Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Employers Dump Workers To Health Exchanges? Yes, For A Price
Kaiser Health News ^ | May 28, 2014 | By Jay Hancock

Posted on 05/28/2014 4:59:08 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

How to expand Americans’ health insurance choices under the Affordable Care Act without sabotaging employer coverage? The Obama administration is still working to get the balance right.

The latest tweak from the Internal Revenue Service essentially prohibits employers from giving workers tax-free dollars to buy policies in the online public marketplaces created by the health law.

Nothing stops employers from canceling company plans and leaving workers to buy individual policies sold through the exchanges — as long as they pay the relevant taxes and penalties, said Christopher Condeluci, a Venable lawyer specializing in benefits and taxes. Those will vary according to a company’s size and circumstances.

If an employer has fewer than 50 workers, there is no penalty under the health law for dropping coverage or never offering it. Larger companies that don’t offer coverage may be liable for fines of $2,000 and $3,000 per worker starting next year. (The employer mandate doesn’t kick in for firms with 50 to 99 workers until 2016.)

Nor is there anything stopping companies from giving workers raises to buy individual policies on the exchanges as long as the money is taxed as income.

(Excerpt) Read more at capsules.kaiserhealthnews.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: lies; obamacare; rinocare; socialism
If you like your plan, you can keep your plan. But my plan will encourage your plan to be cancelled and switched to my plan. Period!
1 posted on 05/28/2014 4:59:08 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I’m all for divorcing health “insurance” from employment so this isn’t all bad.


2 posted on 05/28/2014 5:00:59 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Moving insurance from employment to government is a disaster. Especially with the IRS as the enforcer.


3 posted on 05/28/2014 5:03:33 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Nobody on FR thinks having govt run it is a good idea.

But when unions obtained employer health coverage as a part of WW2 wage controls, it separated the cost from the user.

And that always produces a bad outcome.


4 posted on 05/28/2014 5:06:15 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Got it, and I agree.


5 posted on 05/28/2014 5:12:45 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Nor is there anything stopping companies from giving workers raises to buy individual policies on the exchanges as long as the money is taxed as income.”

Lack of profits may well stop them from giving workers raises.


6 posted on 05/28/2014 5:14:59 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Nothing stops employers from canceling company plans and leaving workers to buy individual policies sold through the exchanges”

Nothing stops employers from firing workers because they can no longer afford them either.


7 posted on 05/28/2014 5:17:05 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Larger companies that don’t offer coverage may be liable for fines of $2,000 and $3,000 per worker starting next year.

Well, that's easy enough for businesses to cover; just cut workers' pay by $2-3 thousand dollars a year.

8 posted on 05/28/2014 8:39:02 PM PDT by seowulf (Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum. Cogito.---Ambrose Bierce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seowulf
Well, that's easy enough for businesses to cover; just cut workers' pay by $2-3 thousand dollars a year.

Well considering that the cost to the company for health insurance can be about $10-20k per employee per year (depending upon how many dependents the employee has, how good the coverage is, etc.), paying $2-3k per employee each year in fines would actually save the businesses a lot of money each year.

9 posted on 05/28/2014 11:10:07 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson