Posted on 05/23/2014 9:11:50 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
I see, so he deserves to lose the State to a Democrat over his remarks. How very serious-minded of you. He stated clearly and cogently that the energy at the inception of the T.E.A. Party (grass roots conservatives reacting to Obamacare and a frighteningly real supermajority of progressive dems in control of government)was aimed at electing Republicans and it was a success. Using that same energy now to defeat RINO’s instead of further solidifying their gains is not battling the right way. He may be wrong about that strategy, but your assertion that he deserves to lose for making them is grade school hyperbole. Your State gave us Sebelius after all - so maybe if your energy was consumed preventing that from ever happening again instead of flapping and spraying about GOP this and GOP that, there would be fewer instances like that to contend with in the future. Politicians are rarely effective leaders and managers - managers of resources, managers of budgets - Walker is one of the best of both. He’s no RINO because he sees the outworking of strategy differently than you.
The daughter of Trek Bikes is a Dem? I might have to sell my Trek. I bought it because it is American made, but I didn’t know I am going to help Rats...
Answer them and they disappear.
Trek also moved all their jobs overseas except for the top of the line high tech bikes.
.......wishful thinking, liberal journalist
He caved on queer “marriage” and will not take stand. He’s the top law enforcement official of the state and could tell that Federal judge who overruled the will of the people where to stick it. In otherwords he could be a man. What he’s turned out to be is just another political opportunist more concerned with getting reelected than defending the laws of his state. Is there one Republican governor in this country that still has a backbone? We know it’’s not Walker.
If Palin was still the governor of Alaska she would have fought tooth and nail if a radical federal judge ruled that the state’s ban on same-sex marriage was illegal. Her rationale would have been that in 1998 the people voted and said “marriage was the union of a man and woman”. She would have instructed her state attorney general to do his job and appeal any ruling by an activist judge, straight to the Supreme Court. And while the appeal was in process there would have been no “marriage” license for a couple of clown lesbians or faggots wishing to “get married”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.