Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How about bring back the draft to include women?
JewishWorldReview ^ | May 27, 2014 | By Alicia Colon

Posted on 05/27/2014 5:55:07 AM PDT by US Navy Vet

Last January 2013, then Defense Secretary, Leon Panetta, ordered the Joint Chiefs of Staff to study the feasibility of opening all military jobs to women by 2016. This would include more than 200,000 jobs that make up the core of the ground-level combat force in the Army and the Marine Corps. Opponents of women in combat argue, rightly in my opinion, that the military's physical standards must not be compromised to expand access because our military's fighting effectiveness is at stake. Hauling 50 pounds of equipment while walking 20 miles is a standard that must not be demoted as it exemplifies routine combat challenges.

Meanwhile, Sage Santangelo, at 5'3", is fighting to become an infantry officer in the Marine Corps. At a petite 5'3'', Santangelo may not look like a combat fighter but the female second lieutenant has never let that hold her back from pursuing her dream of becoming an infantry officer in the Marine Corps so she said in an ABC News interview. I say-"So what?" I wish I was a foot taller so I'd be at my correct weight but that's not going to happen.

(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: draft; usmilitary; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last
I would LOVE to see the Kardashian BITCHES and the Obama "Girls" get DRAFTED!
1 posted on 05/27/2014 5:55:07 AM PDT by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
How about bring back the draft to include women?
Would sure put a dent in that draft-eligible inequality problem.
2 posted on 05/27/2014 5:58:40 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

The draft is a socialist tool, what we have now is the best way to fill the ranks. Anyone that supports the draft is in fact a socialist.

In the event of war that the people do not support the government would be unable to fill the ranks.


3 posted on 05/27/2014 6:00:20 AM PDT by stockpirate (Only a tidal wave of tyrants blood will return our tree of liberty......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
At a petite 5'3'', Santangelo may not look like a combat fighter but the female second lieutenant has never let that hold her back from pursuing her dream of becoming an infantry officer in the Marine Corps

Seesh.

4 posted on 05/27/2014 6:02:18 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Want to keep your doctor? Remove your Democrat Senator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Wouldn’t that be expensive?


5 posted on 05/27/2014 6:03:55 AM PDT by redhawk.44mag (The problem with the world today, is that it wants to be digital, but it's really analog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

I would leave the country before I would allow my daughters to be drafted. Barring outright widespread invasion of the mainland, we still need somebody to keep civilization going.


6 posted on 05/27/2014 6:04:23 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("I'm a Contra" -- President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

While they might get drafted, it would be daughters of conservatives that got sent to the Russian Front in the next war.

Bet the farm on that.

Kartrashians would be desk sitters at some exotic location stateside.


7 posted on 05/27/2014 6:05:18 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuhh.................

Does it EVER occur to ANYONE to ask the military what it actually needs?
Then do THAT?
Without PC?

Just asking.


8 posted on 05/27/2014 6:05:31 AM PDT by Flintlock (islam is a LIE, mohammmud a CRIMINAL, sharia is POISON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

Do you consider Isreal a socialist government?


9 posted on 05/27/2014 6:05:48 AM PDT by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
It takes a lot of training to operate advanced weapons systems. After making that investment you want your recruits to stick around for the long haul. The draft is counterproductive in this environment.

Fight the Free Sh☭t Nation
I, for one, welcome our new Cybernetic Overlords /.

10 posted on 05/27/2014 6:06:12 AM PDT by Mycroft Holmes (<= Mash name for HTML Xampp PHP C JavaScript primer. Programming for everyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

‘Equality” isn’t about sharing the less savory obligations of males/whites/striaghts, only the perceived benefits.


11 posted on 05/27/2014 6:07:41 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

The 0 administration will probably enact the first senior citizen draft soon for the front lines to eat the first round of bullets and ensure they don’t have to pay healthcare benefits at the same time. Jarrettwill get a billion dollar bonus for her ingenuity.


12 posted on 05/27/2014 6:08:51 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 5thGenTexan

Yes, Israel’s Gov is VERY Socialist.


13 posted on 05/27/2014 6:09:41 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

Charlie Rangal has been trying to reinstate the draft for years.So I know it’s a bad idea.


14 posted on 05/27/2014 6:09:57 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
How about bring back the draft to include women? Ha. Like that's going to happen.

That's the only reference in this article to the draft, a throwaway line that served as a transition. The article has nothing to do with the draft, it's a discussion of the Democrat scheme to force the services to accept women into jobs that they are incapable of doing, and except for a few crazies, do not care to do

15 posted on 05/27/2014 6:13:14 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

“I wish I were a foot taller,so I’d be at my correct weight.”
How does she justify that?


16 posted on 05/27/2014 6:14:50 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

If the draft ever returns, they should draft all politicians and their families and put them in the front line.


17 posted on 05/27/2014 6:18:17 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

Rangel wants the draft because he sees the absence of a draft as the reason why there aren’t anti-war protests like during the Vietnam War. He doesn’t see it as either a way to improve the military or to improve society (because some 18 year olds need their butts kicked in boot camp). Instead he sees it as a way to turn Americans against the military.


18 posted on 05/27/2014 6:18:59 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Republican amnesty supporters don't care whether their own homes are called mansions or haciendas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

I’m all for it. Let the females prove their assertions once and for all they can meet the same standards as the men.


19 posted on 05/27/2014 6:21:08 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Obama is so far in over his head, even his ears are beneath the water level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Where as that might be funny, would you want them in your foxhole so to speak? Because I sure as He!! would not.


20 posted on 05/27/2014 6:21:27 AM PDT by defconw (Well now what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean
“I wish I were a foot taller,so I’d be at my correct weight.

”How does she justify that?

After reading that a half dozen times it looks that is the author's wish (whose picture makes it look like she could lose a few pounds) and not the 5'3" woman who wants to be a Marine officer. Someone who was 5'3" with the proper weight of someone 6'3" would not be described as "petite".

21 posted on 05/27/2014 6:25:02 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Republican amnesty supporters don't care whether their own homes are called mansions or haciendas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
How about bring back the draft to include women?

In the meantime, let's check the draft registration status of one Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Dunham, aka Baraq Hussein 0bama and the social security number he is using.

22 posted on 05/27/2014 6:27:11 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty ("Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle?" - Patrick Henry, 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Sooooo true and right on the money. Today equality is all about reaping the benefits will avoiding the responsibility. Equality ends as soon as the grunt work is required then, suddenly, chivalry is demanded.

Feminists are all about equality until they are asked to do tough jobs. They want the benefits of hard work and labor without doing the actual work. In essence, they want status and they are willing and work tirelessly to change the rules in every group they invade to ensure they come out on top. We, and the rest of the world, are expected to change the rules to suit them. A work ethic based on merits is tossed out for one based on status. This is on display in nearly every women filled office out there. The ladies that work the hardest, that do the most, that achieve, are pushed down so those with the status can rise up. Whether its money, beauty, tit size, weight, there is always a female class system that actively discriminated against the women who play by mens rules of hard work and achievement. My fiance has been through it over and over. She is skinny, pretty, and works like a man. The females at many of the places she works sabotage, talk crap, and actively hinder her at every step. They can’t stand that she gets real work done and they hate her for it and that she is thin. Instead of lifting themselves up and working hard, they make the rules about politics and status so achievers like her never get ahead. I would love to hear from other women about they discrimination, bullying, and garbage they put up with at work perpetrated by women. There is no bigger hater of women then other women.


23 posted on 05/27/2014 6:27:40 AM PDT by drunknsage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
Anyone that supports the draft is in fact a socialist.

Correct. When a war worth fighting appears, there will be no shortage of talented volunteers. Look what happened right after 9/11.

24 posted on 05/27/2014 6:27:51 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL-GALT-DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

“Don’t shoot the girl” is only one of the many things included in the “Code of the West”.

Girls on front lines get shot at. With great malice from the shooter.

The purpose of including females in the military forces in the first place was to free up more able-bodied males to carry out the hazardous tasks.

Granted, not every able-bodied male is by nature a warrior - this requires a fierce and dedicated state of mind, not an attribute equally shared across all of humanity.

Which is also a reason that a forced draft will not work. Unwilling or unmotivated soldiers are more a liability than asset for any army.


25 posted on 05/27/2014 6:35:03 AM PDT by alloysteel (Selective and willful ignorance spells doom, to both victim and perpetrator - mostly the perp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

I think that every woman up to the age of 55 should be enrolled in the draft. There are far too many women who are OK with voting Democrat because they don’t have to suffer the consequences of their votes. They vote Democrat because the Democrats cut the military budget to give that money to welfare. These women voters don’t have to worry about facing an enemy on the battlefield, so they don’t care if the military is too small and is equipped with old equipment. It’s time they faced the consequences of voting for Democrats. A bullet to the head can really ruin a good hairdo.


26 posted on 05/27/2014 6:38:34 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

Considering the state of things, I’m glad I didn’t sign up. The air force wanted me for some position doing IT work, jumping out of planes, cross training with the army, to set up forward operating bases. I’m glad I didn’t. My buddies that went regret it to this day. It was a pointless war then and it still is now. I predicted that we would never achieve any real sense of victory in Afghanistan, especially when you consider the Russians experience there. It would last long enough for a Democrat to cut and run and look at where we are today. Pointless loss of life so goatherders and Muslim psychopaths can run amok. I was right about it and Iraq. It wasn’t the great call to arms my grandfather experienced when he enlisted to fight the Japs. In was nothing more than a political battle to fight a faceless enemy in a crap hole part of the world that hates us and would stab us in the back the moment we turned around. Japan and Germany were civilized cultures that could be put back into place. Muslim dirt holes always have and always will be a den for human misery, perfect for murderers, barbarians, and child predators.


27 posted on 05/27/2014 6:46:38 AM PDT by drunknsage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

If you get Elizabeth Warren or some other deranged person as president, part of the plan will be to have a draft for males only. Women will be secure as they graduate colleges, get jobs in US businesses, while young men are in some “exotic” land, reshaping American businesses to be more “feelings-oriented” and with the need of more men the illegals will be made citizens but exempt from fighting. It will be a way to kill and maim as many males as possible while strengthening the femdom society that liberal women so desire. The liberal female president will convince the American voter that while “women can fight alongside men” that 453 years (or whatever number) of oppression is enough to limit women draftees.


28 posted on 05/27/2014 6:47:26 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement ("World Peace 1.20.09.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

How about no draft, ever


29 posted on 05/27/2014 6:48:22 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drunknsage

The only reason we’re in Afghanistan is to protect the poppy fields.


30 posted on 05/27/2014 6:49:48 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 5thGenTexan

Uh yeah.


31 posted on 05/27/2014 6:52:08 AM PDT by Kozak ("It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal" Henry Kissinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Some bright 18 year old male will get the idea and sue over the Equality issue, since the women opened the camel’s tent to sub service and combat. But I believe the upper draft age is like 36?

Now if you want to draft older there are plenty of civie jobs that they can do. War is not a old persons best venue.

Look at our Brass they are still fighting the LAST war.

Ret. SCPO wife. I held down the home front, washed fatigues in the bathtub along with all our clothes including cloth diapers, dried them outside, and ironed them, sewed on patches, altered pants. And kept the kids/house. BAQ stunk in the 60’s didn’t get much better in the 80’s when he retired.

As for the rich they just buy their way out.


32 posted on 05/27/2014 7:04:01 AM PDT by GailA (IF you fail to keep your promisesI to the Military, you won't keep them to Citizens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Yes, absolutely.
They wanted the vote and now (voluntary) battlefield positions.
If we don’t include them in a draft, it is sexual discrimination, and not allowable.


33 posted on 05/27/2014 7:07:04 AM PDT by polymuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean
“I wish I were a foot taller,so I’d be at my correct weight.” How does she justify that?

Maybe she's solid and extremely fit; I would expect so if she's a Marine. Bottom line: if she can meet the standard, she gets the job. But no allowances against the standard.

34 posted on 05/27/2014 7:09:10 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty
In the meantime, let's check the draft registration status of one Barry...

Sorry, can't. Soon after he got elected POTUS there was a Selective Service rules change to allow destruction of older SS cards. Guess who fell in that range? How convenient, no?

35 posted on 05/27/2014 7:09:50 AM PDT by polymuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
A draft's used when the military can't get as many people as it needs.

That's NOT happening.

Isn't reinstituting the draft a liberal 'hate' idea and has nothing to do with what our services need?

The last person pushing the idea of a draft was Charlie Rangel... democrat... and it was done to 'stick it' to Republicans. Has something changed?

36 posted on 05/27/2014 7:13:42 AM PDT by GOPJ (Someone explain why {the MSM} uses the term 'liberal' to describe totalitarian sociopaths. BruceinOz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Why would you support a draft that not needed? It’s a liberal hate thing US Navy Vet.... you must know that...


37 posted on 05/27/2014 7:15:49 AM PDT by GOPJ (Someone explain why {the MSM} uses the term 'liberal' to describe totalitarian sociopaths. BruceinOz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
And on the flip side. There are plenty of Republicans who carelessly want to use the military for a force of good around the world without ever contemplating the fallout and risks of such actions.
38 posted on 05/27/2014 7:21:02 AM PDT by Theoria (End Socialism : No more GOP and Dem candidates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

And homosexuals. We won’t have to listen for the scream.


39 posted on 05/27/2014 7:24:55 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Putting girls into combat is sick, demented, and detrimental to military effectiveness. This is why the Globo-Marxists are pushing for it so hard.


40 posted on 05/27/2014 7:25:51 AM PDT by Count of Monte Fisto (The foundation of modern society is the denial of reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

I think all women should be required to register for the draft now, just as all men are required to.


41 posted on 05/27/2014 7:30:33 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven
In Rostker v. Goldberg (1981), the plaintiffs argued that exempting women from the draft was unconstitutionally discriminatory. The Supreme Court decided that:
Justice William Rehnquist wrote "[t]he existence of the combat restrictions clearly indicates the basis for Congress' decision to exempt women from registration. The purpose of registration was to prepare for a draft of combat troops. Since women are excluded from combat, Congress concluded that they would not be needed in the event of a draft, and therefore decided not to register them."
Allowing women into combat roles nullifies that reasoning, and re-opens the issue to a constitutionality challenge.
42 posted on 05/27/2014 7:30:48 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
After reading that a half dozen times it looks that is the author's wish (whose picture makes it look like she could lose a few pounds) and not the 5'3" woman who wants to be a Marine officer. Someone who was 5'3" with the proper weight of someone 6'3" would not be described as "petite".

We have overweight women describing themselves as "curvy". I respond "Victoria's Secret models are curvy. YOU are just fat."

43 posted on 05/27/2014 7:33:43 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Knowing these louts, they would probably include as an alternative to military service, that women could work in “pleasure services”, taking care of the ‘needs’ of bureaucrats and Obama’s “alternative army” of inner city ‘yoots’.


44 posted on 05/27/2014 7:39:47 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
"We have overweight women describing themselves as "curvy". I respond "Victoria's Secret models are curvy. YOU are just fat."/

Oh, come on, now....curves and rolls are the same thing! /S

45 posted on 05/27/2014 7:53:48 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
The purpose of registration was to prepare for a draft of combat troops.
I remember that crap decision. If it were true, then anyone drafted should have been forced into a combat MOS ... which never happened.
Also, drafting women would have provided/allowed more men to go into combat. Essentially, the same end result.
46 posted on 05/27/2014 8:02:53 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
The draft is a socialist tool, what we have now is the best way to fill the ranks. Anyone that supports the draft is in fact a socialist. In the event of war that the people do not support the government would be unable to fill the ranks.

America was unable to fill the ranks, it is why we are forced to take females.

What percentage of female was your branch of service when you were in?

47 posted on 05/27/2014 10:35:30 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

When you are having to accept 42 year old grandmothers into the military, and females, then you are having manpower problems.


48 posted on 05/27/2014 10:42:34 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: drunknsage
Considering the state of things, I’m glad I didn’t sign up. The air force wanted me for some position doing IT work, jumping out of planes, cross training with the army, to set up forward operating bases. I’m glad I didn’t.

We are all glad that you never served, but in your case, you not only never enlisted, you were practically a Commando in theory, in your own mind.

49 posted on 05/27/2014 10:47:10 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Granted, not every able-bodied male is by nature a warrior - this requires a fierce and dedicated state of mind, not an attribute equally shared across all of humanity. Which is also a reason that a forced draft will not work. Unwilling or unmotivated soldiers are more a liability than asset for any army.

In WWII 93% of that Army was drafted, and the Marines draft in every major war.

50 posted on 05/27/2014 10:50:12 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson