Skip to comments.Hillary Frowns On Income Inequality From Atop A Glittering Mountain Of Wealth And Privilege (VIDEO)
Posted on 05/29/2014 9:45:21 AM PDT by PoloSec
Let them eat cake. But you know, YOUR cake. Not hers.
Jerome Hudson at The Daily Surge on Wednesday pointed out a glaring, if typical, disconnect between the rhetoric and reality of Hillary Clinton in her new video promoting her new book. In the video, the former Secretary says that we have to make the "hard choices" necessary to fight the "cancer" of inequality.
"I think people will see that we are strong and well-equipped to restore prosperity here at home, to deal with the cancer of inequality," she says, adding that it "doesnt happen by accident or wishing for it or engaging in ideological and rhetorical battles." This sounds like a precursor to remarking on the value of hard work, entrepreneurial spirit, or American ingenuity. Instead, she makes the assertion that prosperity only happens when "people come together and make a series of choices, including some hard choices to establish a foundation for a strong economy, a strong united society." You know, it takes a village. Or if you prefer "you didn't build that."
Hudson points out the glaring inequity in Clinton's video about inequality.
(Excerpt) Read more at truthrevolt.org ...
You first, Criminal!
How bout you start by donating that 100 grand you got back in the 80s from the crooked commodities trades to the non-white victim of our choice (not yours - you’d extort the guy for a vote or three).
And uh, I was of course referring to Ms. Rodham as the criminal...
Will Clinton and Huma give back the 8 billion dollars
they “lost”? NEVER. Like their treason, like
the Ambassador’s murder, like the mANPAD xfer to
al Qaeda, it will CONVENIENTLY
be overlooked by the STATERUN-”journalists”.
maybe she and bill will donate more of their used underwear to “the little people”
Pray America wakes up
She looks nuts in that video. “The cancer of inequality” is the same rhetoric that was used to slaughter 100 million people or more in its name. She’s talking to a generation of idiots who know nothing of history.