Skip to comments.Will a Rogue General Undo Obama’s Regime Change in Libya?
Posted on 05/21/2014 5:21:00 PM PDT by SJackson
It didnt take Egypt very long to revert back to a military oligarchy. The Arab Spring was trumpeted as a new era in the history of the Middle East. But the Middle East is better at undoing history than the media is at writing it.
In Egypt, General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi brushed away the Arab Spring. Now in Libya, General Khalifa Hifter is set to undo Obamas military intervention which put the Muslim Brotherhood on the road to taking over Libya.
Forty-five years ago a group of officers led by Colonel Gaddafi seized control of Libya. Gaddafi enjoyed support from the military and Federalist opponents of a central government.
Now General Khalifa Hifter is leading another military coup while vowing to free Libya of chaos, instability and corruption. His forces pounded Islamic militias in Benghazi, including those responsible for the murder of four Americans, and seized the parliament in Tripoli.
Hifter, who has spent a long time living in the United States, claims to have American support, but his real support probably comes from the east.
Like Gaddafi, Hifter is supported by the military and the Federalists. However he isnt fighting a weak monarchy, but the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda and other Islamist militias. But like Gaddafi, his takeover was probably inspired by Egypt and possibly even planned out by Egypt.
Egypts new government, which overthrew the Muslim Brotherhood, cant risk allowing the group to control a bordering country and one of the largest oil reserves in Africa. Gaddafi used Libyas oil wealth to fuel his insanity and fund terrorism. The Muslim Brotherhood would funnel it into pursuing its program of regional and global takeovers and the Islamic militias that control much of Libya would become a problem for Egypt.
Egypts immediate security agenda is to control border instability fed by the Muslim Brotherhood in Gaza and Sinai. It would only be natural for Egypts new rulers to turn their attention to their countrys large western border with Libya.
When he released a video calling for a change of power, General Hifter appeared marginalized and isolated. Now he has powerful financial, military and tribal allies. And many ordinary Libyans see him as a possible alternative to the unstable brutality of militia rule, of which the Benghazi attack that killed four Americans was just one example, the collapsing governments and the threat that the simmering civil war which never really ended might heat up until the bloodshed becomes as extreme as anything in Syria.
The Syrian Civil War is also Hifters best asset and greatest threat. The conflict called away many Jihadis who had originally fought in Libya, but if that unholy war collapses and there isnt a more appealing conflict waiting in the wings, they may drift back to Libya to fight its military. Al Qaeda has training camps in Libya and the Islamic militias are doing well, but they may not have the numbers to take on General Hifters forces. And with Syria and Egypt consuming the energy and attention span of Jihadis worldwide, this may be Libyas only chance to beat them.
Even though Hifter is stepping into the slot occupied by Gaddafi, it doesnt mean that he is another Gaddafi.
General Hifter had close links to the United States and the CIA. In the Middle East that doesnt mean much, but he is less likely to share Gaddafis resentment of the UK or his demented flavor of Socialism. Gaddafi had the same relationship to Egypt as Kim Jong Il did to the Peoples Republic of China. Like China, Egypt thought it was getting a smaller version of its own rulers; instead it got an insane maniac who couldnt be controlled by anyone including his backers.
This time Egypt may actually get what it wants; a stable Libya under military officers who, like their Egyptian counterparts, are less interested in revolution and more interested in the good life. In the best case scenario, the generals may stabilize Libya. If they dont, Libya will wait for a strongman to finally get the job done.
The question is whether General Hifter can get the job done.
The Muslim Brotherhoods roots in Libya have always been weak. Unlike Egypt, it hasnt done too well at straight elections and has been forced to resort to political machinations. It got the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group to switch its orientation from Al Qaeda to the Brotherhood long enough for Gaddafi to set them loose and for them to help overthrow him. But that left the Brotherhood dependent on Islamic militias with unstable allegiances and a hunger for power.
That hasnt worked too well for the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria where its influence has been swamped by Al Qaeda. The Brotherhood is a parasite that depends on a facsimile of civilization even as it works to destroy it. Post-Gaddafi Libya is closer to Syria than to Egypt, its tribal links are more powerful than political slogans and even religion.
If Libyas generals can win quickly, the Muslim Brotherhoods hopes of getting its greasy hands on the countrys oil wealth will go the way of its brief time ruling Egypt. If they cant, then Libya may go the way of Syria. The Libyan military was known as a joke under Gaddafi and its performance during the Libyan Civil War didnt do much to impress anyone.
And then there is the Obama card.
General Hifter claims American support, but its doubtful that he has anything except maybe a few leftover contacts in the CIA. The Arab Spring was never about democracy, it was about convincing Islamists to pursue their Caliphate dreams through political elections, instead of suicide bombings. Hifter, like Al-Sisi, is upsetting that particular apple cart and the vendors of its sour fruit in Washington and Brussels wont thank him for it.
But Al-Sisi also demonstrated that Obama is too weak to be worth fearing. Despite his support for the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama was forced to accept a new Egypt. And, after kicking and screaming, even provide it with military aid. Hifter is gambling that Obama wont turn to a second unpopular military intervention in the Middle East and will accept a fait accompli.
Especially if it turns out to have been backed by Saudi Arabia.
Egypt was meant to be a model for the revolutions of the Arab Spring, but instead it became a counterrevolutionary model. Even if Egypt isnt behind Hifter, the general obviously drew inspiration from what the Egyptian military did to a much more powerful Muslim Brotherhood regime. And he also drew inspiration from Obamas inability to meaningfully respond to it.
Like Obama, the pundits and talking heads will learn little humility from the swiftness with which the Middle East erased their new era of history from history. They thought that their plans for the region were set in stone. Instead they were writing on sand. The wind has blown across the desert and their plans have blown away with it.
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
If htis Khalifa Hifter is anything like el-Sisi, more power to him. He'll end up doing us all a service by killing a lot of Islamic zealots.
This guy has nothing to fear from our nancy-boy president. He ought to go right to work taking down the terrorists.
Yes, I think he will.
He’d be a fool to depend on 0bama for support. In fact, given how completely wrong 0bama and his State Department have been at every turn in the region, he’d better start watching out for drones.
Obama has the Sidam Touch. Everything he touches turns to sh#t.
By comparison to what has transpired, an American educated military government in Libya would be a welcome development indeed.
Then he did the job we should have done, and Americans should be grateful to him.
In 2006, Obama's illegal participation in Kenyan politics led to the massacre of Christians. In 20012, his intervention in the political of Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and yes Syria has also led to the massacre of Christians.
For the voters in a Christian country not to realize this is evil on the part of their pastors, many in some denominations actively supporting Obama; Obama who supports the killing of Christians in Muslim lands; Obama the post-natal abortionist and the gay marriage advocate. The GOP seems intent on ignoring Obama's tragic history in regard to Christians, too.
Yes and sadly he's got his fingers all over America.
That is largely because Obama is a sociopathic checkers player in a world of international chess. He and his media lap dogs feel no obligation to tell the truth about anything so they are able to manipulate public opinion in the USA. But public opinion and a $2 will buy you a big gulp at 7/11.
Actually some good news. Interesting.
My wife came in and yelled at me so I lost my train of thought in my last post. What I meant to say is US opinion and 20 or 30 Billion dollars won’t buy you crap at the international relations 7/11. Obama is outclassed by everyone on the international stage. His administration simply does not have a clue what they are doing or what their actions will accomplish. Their policies are nothing but a crazy waste of taxpayers money which have done nothing but put US interests and allies in jeopardy, especially Christians. I would guestimate that Obama’s policies have most likely resulted in some of the largest massacres of Christians in the Middle East and Africa since the crusades. If that was one of their goals then maybe they count that as a success.
Looks like DC needs better terrorist allies.
Things are starting to crumble in on “The Won” from all directions - someone took their finger out of the hole in the dyke -
May it reach critical mass soon and take them all with it.
Isn’t Libya Italy’s problem?