Posted on 05/21/2014 8:13:44 AM PDT by Kaslin
Memorial Day marks the unofficial end-point of spring wherein Tennyson told us a young man's fancy lightly turns to thoughts of love. Now its time for that same young man, and the young female subject of his prurient interests, to fancy looking for summer employment. This 90 day trading of textbooks for shovels has long been a cornerstone of the American capitalistic experience. Unfortunately, like so many other deemed-arcane traditions, the students summer job has lost its shine.
According to the U.S. Department of labor, youth employment rates for summer jobs have increased since the bottom of the recession in 2009 and 2010 but that news is good only when viewed against the trough. In historical context, fewer young people as a percentage are working summer jobs than at any time since the late 1940s. Depending upon the source of the forecast, the projections for youth employment this summer range from bleak to stagnant. So whats going on? Are young people simply decadent, dependent and distracted?
Wouldnt grownups like to think so?
The truth is that there are two fairly discernable reasons for a lack of youth participation in the labor force. One factor is driven by policy and the other is a product of culture.
A summer job is the result of a calculus on the part of a business owner/manager. If a company has a need for additional work to be performed, or for work to be performed and its fruits stored for use over the next several months, it calculates the cost of that work. If the cost of having that work done is affordable, then the student gets the job. If either a sophisticated algorithm or a simple heuristic determines the cost of hiring is simply too high then the job isnt offered. In an economy where businesses are being taxed and regulated straight from the pages of Atlas Shrugged, The math surrounding offering summer employment is not adding up.
Interesting, then, that the Democrats solution to the employment crisis is to increase the minimum wage. Guided by the playbook of their economic oracle, Franklin Roosevelt, they feel as though the way to cure a problem is to tax it. Isnt it obvious that the reason employers arent hiring more young people is that it just doesnt cost them enough? If a liberal were a 12-step sponsor their first recommended step on the road to their sponsees sobriety would be a good stiff drink. Of course, anyone who can count from 1-10 while getting the numbers in the right order knows that the Democrats current push to raise the minimum wage doesnt really have anything to do with helping young inexperienced workers.
The far more distressing aspect of declining youth participation in the employment market is the cultural one. Much of American history has seen the celebration of work. For generations children were taught that work was something that gave them a meaningful role in society and that would allow them to develop the self- esteem that can only be derived from expended effort on the path to achievement. That is not the message coming from society and parents today. Walmart provides low to modest wage jobs to hundreds of thousands of workers and they are vilified as exploitative. Mom or dad loses their job and the government provides them with enough benefits and leisure time to seduce them out of the workforce. Movies portray bosses as Moron-taurs, part idiot, part monster and depict the worker who says stuff it as the aspirational hero.
Adults like to say that young people are simply lazy and too content to play video games and text friends all day. Question, parents: Who bought junior the Xbox and iPhone? The same adults who criticize youth for their slothfulness are the ones who take credit for teaching Johnny how to swing after his little league home run. If you taught him to hit then you taught him to sit! Society cant just cherry-pick when waxing poetic on their influencing of youth.
Years ago, radio commentator Paul Harvey said when covering a teachers strike Teachers on a picket line should remember they are still teaching. Young people learn from example. Society, heal thyself.
Getting a CNA certification takes less than 3 weeks. The retirement homes are always hiring. They pay $10 an hour and the shifts are 12 hours long.
Get to work, kid.
I like this line. It sumarizes the Democrat philosophy quite well.
Young people should be occupied doing something productive.
I like the idea of the CNA jobs. It’s productive work, and those jobs are always available.
I also like the idea of students doing volunteer work. Retirement homes and hospitals are always looking for volunteers. If they aren’t working for pay, they can at least be doing something productive with their time, rather than overdosing on video games.
The last thing a kid wants to do is to attend to the various bodily fluids of a really old person who has on average less than 3 years to live.
“I like the idea of the CNA jobs. Its productive work, and those jobs are always available.”
See post 6 for why these jobs are “ALWAYS AVAILABLE”
I am constantly shocked by what employers find acceptable.
People with dirty clothes, dirty hair, tattoos, hard ware on their faces... they all wait on you wherever you go.
How is it that is OK?
I went to a favorite restaurant the other day and the kid who brought my dish had dirt under his fingernails.
OK, maybe he didn't cook the food but there he was with his hands on my dish!
I won't go back there!
Working 6 days a week is completely horrible to most of these people. Lack of social skills, actually being able to speak proper English is another set back.
Middle aged IRS employees, and tax attorneys should be, too.
Get off of my lawn.
In the City of Santa Cruz, California, there is an ordinance banning hiring discrimination upon the basis of appearance.
5.56mm
Agreed. But then lets not say that there are no jobs to be had. Just jobs that American young people will not do.
BTW, my daughters are CNA’s working their way through college.
I know foreign kids come over here and work in summer camps. So that means there are jobs available.
The youth I know (and it certainly is not every one) work hard and make plans for the future. They don’t want to be living at home when they are 21 or 22.
I remember the ‘older generation’ condemning my generation for being lazy and no good (they may have been right). What I know for a fact is that the majority of the youngsters out there are decent typical teens. The extremes always get the news
At that point I would have got up and walked out. I’ve sent back wine when the waitperson brought it to me with their hand at or near the top of the glass. You always carry it from the stem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.