Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here are the Taliban Terrorists Obama Released to Free POW
daily Beast ^ | 5/31/14 | Rogin

Posted on 05/31/2014 8:04:21 PM PDT by mgist

Lake, Josh RoginMay 31, 2014 3:12 pm EDT In exchange for Army Sgt. Bowe Berghdahl, the U.S. has released five senior Taliban commanders from the Guantanamo Bay prison. They are considered some of the worst of the worst.

The five Guantanamo detainees released by the Obama administration in exchange for America’s last prisoner of war in Afghanistan, Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, are bad guys. They are top Taliban commanders the group has tried to free for more than a decade.

U.S. Army/AP According to a 2008 Pentagon dossier on Guantanamo Bay inmates, all five men released were considered to be a high risk to launch attacks against the United States and its allies if they were liberated. The exchange shows that the Obama administration was willing to pay a steep price, indeed, for Bergdahl’s freedom. The administration says they will be transferred to Qatar, which played a key role in the negotiations.

In the initial statements released about the deal, the White House declined to name the detainees who would be leaving the Cuba based prison Obama has been trying to close since his first day in office.

A senior U.S. defense official confirmed Saturday that the prisoners to be released include Mullah Mohammad Fazl, Mullah Norullah Noori, Abdul Haq Wasiq, Khairullah Khairkhwa and Mohammed Nabi Omari.

While not as well known as Guantanamo inmates like 9-11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the Taliban 5 were some of the worst outlaws in the U.S. war on terror. And their release will end up replenishing the diminished leadership ranks of the Afghan Taliban at a moment when the United States is winding down the war there.

“They are undoubtedly among the most dangerous Taliban commanders held at Guantanamo,” said Thomas Joscelyn, a senior editor at the Long War Journal who keeps a close watch on developments concerning the detainees left at the Guantanamo Bay prison.

Fazl, for example, was the Taliban’s former deputy defense minister and is wanted by the United Nations for his role in massacres targeting Afghan’s Shi’ite Muslim population.

According to the 2008 Pentagon’s dossier on Fazl disclosed by Wikileaks (PDF), Noori also was a senior Taliban military figure and, according to his Pentagon dossier, was asked personally in 1995 by Osama bin Laden (PDF) to participate in an offensive against northern alliance warlord Rashid Dostum.

Wasiq, a former deputy minister of intelligence, at one point tried to cooperate with U.S. forces in Afghanistan and asked for a GPS system as well as a special radio to communicate with the U.S. military after the U.S. invasion in 2001. His dossier (PDF) says that he was a crucial liaison between the Taliban and other Islamic fundamentalist groups while he was deputy intelligence minister. But the 2008 report also said he was holding out information he had on other top al Qaeda and Taliban leaders during interrogations.

Khairkhwa, a former Taliban governor of Herat, was considered by the Pentagon’s 2008 dossier to be a likely heroin trafficker (PDF). That dossier also says he likely participated in meetings with Iranian officials after 9-11 to help plot attacks on U.S. forces following the invasion.

Iran has worked in some cases with the government that has replaced the Taliban in Afghanistan, but also has been accused by the U.S. military of supplying the Taliban and other insurgent groups with roadside bombs known as improvised explosive devices of IEDs.

Nabi held several military leadership posts for the Taliban and helped organize the al Qaeda/Taliban militias that fought against U.S. and coalition troops in the first year of the war, according to his Pentagon dossier (PDF).

This week’s secret diplomacy was not the first time the U.S. government had engaged the Taliban in an effort to negotiate a prisoner swap for the release of Bergdahl. In 2011, State Department officials held a series of meetings with Taliban leaders in Doha.

In Congress, there was bipartisan opposition to any release of Guantanamo prisoners. After the negotiations were made public in early 2012 by Sen. Dianne Feinstein the Taliban announced they were pulling out of the talks.

In the summer of 2013, the U.S. attempted a Taliban confidence building measure, the opening of a Taliban representative office in the diplomatic enclave inside Doha, Qatar. Karzai was also mistrustful of that effort and his skepticism was validated when the Taliban violated their agreement with the U.S. and raised their flag at the office’s opening, causing Karzai to have a fit and forcing the U.S. to abandon the deal to keep the Taliban office open.

Talks resumed in late 2013 and the Taliban provided a video proof of life to the U.S. military in December 2013, which had been a condition for the U.S. to continue with the negotiations.

Many in Congress will still be opposed to the swap, but lawmakers gave up their right to stop it. A small change in the Fiscal Year 2014 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which passed last December, now makes it only a requirement that the Defense Secretary notify Congress when releasing Guantanamo prisoners. Before the change, Congressional sign off on any Guantanamo releases would have been needed.

At about 10:30 am eastern standard time, Bergdahl was released from his captors. The handover was peaceful and happened in eastern Afghanistan along the border, according to a senior U.S. Defense official. U.S. special operations forces conducted the rescue.

The official said that once he was on the helicopter, Bergdahl wrote on a paper plate (writing instead of talking because it was so loud) “SF?” The operators sitting with Bergdahl responded loudly, saying, yes, we’ve been looking for you for a long time. Bergdahl broke down crying, the official relayed.

In exchange for Bergdahl’s release, five detainees at Guantanamo Bay will be released to Qatar. The US has “appropriate assurances” that Qatar will be able to secure the detainees there, a U.S. official said. The detainees are under a travel ban for a year.

The transfer took place quickly without incident, peacefully and without violence. There were approximately 18 Taliban on site.

U.S. officials believe Bergdahl had been held for the bulk of his captivity in Pakistan. They’re not sure when he was moved to Afghanistan.

The transfer was not negotiated with the Haqqani network, a network of former Pakistani defense officials and other designated terrorists. Instead it was brokered through the Qatari government.

Bergdahl’s parents happened to be in Washington when the news broke. They had come from their home in Idaho for Memorial Day.

Bergdahl is currently being held at a forward operating base in Afghanistan. He will be there until doctors are ready to let him go, and his next move will be to Bagram only when he’s ready.

The U.S. official praised this operation as a show of interagency cooperation—it was a whole-government effort that he said had been in the works for five years. “We really got traction in the last week but we never lost sight of Bergdahl,” he said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; bobbergdahl; bowebergdahl; gitmo; obama; taliban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-52 next last
So they ignore the hit on Americans in Benghazi, and let out numerous high level terrorists and whomare considered treats to US, for 1 soldier. Hmmm
1 posted on 05/31/2014 8:04:21 PM PDT by mgist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mgist

This Administration is building one HELLUVA ‘legacy,’ I tell you what! *SNORT*

I sure hope we survive this. The next 9/11 is going to be spectacular! Possibly nuclear! And the one after that, and the one after that, and...

Wonder if this solider feels his life was worth this? As a Vet, I’m kinda doubting it.


2 posted on 05/31/2014 8:08:39 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist


3 posted on 05/31/2014 8:10:00 PM PDT by garjog (Obama: making the world safe for Sharia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist

All very convenient for the taliban loving Mohammed Barack Hussein Obama


4 posted on 05/31/2014 8:10:50 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist
Impeachment should begin the day the Republican Congress is sworn in.
5 posted on 05/31/2014 8:11:06 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist

I have to be happy the US soldier is freed. I imagine his family is beyond elated.

Now track the 5 bastards in Qatar and kill everyone of them.


6 posted on 05/31/2014 8:11:32 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garjog

Yup.
He’s a Moslem at heart...


7 posted on 05/31/2014 8:11:57 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mgist

The POS is doing everything he CAN DO to act like he CARES about VETS next stop Beaches of Normandy just sickening, this fricken VET
deserted wandered away from base and now this POS POTUS puts
our soldiers in jeopardy releasing 5 top terrorists to do a Rose Garden
photo op with the parents of this loser deserter!!!!!


8 posted on 05/31/2014 8:12:30 PM PDT by Kit cat (OBummer must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist

Put that locator exploding transponder in ‘em and send ‘em back.


9 posted on 05/31/2014 8:13:59 PM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum -- "The Taliban is inside the building")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist

Look for more kidnappings of US soldiers in the coming days.


10 posted on 05/31/2014 8:14:16 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist

Dumb question...

Barry had a photo op with this soldier’s parents tonight....in Washington.

Doesn’t this family live in Idaho?

Did this family fly in for the photo op?

If so...who paid for it?


11 posted on 05/31/2014 8:14:27 PM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kit cat

I am very curious about the logistics of the photo op. Were my tax dollars used to bring the parents from Idaho to DC?


12 posted on 05/31/2014 8:18:18 PM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mgist
Obama used this poor soldier as a political pawn to get the VA scandal off of the front page.

Is this trade even legal if Obama was involved? Not that legality matters with those on Capitol Hill.

13 posted on 05/31/2014 8:18:41 PM PDT by bayliving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist

WE DO NOT NEGOTIATE WITH TERRORISTS

very well

- 0bama


14 posted on 05/31/2014 8:18:49 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lacrew
Something is not right.

His father learned Pashto so he could communicate with his captors. WTH(eck). The parents talked with his captors?

News pointed out he was in good enough condition to walk a long distance after his release. Coherent enough to communicate with transport operators.

Lots of questions about how he was captured to begin with. This story is a long time from being over.

15 posted on 05/31/2014 8:21:36 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

The parents “just happened” to be in DC.

Mere coincidence.

(not buying it)


16 posted on 05/31/2014 8:23:15 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mgist

How about exchanging a few million of the worst Mexican drug thugs from our prisons in exchange for that Marine sergeant being held there.


17 posted on 05/31/2014 8:25:05 PM PDT by shove_it (long ago Orwell and Rand warned us of Obama's America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garjog; All

It is worth repeating.

Confused about Obama’s foreign policy? With Clinton’s foreign policy?

You are likely familiar with the “Hierarchy of Needs” - Things a human MUST have in order survive: for a minute, for an hour, for a day, for a week, for a year, etc. Until those needs are met, he or she cannot look for less important things. Air, water, food, clothing, shelter, etc .. All can get ranked according to a human’s most important priorities.

Now consider every foreign policy decision, speech, foreign leader, foreign trip (well - except vacations), and foreign award or recognition Obama has chosen since 2008.

Think about his hierarchy of hatred, then look at his decisions. His administration’s decisions.

In every case, when given a public choice, Obama has chosen American over Israeli;

American (if democrat-donor or government-enhanced) over republican/capitalist/energy/white/male/oil/red state;

European-republics over America;

European-socialist governments over European-republics;

3rd world socialist-republics over European-socialist governments;

socialist-selected governments over socialist-elected governments;

socialist-dictatorships over socialist-selected governments;

communist governments over socialist dictatorships;

Islamic republics over communist governments;

Islamic secular states over Islamic republics;

Islamic dictatorships over Islamic secular states;

Islamic-tolerant states over Islamic dictatorships;

Islamic religious states over Islamic-tolerant states;

Islamic Sharia states over Islamic religious states;

Islamic fundamentalist states over Islamic Sharia-compliant states;

Radical Islamic bands over Islamic fundamentalist states.


18 posted on 05/31/2014 8:25:41 PM PDT by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mgist

If Obama can figure out how to have 20 more of our soldiers kidnapped, he could release enough terrorists to finally fulfill his dream of closing Guantanamo.


19 posted on 05/31/2014 8:29:07 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

What jumped out at me was the Taliban beard the father had as he and zip walked out to the camera. The whole thing stinks rotten.


20 posted on 05/31/2014 8:30:38 PM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

For more Obama outrages check out my blog devoted to the subject.

If nothing else than for a few laughs.

http://obamaclarifier.blogspot.com


21 posted on 05/31/2014 8:33:15 PM PDT by garjog (Obama: making the world safe for Sharia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
The detainees are under a travel ban for a year.

Relax! These guys won't fly any planes into buildings for at least one year. I'm sure the Barney Fife's at TSA will dutifully check their identification and compare it against the no-fly list. So BO assured us. < / sarcasm >

22 posted on 05/31/2014 8:36:28 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mgist

Thing is he is going to let them all free very soon, might as well get some cred for getting our guy back now.


23 posted on 05/31/2014 8:50:08 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist
This has nothing to do with freeing an American POW. NOTHING.

It has EVERYTHING to do with the VA scandal. Obama needs a distractor, something to show that he is pro-military, something to show that he cares. Make no mistake. This is not about a POW. This is - as usual - all about Obama.

24 posted on 05/31/2014 8:57:33 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist

New chant- the Taliban is alive, GM is owned by China


25 posted on 05/31/2014 9:03:30 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist
.... Well .... Now we know why Obama really went to Afghanistan ......

.... heck ... it definitely looks like "Deals" were made and "Signals" probably sent to operatives for quid pro quo to be enacted. My guess is probably to bolster the faltering and tarnished image top the masses of our "Good Guy" President's facade while at the same time allowing the "Demon Nation of America" to be delivered just a little bit closer into the arms of the mighty Allah for her punishment and destruction.

..... Naaaaaaw ... the President of the United States would never do that to the nation he was chosen and elected by the people to protect ..... would he?

26 posted on 05/31/2014 9:25:38 PM PDT by R_Kangel ( "A Nation of Sheep ..... Will Beget ..... a Nation Ruled by Wolves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist; blueyon; KitJ; T Minus Four; xzins; CMS; The Sailor; ab01; txradioguy; Jet Jaguar; ...

Active Duty ping.


27 posted on 05/31/2014 9:26:34 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Resist in place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
"The law requires the defense secretary to notify relevant congressional committees at least 30 days before making any transfers of prisoners, to explain the reason and to provide assurances that those released would not be in a position to reengage in activities that could threaten the United States or its interests."

"Lawmakers were not notified of the Guantanamo detainees’ transfer until after it occurred."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/bergdahl-release-arrangement-could-threaten-the-safety-of-americans-republicans-say/2014/05/31/35e47a2a-e8ff-11e3-afc6-a1dd9407abcf_print.html

Obama broke the law,,, will anyone act to hold the punk accountable??

28 posted on 05/31/2014 9:34:35 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Yep! Now wouldn’t it be a shame if something happened to those five....


29 posted on 05/31/2014 9:38:26 PM PDT by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

all 5 of them better have tracking deviced stuffed so far up their a$$es that only a Hellfire missle can find it.


30 posted on 05/31/2014 9:43:40 PM PDT by Finatic (Sometimes I think it would be nice to just get it on and get it over with. Once and for all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey

And the father of the deserter/”hostage” wants to avenge the death of Afghan children...

The new normal business as usual in America.

Where is the press on that? Even the defense press goes chirp chirp...


31 posted on 05/31/2014 10:45:25 PM PDT by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

So much logic and consistency in this trade. /s


32 posted on 05/31/2014 11:01:23 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Send in the Drones.
Time for a doublecross


33 posted on 05/31/2014 11:10:51 PM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mgist

Aiding the enemy. Isn’t that treason?


34 posted on 05/31/2014 11:43:25 PM PDT by kaehurowing (FIGHT BULLYING, UNINSTALL FIREFOX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist

Obama will laugh it off. What will Republicans do? Bash the president who ‘freed’ a US soldier in captivity? Yeah, that’ll play well to the useful idiots that smell Obama’s pants. I can hear it now...

“Well, you got some folks in the republican party, who want to imprison US soldiers for political gains.” -Barry Soetero


35 posted on 06/01/2014 12:02:45 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Track these guys.
That is what I was thinking.
Put a GPS tracking bug in their body somewhere and wait for them to reunite with their buddies. Have a drone circling over head and boom. No more bad guys.


36 posted on 06/01/2014 3:11:54 AM PDT by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

And the second day the newly elected Republican Senate will vote for Conviction and Removal. And on the third day, let us all welcome our new President: President Joe Biden ...


37 posted on 06/01/2014 3:21:18 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kit cat

He did not wander off base, rather he went off to visit his ‘moderate’ Muslim ‘friends’ in the community. He was seemingly raised by hippie wannabe parents to whom ‘diversity’ is a good thing. He was just following his early training by giving “peace a chance”.

Just another John Phillip Walker Lindh in the making.

It might also be added that our Dear Leader did not bother notifying Congress as He is required. He knows that the “Muslim World” will see Him in a good light, now that He has released five of their most notable leaders to Qatar, from where they will somehow ‘escape’.


38 posted on 06/01/2014 3:36:13 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

I’m also very positive that the most dangerous of the Taliban leaders will honor this commitment by the Qataris, and likewise the Qataris will not look the other way should these dangerous men happen to ‘accidentally’ travel elsewhere.


39 posted on 06/01/2014 3:53:48 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

Of course, it is treason, but the charge can only legally be made if Congress declares war with a named enemy country ... something Congress was careful not to do.


40 posted on 06/01/2014 3:59:00 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mgist

Caliban bows to the Taliban.


41 posted on 06/01/2014 4:07:04 AM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist

He was NOT a POW he was a deserter. . .


42 posted on 06/01/2014 4:11:27 AM PDT by DeaconRed (Deodorant and Common sense. The ones who need it most don't use it. . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
"Something is not right."

Understatement of the year.
The so called POW was a deserter.
Read the post on other threads, one from a soldier that was there when he deserted. . . .

43 posted on 06/01/2014 4:16:32 AM PDT by DeaconRed (Deodorant and Common sense. The ones who need it most don't use it. . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise

Tis a twist that wont see the light of day in the Big Media

Thanks!


44 posted on 06/01/2014 5:52:55 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mgist

This was no prisoner exchange. Obama wanted some way to get these guys out of Guantanamo. This was a good excuse to release some. Obama is probably hoping for another prisoner exchange so he can accomplish his ultimate goal of closing Gitmo. Worst president we’ve ever had.


45 posted on 06/01/2014 5:57:04 AM PDT by ThomasMore (Islam is the Whore of Babylon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist

People are looking at this the wrong way when they argue that the US is breaking it’s policy of trading for hostages. The more natural way to look at it is that Obama wanted to release these high-level terrorists, and Bergdahl provided the excuse. It makes sense when you turn it around and consider him playing for the other side. /S


46 posted on 06/01/2014 6:04:44 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore

We all got the same impression from this article. “Something isn’t right”.

Nothing Obama does makes sense because it is all staged, deceptive, and comes with ulterior motives.

At least he is consistent in that. I do notice the media including more tids bits of truth, while being very careful not to appear critical.

The media in this country is afraid. There is a difference with the blatant PR, and the WH talking points fed to the press who have the same feeling we do.


47 posted on 06/01/2014 6:14:28 AM PDT by mgist (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey
Remember the stupid Boland amendment that they tied around Reagan's neck? Time to play even!
48 posted on 06/01/2014 7:20:19 AM PDT by RushingWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RushingWater

Nuke Mecca Now!


49 posted on 06/01/2014 7:21:51 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Finatic
all 5 of them better have tracking deviced stuffed so far up their a$$es that only a Hellfire missle can find it.

DITTO THAT!

50 posted on 06/01/2014 10:08:34 AM PDT by shove_it (long ago Orwell and Rand warned us of Obama's America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson