Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Left Hates Prosperity
Townhall.com ^ | May 26, 2014 | Shawn Mitchell

Posted on 05/26/2014 2:59:24 PM PDT by Kaslin

Earnest Progressives urging their liberal champion Elizabeth Warren to run for president pose a critical riddle for Americans: Can the Left promise Americans prosperity and opportunity when Leftists dislike the people, forces, and dynamics that generate real growth? Do liberals even like prosperity?

The American Left disapproves almost everything about people who create wealth in a free market: They distrust the profit motive; they disdain consumerism; they question entrepreneurs’ moral claim to the fruits of their own labors; and they fail to grasp the seamless bond connecting “business” and “people,” believing instead, that business is some dangerous separate thing that can be demonized, harassed, and shackled in the name of making things better for people.

Barack Obama tried to blunt this criticism in the second presidential debate, asserting: “I believe that the free enterprise system is the greatest engine of prosperity the world's ever known,”

Observing the administration’s treatment of business and the economy, it’s tempting to dismiss the claim as a whopper on the scale of “You can keep your doctor.” But the truth is actually worse. Obama probably does believe free enterprise builds prosperity best of all; but, that’s just not very important to him. He cares more about concepts like fairness, equality, social justice, and government control of the economy than about growth and opportunity.

A booming economy, soaring markets, robust growth and investment, all actually produce things the Left dislikes: Personal fortunes, growing inequality; higher consumer expectations, more building and expansion. A vibrant economy of producers and consumers becomes a society inclined to let freedom hum along without government needing to run the show—that’s anathema to the Left.

One of the most beguiling expressions of this view helped Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren become a darling of the left. Warren set liberal hearts aflutter with her redistributor’s manifesto:

“There is nobody in this country who got rich on their own. Nobody. You built a factory out there - good for you. But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to market on roads the rest of us paid for. You hired workers the rest of us paid to educate. You were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn't have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory... Now look. You built a factory and it turned into something terrific or a great idea - God bless! Keep a hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along.”

Liberals swooned, but if you rinse off the sugary rhetoric, the salvo is incoherent. First, the business owner paid all the same taxes for all the same public purposes as everyone else. Rather than incurring a debt for future success, he likely paid more than other taxpayers for the services all enjoy. Second, the community didn’t pay taxes for roads, schools, and police in order to benefit the business owner, but rather, for the benefit of all. Third, the same infrastructure is available to all. Our society has roads, schools, laws, and enforcement. If those resources explain the businessman’s success, don’t they also rebuke the rest of us because we didn’t build a factory?

In a free society, people have a natural right to pursue their happiness, make their living, and maybe start a business. Or work for a business owner. That is a different concept from having a collective lien on the success of those with the vision, risk, drive, and luck to make something happen, just because they happen to enjoy the same services we do.

Finally, after attributing business success to the infrastructure and taxes supplied by the rest of us, Warren somehow backflips into arguing reparations are owed not for reinvestment in the infrastructure, or rebates to the sponsoring taxpayers, rather, it’s owed forward to the “next kid who comes along.” The argument is nothing but little word flowers amounting to demanding the wealthy give over more of what they have for government to distribute in ways people like Warren judge good.

A less remarked but in some ways more remarkable expression of the Left’s philosophy of greed as social justice issued from candidate Obama to Charlie Gibson of ABC News. Gibson cited fiscal experience to challenge Obama on his support for a large increase in capital gains taxes, pointing out that when Reagan cut cap gains rates, revenues actually rose, and when Clinton increased rates, government receipts fell. Why, then, would candidate Obama want to increase rates if it meant the government would collect less tax revenue? “For purposes of fairness,” the candidate explained.

He plainly said he would sacrifice public revenues and services in order to bite rich ankles harder. There’s no doubt Obama’s vision informs his foreign views as well as domestic. The wealthy are an affront to poorer Americans. America is an affront to poorer nations. No, he and his ilk do not care about prosperity for those they judge already unjustly fat and comfortable.

That’s the American Left. In the Warren/Obama playbook, a controlled economy is better than a growing economy. A pie sliced by government is better than growing pie for all. A tax rate that hits the rich harder is better than a rate that actually generates more revenue for public services.

For our economy really to flourish, government would have to unshackle it. But, that play is not in the Leftist book.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 05/26/2014 2:59:24 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The left is brainwashed into thinking this is real:
When, in the course of development, class distinctions have disappeared, and all production has been concentrated in the hands of a vast association of the whole nation, the public power will lose its political character. Political power, properly so called, is merely the organized power of one class for oppressing another.

If the proletariat during its contest with the bourgeoisie is compelled, by the force of circumstances, to organize itself as a class; if, by means of a revolution, it makes itself the ruling class, and, as such, sweeps away by force the old conditions of production; then it will, along with these conditions, have swept away the conditions for the existence of class antagonisms and of classes generally, and will thereby have abolished its own supremacy as a class.

In place of the old bourgeois society, with its classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all.
And by some bizarre reasoning, they also think that abolishing the family, abolishing rights of inheritance, abolishing religion, and generally abolishing everything that normal society has been built on, they can achieve their illusion.
2 posted on 05/26/2014 3:04:35 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Sounds like a marxist to me. These goose steppers are full of Sh*t! They rake in millions and they say they want everyone to be equal. Just look at the Klintons and all the money they are making while preaching to the low brows.


3 posted on 05/26/2014 3:05:20 PM PDT by Busko (The only thing that is certain is that nothing is certain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The Left Hates Prosperity

Except their own, of course.

4 posted on 05/26/2014 3:08:01 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; All
Thank you for referencing that article Kaslin. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

Regarding the title of the article, the left does not hate prosperity. The left hates when somebody else prospers and they don't. Sadly, the left is slow to learn that it's better to learn how to fish instead of "making a living" by accepting fish from others.

5 posted on 05/26/2014 3:11:15 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Busko

“Sounds like a marxist to me.”

And hence our problem. The left have insulatd themselves from being called Marxists. It is McCarthyism.

We need to get over it and call them what they are. And when called out on it, we should say, “damn right” and then ridicule them for it.


6 posted on 05/26/2014 3:12:27 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz ("Heck of a reset there, Hillary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The true believers in progressivism/liberalism are insane. They cannot operate from a position of rationality. They live in a world ruled by cognitive dissonance and are incapable of recognizing this. They are driven by emotion and use that emotion as a hammer to beat others psyches into submission. Until these people decide they’ve had enough it will not stop.


7 posted on 05/26/2014 3:17:29 PM PDT by raybbr (Obamacare needs a death panel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom
Right. Normal Americans prosper when authority gets off of their backs.

Socialists prosper when the state has America by the ankles shaking the earnings out of its pockets.

8 posted on 05/26/2014 3:18:39 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

As long as the LIVs keep electing village idiots like Obama and Warren the economy can’t recover.

The lying sacks of crap on the left keep claiming we are IN recovery. It’s hilarious how they change the numbers when they’re in power to favor themselves and when republicans are in control they fake the numbers the other way to trash them.


9 posted on 05/26/2014 3:26:19 PM PDT by Bullish (You ever notice that liberalism really just amounts to anti-morality?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Nailed it. If Tolik were still around he’d be sending out a ping.


10 posted on 05/26/2014 3:28:43 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The leftists love THEIR prosperity.


11 posted on 05/26/2014 3:29:27 PM PDT by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“And by some bizarre reasoning,...”

It’s not really bizarre reasoning. They just use collectivism and the abolishment of all you mentioned to keep everyone else from competing with them.


12 posted on 05/26/2014 3:39:57 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
There is nobody in this country who got rich on their own.

She is clueless about how an individual actually becomes rich. First, he has to figure out and come up with a new or better product, a new or better means of production, or correctly anticipate changes in demand. This will lead to higher revenues and/or lower costs, which lead to higher profits and higher than average rates of profit. Then, he has to make the choice of consuming less and saving and reinvesting more of the profits. Then, he has to keep repeating the above over and over again for a long period of time.These are individual virtues that do not depend on others.

13 posted on 05/26/2014 3:41:56 PM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

It’s bizarre insofar as embracing the unnatural and thinking it’s going to work.


14 posted on 05/26/2014 3:48:27 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom
Except their own, of course.

Example: Al Gore just bought a 9 million dollar California mansion. But that doesn't stop him from hating YOUR prosperity.

15 posted on 05/26/2014 3:52:33 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Example: Al Gore just bought a 9 million dollar California mansion.

Is that the same Al Gore who a few years back made a whopping $500 annual donation to charity?

16 posted on 05/26/2014 3:54:20 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

You have to remember that collectivism is a means to an end. If you look at the ancient world the 1 percenters had it made compared to the other 99%. Today’s 1 percenters wax nostaglic for those good old days and are doing everything they can to re-impose it!


17 posted on 05/26/2014 3:54:48 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

And the same Al Gore who was worth $2 million on 2000. So how’d he get to buy a $9 million dollar mansion now? Not by creative economic activity, that’s for sure.


18 posted on 05/26/2014 3:56:02 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s a given.


19 posted on 05/26/2014 4:16:35 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Left is not political. Politics is the Trojan Horse of the Left, like Religion is the Trojan Horse of Islam.

Both are about tyrannical power - only.

Leftist want to run the tyranny.

Liberals want to be favored pets of the Leftists.

And RINOs...

...are the Leftists with the job of neutralizing any organized resistance to the Left.

Does anyone see anything remotely resembling political opinions here? Constitutional issues, maybe? No?

Because their are none. And that’s why liberals get so pissed off if you want to talk issues. The only “issue” to a liberal is obedience. Not not “get” this, to them, is to literally be stupid. That’s why they hat conservatives - from the liberal point of view, conservatives are stupid because they don’t get that it’s about obedience, and dangerous because they stand in the way of the tyranny of those whose boots the liberals lick.


20 posted on 05/26/2014 4:22:37 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I don’t think they hate it at all. Look where all the prosperity in this country is centered - Washington, DC! They control the joint. If they hated prosperity, it would look like Port-au-Price or Detroit. Instead, it looks like Shanghai! What does that tell you?


21 posted on 05/26/2014 4:32:53 PM PDT by Gritty (Climate hysterics shriek on. Loud and apocalyptic is the only setting on the machine.-Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
“There is nobody in this country who got rich on their own. Nobody.

Actually, what they hate is that you did it without their permission. And what they hate more is that you don't need them.

They are dedicated to creating a system in which they are important, where you have to have their permission, defer to their judgement, and where they matter without actually having to do the things you had to do to create the things you create and build the things you build.

In the system they impose they control industries they never created and never invested in. They take control of lands and businesses without having bought or built or earned any of it.

They accuse the rest of the world of being driven by greed. But demanding control of what you never built is the very definition of greed.

22 posted on 05/26/2014 5:34:42 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Busko

To them, it’s all luck and all hype, not hard work behind the scenes and they don’t get it that it takes time, not just the right person.


23 posted on 05/26/2014 7:52:57 PM PDT by CorporateStepsister (I am NOT going to force a man to make my dreams come true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Most of the fools don’t understand, that they are the very types that would not survive such a society.

There is no way a celebrity/actress would be making as much as they do and there is no way that in the past, a celebrity would be able to consult a head of state publicly.

Look at China; their elite are the business tycoons, the scientists, the engineers, the computer programmers, and such, while entertainers are reportedly used as playthings (in the literal sense) and more patronized than well regarded.

You don’t hear celebrates mouthing off about the Chinese government and trying to tell the President how to run the country. They would get shot, which I think is a nice approach.

In the US, we need to drill it into the heads of the young that luck is a part of success, but not the bulk of it. Luck is only a minor part, the rest is inspiration and legwork. Very little is luck and hype.


24 posted on 05/26/2014 8:04:16 PM PDT by CorporateStepsister (I am NOT going to force a man to make my dreams come true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: marron

It’s also the definition of freeloading.


25 posted on 05/26/2014 8:04:45 PM PDT by CorporateStepsister (I am NOT going to force a man to make my dreams come true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

You said it....I have always said that Communism is truly the most hardcore capitalism the world has seen, by perverting what people create to be sold to willing buyers...to the Nomenkaltura who use the force of Government (laws, regulations, taxes, military, police and crony contacts and deals) to tilt the table for their own enrichment.

Warren produces nothing, but she sells free stuff for votes and personal wealth for herself. It’s the coward’s shortcut that lives on the backs of the productive to redistribute those monies to a fake “ deserving” person whom Paul can always vote for as Peter will be robbed, and it’s done legally.

Fauxcohontas is the ultimate crony Commie jackhole.


26 posted on 05/26/2014 10:23:11 PM PDT by wac3rd (Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wac3rd

Yeppers. Capitalism is used by both individuals and collectivists. It’s a choice of either allowing individual, free enterprise capitalism for all or state-controlled or oligarchical-controlled capitalism for the few.

Right collectivism only benefits the rich and the poor while the middle takes up the... until all of us are broke except that 1%.

And this is what you see happening to America - the rich creating a conversion process from free enterprise capitalism to state-controlled while using the poor as a straw man and at the same time imposing progressive taxation and the devaluation of the currency by taking us off the gold and silver standards plus printing money like there’s no tomorrow.


27 posted on 05/26/2014 10:31:16 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The left wants to limit growth so people will limit the birth rate, also all profits need to be funneled to the government for theft by fascist leaders within the party.

Sociopath fascists now run most of our government, that’s why we see death panels at the VA, and in ObamaCare.

The death panels will limit treatment for conservatives....Our country and the democrat party have lost it’s soul...


28 posted on 05/27/2014 5:53:22 AM PDT by stockpirate (Only a tidal wave of tyrants blood will return our tree of liberty......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s harder to control prosperous people, so naturally progressive control freaks hat prosperity.


29 posted on 05/27/2014 8:30:01 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
It is McCarthyism.

McCarthy was 95% right.

30 posted on 05/27/2014 8:30:56 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

progressive control freaks hate prosperity.


31 posted on 05/27/2014 8:32:31 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson