|This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.|
Skip to comments.The big bang is not a Reason to Believe!
Posted on 05/20/2014 9:28:14 AM PDT by fishtank
The big bang is not a Reason to Believe!
by John G. Hartnett
A response to "A Response to Four Young-Earth Objections to Inflation"1
Published: 20 May 2014 (GMT+10)
Astrophysicist Dr Jeff Zweerink works for the Hugh-Ross-led organization Reasons to Believe. He recently wrote the above article. Relevant portions of his words are reproduced (in green) with my comments interspersed.
It could hardly be said that the Bible is giving a simplified account of the big bang/evolution history of the universe A remarkable correspondence exists between inflationary big bang cosmology and the Bibles accounts of the universes origin. This is his summary statement, which one would assume that his article itself will support. But if you look deeply into the details the substance evaporates.
How can a correspondence exist between the biblical creation account and the big bang cosmogony (the study of the origin of the universe)? Leaving aside the elephant in the kitchen, the 6 ordinary days of Creation Week,2 just look at the respective sequences of events.
...more at link...