05/16/2014 7:43:57 AM PDT by george76
The abominable callousness demonstrated at the Department of Veterans Affairs is deadly serious, and warrants more than an all-too-familiar claim of responsibility from Eric Shinseki:
Of course, Shinskei is just echoing his boss and other members of the administration:
Secretary of State Hillary Clintons declaration that she takes responsibility for the failure to secure our facilities and personnel in Libya with no word on any actual consequence of this failure is the most recent example. But the approach began from the very start of this administration.
Discussing the national debt in Virginia on Aug. 6, 2009, Obama said, I dont mind being responsible. I expect to be held responsible for these issues, because Im the president. Weve added $4.4 trillion in new debt since he said those words.
* After ObamaCare passed, the president admitted he hadnt kept his promises on how the legislation would be handled... Obama said. I take responsibility.
The new way to avoid taking responsibility is to tell the world youre taking responsibility.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
It started with Janet Reno after she burned a bunch of people alive. The phrase was meaningless but it made the press swoon over her.
Today it means 'praise me for being so cool and shut the 'f' up ... let's move on'...
Time to fall on his sword.
Heck, everybody takes responsibility.
Obama took responsibility for Obamacare and the disasterous roll out. So did Sibelius.
Hillary said she took responsibility for Benghazi.
These liberals say they take responsibility, the media is satisfied with that, and then we’re all supposed to move on, and not ask any more questions.
Off, OFF, Damned Sarcasm!!!
Only when followed immediately by,
“...and therefore I am resigning my position effective immediately” does the term “I take full responsibility” have any meaning whatsoever.
Oh, you want to “take responsibility”? I won’t believe you until you say you want to “take the consequences” and that actually happens.
Beyond that, it’s JUST WORDS devoid of any meaning.
And move on to replace Sebelius at HHS or Lerner at IRS ?
For as long as this has been known about; if he were competent then
1. He would have already begun an open and full internal investigation.
2. He would have already begun directing subordinates to correct the problems.
3. He would have come to the hearings fully prepared to answer the questions and provide the committee with updates on what was being done to correct the information.
4. His answers to questions that he didn’t have information about would have been “I don’t know sir but I will return with full answers to those questions”.
This is the least most senior officers expect of their subordinates in a military setting but then he was a general officer and now a high level political appointee so needs no competencies or integrity.
Doesn’t say much about any abilities that brought him to a “leadership” position in the Army much less any ounce of integrity. He’s another political appointee whose allegiance is to himself, his career, and his democrat sponsors.
Saying they take responsibility is supposed to protect them from actually being held responsible.
That is how DC works these days.
I think Shinseki’s the guy who, when he was Chief of Staff, decided all soldiers in the Army should be able to wear the black beret...y’know, cuz it’s not fair that only the elite get to look dashing.
For them, saying “I’m responsible” is almost the same thing as them saying they were ... wrong. How much more could anyone possibly expect from such perfect creatures!?
TAKING RESPONSIBILITY MEANS IMMEDIATELY MAKING THINGS RIGHT, RESIGNING, OR GETTING FIRED!
It's not rocket science.
But the explanation is simple.
Rot always starts at the head and works its way down.
And after it begins...
It's never reversible.
THEY take responsibility, but OTHER people pay the price for their actions. Just like Hillary takes responsibility for Benghazi, but Amb. Stevens pays the price (via "smoke inhalation").
He’s little different from one of the many other self-aggrandizing general officers like Former Air Force CoS Merrill Tony McPeak, the “manly man” general who dictated the wear of V-neck Tee-shirts for the force back in the early 90s so that airmen could show their “chest hair” and portray the “manly man” image. He was widely despised and laughed at by even the other general officers. There was great joy and relief when he retired. Sadly that idiot and Shiseki are all too commmon in the military and have been for quite a while.
I thought Shinseki’s decision about the black beret was because that was the color of Monica’s beret.
These bureaucrats would be shocked -- shocked!, I say -- if they were ever held accountable for their failures. That's just not the way things are done with "public servants" (though I still hesitate when I include the "l" in "public").
“Rot always starts at the head and works its way down.
And after it begins...
It’s never reversible.”
The electorate is no longer virtuous and no longer follows God. The leaders reflect the values of the people they serve.
The next time you get a traffic ticket, tell the officer “I take responsibility.” Then throw the ticket away.
The next time you are contacted by the IRS, tell the agent “I take responsibility.” Then ignore all future IRS requests for money.
The next time you are at the airport, shout out loud “I take responsibility.” Then simply bypass the TSA screening area and head out to your plane.
Who would have guessed it could be just that easy?