Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman's Facebook Post Leads to Police Ticket
Yahoo ^ | 5-30-14 | Elise Solé

Posted on 05/31/2014 2:52:48 AM PDT by kingattax

Anything you post on Facebook can (and sometimes will) come back to haunt you. Chicago-area resident Christine Adamski discovered that the hard way when she received a police citation in the mail because of a comment she wrote on the social networking site.

The letter from the Will County Forest Preserve District stated that Adamski had brought her dog to the Whalon Lake Dog Park in Naperville, Ill., without a permit and included an application for the permit, a ticket for $50, and a printout of Adamski’s Facebook post "admitting her guilt."

The post read, “I was feeling bad that I haven’t bought a pass and been bringing Ginger there but I’m pretty glad I haven’t. So not going to worry about it until later. I hope all the doggies get better soon.” At the time, there were rumors that a bad case of kennel cough had afflicted the dogs in the park.

“People were calling and complaining about the kennel cough, but we couldn’t confirm it so an employee visited the Facebook page of the dog park for more information and that’s how we discovered Christine’s post,” Lt. Tracey Phillips of the Will County Forest Preserve District Police tells Yahoo Shine.

“We require people to get a permit to make sure all dogs are healthy and up-to-date on their shots.”

(Excerpt) Read more at shine.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 05/31/2014 2:52:48 AM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Soon enough, humans won’t be necessary to locate meandering park breachers. Hell, machine learning could help to rake in mountains of revenue by simply observing social media... the question, however... will the “sheople” permit it?


2 posted on 05/31/2014 3:04:21 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax; null and void

“It must be true, I read it on the Internet.”


3 posted on 05/31/2014 3:10:12 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Another lesson in over sharing on social media. It is a compulsion for many people and the opportunities for getting into trouble are endless.


4 posted on 05/31/2014 3:21:45 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

If what she actually posted was “I was feeling bad that I haven’t bought a pass and been bringing Ginger there”, that means the same as “I was feeling bad that I haven’t...been bringing Ginger there”. In other words, she has not admitted anything. I hope she sues the crap out of the Will County Forest Preserve District Police.


5 posted on 05/31/2014 3:38:03 AM PDT by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Loose lips sink ships.

As real criminals become too violent for law enforcement to confront, authorities are turning toward softer crimes for revenue and “work”.


6 posted on 05/31/2014 3:48:52 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

She should look on the bright side. The cops didn’t shoot her dog or pop a no knock stun grenade in her face....yet.


7 posted on 05/31/2014 3:58:32 AM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

If you publicly post an admission, don’t be surprised if somebody follows up on it.


8 posted on 05/31/2014 4:03:42 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I believe a case could be made that its up to the prosecution to prove that:

She was telling the truth
Her account hadn’t been hacked
Any pictures hadn’t been photoshopped

Still a dumbass thing to post.


9 posted on 05/31/2014 4:15:35 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Facebook - the 21st century “due process” and the digital “court of law”. Innocent before proven guilty? Not anymore.


10 posted on 05/31/2014 4:31:34 AM PDT by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
If you publicly post an admission, don’t be surprised if somebody follows up on it.

PROVE she was telling the truth.

11 posted on 05/31/2014 4:41:32 AM PDT by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Dear Facebook: I was just kidding about removing my mattress tag.


12 posted on 05/31/2014 4:41:45 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HartleyMBaldwin

IF your version of what she posted is true, she could fight the ticket, and she should.

But in the end she should probably just buy the pass and bring the dog to the park. Assuming they’ve got that cough situation cleared up.

I have no idea what kind of a place this is, you have to get a permit to walk your dog in a park?


13 posted on 05/31/2014 5:27:03 AM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

A permit to walk your dog!!!!

This is apparently on top of the annual dog license.


14 posted on 05/31/2014 5:40:11 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I wonder if they had any proof other than her comments - people say untrue things all the time and it isn’t unusual for some to come forward and confess to crimes they haven’t committed. It would seem she may have a good case to negate the citation. Just goes to show how the thought police are intruding ever further into our lives - when they can punish you because you said you did something, with no proof that you actually did it, we have lost.


15 posted on 05/31/2014 5:48:28 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

What do you mean by IF my version is true? My post had to do with the simple grammatical meaning of what she allegedly posted on Facebook.

I do not have a “version” of what the woman actually put on Facebook, nor will I ever know firsthand, because I have nothing to do with Facebook.

As for what kind of place this is, the article mentions “Chicago-area”, which might provide a clue.


16 posted on 05/31/2014 5:49:51 AM PDT by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

The answer to this would be for everyone in the area to start posting ridiculous (but fictional) misdemeanors that they had supposedly committed at that park; i.e I littered in the park, I brought seventeen dogs to the park, I jaywalked all around the park, I exposed myself in broad daylight, I took an elephant to the park, ....


17 posted on 05/31/2014 5:57:37 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

“He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.”


18 posted on 05/31/2014 6:18:54 AM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

If you read the article, she eventually explains that she meant she was feeling bad about not bringing the dog to the park, but was glad she hadn’t been bringing the dog to the park after all because of the kennel cough problem. The ticket was dropped after she explained her comment.

She also commented on the Facebook page for the dog park, NOT on her own Facebook page. Kind of different as far as privacy expectations, I’d say.


19 posted on 05/31/2014 6:32:52 AM PDT by ReagansShinyHair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

I’ve seen people sound palpably worse on Facebook than they do in this one, a pseudonymous forum where nobody need reveal his true identity against his will.

It’s a new modern venue of mischief. Will it defeat God’s purpose? NO WAY.


20 posted on 05/31/2014 6:33:32 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

She should challenge them for proof it happened! Yes, baldly.


21 posted on 05/31/2014 6:34:15 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ReagansShinyHair

I hope it embarrassed the ticketeers.


22 posted on 05/31/2014 6:35:03 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I remember about 10 years ago there was some Democrat government official hauled before a panel or court or something, and he was confronted with a copy of his ‘daily journal’ which had entries in it that conflicted with his testimony. His defense was “I lied to my journal.” No sh!t.

He apparently got away with it, IIRC because the media let it drop.

If I were this woman, I’d go before the court and plead not guilty and tell the judge I “lied to my FaceBook page” because I was trying to make friends. I’d then ask the judge to have animal control or whoever provide separate evidence (other than the lies I told to myself). If none, then I’d request the judge drop the case.


23 posted on 05/31/2014 6:50:56 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

A permit to walk you dog in a park? Sounds more like Nazi Germany than America. Were I her, I would fight this unconstitutional ticket. BTW, Gaffer, nice to visit with you here and on AMG.


24 posted on 05/31/2014 7:16:14 AM PDT by Tudorfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

What’s a face book?


25 posted on 05/31/2014 7:40:01 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

It’s something that half of FReepers utilize and enjoy and that the other half calls the devil’s tool. And that one FReeper has never heard of. :)


26 posted on 05/31/2014 8:57:40 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido; All
 photo cooltable.jpg

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


27 posted on 05/31/2014 9:00:10 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

28 posted on 05/31/2014 10:35:37 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HartleyMBaldwin; ReagansShinyHair

Hartley, I was not trying to be argumentative, I did not read it that closely. I’m posting to thank reagansshinyhair (most amusing name btw) for his details and just in case you didn’t see his post.


29 posted on 05/31/2014 1:37:27 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tudorfly

I don’t think it’s just a regular park - it’s a “dog park” where you can let your dog run off leash and there are usually some equipment type thingies around for the dogs to play on. The permit pays for upkeep on the dog park, and makes it so that the dogs that are off-leash (and sniffing each other) have had their shots so they don’t make each other sick. A permit sounds reasonable for something like this. I’d liken it to paying admission to a city-run pool. $50 sounds pretty high to me, but I don’t know much about running a dog park. I’m not the type of person to take my dog to a dog park, either.

I think the headline was sensationalist and designed to inflame, and it doesn’t reflect what truly happened in this case. I’m tired of headlines like that.


30 posted on 06/02/2014 6:11:28 PM PDT by ReagansShinyHair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ReagansShinyHair

And that’s what makes perfect sense in the context of the info about the sick dogs.

The ticket trolls must spend their days sniffing for cash.


31 posted on 06/02/2014 6:20:25 PM PDT by Ezekiel (All who mourn the destruction of America merit the celebration of her rebirth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ReagansShinyHair

A variety of other taxes have already paid for the park (property taxes, and depending on the city, sales taxes). Plus the taxes (fees) associated with obtaining a dog license. One should not have to pay another fee to simply use an existing city owned park, in which one can walk through, without a dog, with no additional fees required.

And a ticket by mail, based on a FB post? Unconstitutional, in my partially educated view.


32 posted on 06/03/2014 8:09:26 AM PDT by Tudorfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tudorfly

I prefer to have the tax paid by the people who actually use the dog area of the park, rather than raise taxes on everyone regardless of whether or not they use the dog area.


33 posted on 06/03/2014 8:36:57 AM PDT by ReagansShinyHair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson