Posted on 05/18/2014 2:37:46 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
Edited on 05/18/2014 5:17:20 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Sadly, Scott Walker is right.
We may think that, but many who are college and young adult aged consider themselves conservatives on economic issues, but more libertarian on the moral issues. They may be pro-life, but they just don't see homosexual marriage as a threat to them. Unfortunately, they've grown up seeing marriage diminished by heterosexuals, so they don't see how homosexuals can do any more damage.
Sorry, they’re not conservative under any definition.
If the gubmint is handing out cash to single moms and fatherless kids, the gubmint has a big interest in marriage. The whole point of marriage is to unite moms and dads with their offspring so that kids have the best shot at being successful citizens with the support and tutelage of the people who created them. Now if you want to ditch government support to unwed moms and the kids, then I might agree with you.
That was satire right?
The gov has no interest marriage for stable families and they haven’t for 50+ years.
The homosexual so called marriage has zero to do with anything but breaking down tradition
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.