Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oklahoma House Seeks to Impeach Half of Their Liberal Supreme Court
Conservative Tribune ^ | Unknown | Unknown

Posted on 06/02/2014 1:55:20 PM PDT by SgtHooper

Two Oklahoma death row inmates (whose crimes both involved the brutal rape and murder of children) sued the government in order to find out the source of the drugs used in the lethal injection that they would receive. After the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals gave the go-ahead for the executions, the state’s Supreme Court granted an indefinite appeal to the inmates. However, an Oklahoma House member drafted a resolution to impeach the justices who granted the stay, precipitating a 180 degree turnaround by the OK Supreme Court.

From The Guardian: The Oklahoma supreme court has dissolved its stay of the executions of two men who challenged the state’s secrecy about its source of lethal injection drugs. The court reversed the decision of a district court judge who said the law that keeps the source secret is unconstitutional.


TOPICS: Government; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: impeach; justices; oklahoma
This is how we need to handle liberal scumbag judges/justices. I hope OK legislature tosses these scumbags down the steps of the OSC building.
1 posted on 06/02/2014 1:55:20 PM PDT by SgtHooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

OK folks, let’s have some follow through and actually impeach them and remove them from office.


2 posted on 06/02/2014 1:58:32 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

Utterly absurd. Impeach because you don’t like a ruling? Rulings of this type aren’t just about “bad people” they involve government secrecy etc. And a ruling you don’t like is NOT a reason to impeach a judge. Bet the Libs would LOVE impeaching 5 of the SCOTUS Justices. To be consistent I assume that’s OK with some of you?

Those of you calling for anarchy, have a good time with that. If you think you’ll win that one ... well, I needed a good laugh.


3 posted on 06/02/2014 2:05:19 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
OK folks, let’s have some follow through and actually impeach them and remove them from office.

Along with imprisonment.

4 posted on 06/02/2014 2:10:07 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Prepare to be deservedly flamed.


5 posted on 06/02/2014 2:10:30 PM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

“The court’s reversal on Wednesday came hours after a resolution by an Oklahoma House member to try to impeach some of its justices.

In removing the stay, the court said the inmates had failed to demonstrate “actual injury” and that “the right of access to the courts does not include the right to discover a cause of action” to litigate.”

“Not satisfied with the Supreme Court’s reversal, articles of impeachment have been filed against the five justices who voted for the stay. The articles charge that they improperly exercised jurisdiction over a case in which the Court of Criminal Appeals had sole jurisdiction.”

“Sole Jurisdiction” are the key words!


6 posted on 06/02/2014 2:11:40 PM PDT by SgtHooper (This is not my tag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

The OKSC had no jurisidction...


7 posted on 06/02/2014 2:14:00 PM PDT by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

Shoulda kept reading before posting like I normally do, but a post upthread was just too obnoxious to ignore.

Thanks for posting additional information.


8 posted on 06/02/2014 2:15:13 PM PDT by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
Impeach because you don’t like a ruling?

More like impeach because a ruling is so wrong that the people that ruled that way need to be off the bench.

Your close association with the so called 'justice' system biases you.

/johnny

9 posted on 06/02/2014 2:16:54 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

Excellent move by Oklahoma and one that should be followed by every state and the Republicans in the US House and Senate.

Each time a judge rules against American Values, the Bible or an originalist interpretation of the Constitution, we move to impeach.


10 posted on 06/02/2014 2:18:23 PM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

I’m sure their constitution says their justices serve “on good behavior.” That’s their call if they find their behavior is beyond the pale.

I like Alabama’s system, where justices have to stand for election. The US Supremes have repeatedly made themselves political animals, and they should be treated accordingly. This depravedly “independent” judiciary at the national level is the one grave mistake our Founders made.


11 posted on 06/02/2014 2:19:36 PM PDT by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Years ago Californians voted out Chief Justice Rose Bird and two other judges sitting on the California Supreme court. Other than voting in Reagan twice, the best thing the state’s voters ever did.


12 posted on 06/02/2014 2:20:19 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SZonian
The OKSC had no jurisidction...

If the decision that was appealed was from a state district court, then yes they do.

13 posted on 06/02/2014 2:24:46 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

‘Those of you calling for anarchy, have a good time with that. If you think you’ll win that one ... well, I needed a good laugh.’
Impeachment=Anarchy. I hadn’t heard that one. I guess the Big 0 is safe then.
I have no problem with the Okies impeaching judges that are insane. Matter of fact I am for impeaching everyone in the Big 0’s administration that can be impeached for unAmerican activities or whatever, just being ugly is enough for me.
I get the feeling that maybe freedom=anarchy with you. Tell me if I am wrong.


14 posted on 06/02/2014 2:29:56 PM PDT by Foundahardheadedwoman (God don't have a statute of limitations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3162832/posts?page=6#6

Does the Court of Criminal Appeals meet that criteria?


15 posted on 06/02/2014 2:34:34 PM PDT by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I lived in California when Bird was legislating from the bench. Sadly, while what she did was so extreme back then that it got her booted off the court, it is now standard M.O. for liberal judges.

If the court wants their decisions to be respected, then they need to be respectable. We are slouching toward anarchy under the current regime and they are too dense to see that there is a breaking point.

16 posted on 06/02/2014 2:34:40 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper
“Sole Jurisdiction” are the key words!

The argument could be made that this demand that the state disclose the source of the drugs is a civil matter and does not fall under the jurisdiction of the Court of Criminal Appeal. And there's an out: "...the Court of Criminal Appeals shall have exclusive appellate jurisdiction in criminal cases until otherwise provided by statute and in the event there is any conflict as to jurisdiction, the Supreme Court shall determine which court has jurisdiction and such determination shall be final."

17 posted on 06/02/2014 2:36:00 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

I agree.


18 posted on 06/02/2014 2:43:19 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper
You've posted an old article.

They botched the execution but the guy finally died 30 minutes after they closed the curtain.

But the other death row inmate now has a stay because they have to do a 6 month investigation on why they botched the execution.

19 posted on 06/02/2014 2:50:24 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
The articles charge that they improperly exercised jurisdiction over a case in which the Court of Criminal Appeals had sole jurisdiction.”

Seems pretty clear to me.....

Sole jurisdiction...means what it says.

20 posted on 06/02/2014 2:59:29 PM PDT by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
Just hire an anesthesiologist....they can kill you painlessly in a heartbeat.

I don't why it's so hard.....

21 posted on 06/02/2014 3:08:58 PM PDT by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
Those of you calling for anarchy, have a good time with that.

Anarchy? Really? From an elected member of the Oklahoma House?

Since when is a co-equal branch of a government exercising its oversight power considered to be "anarchy?"

-PJ

22 posted on 06/02/2014 3:14:05 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

you do not impeach judges for rulings you do not like..

you impeach them for UNCONSTITUTIONAL rulings...

ginberg said she looks to foreign law for her rulings..

SHE should be impeached, along with a whole host of federal level judges..

but, the house will not even bring them up on charges..

because of thinking, just like...YOURS...


23 posted on 06/02/2014 3:29:10 PM PDT by joe fonebone (a socialist is just a juvenile communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

180 because the threat of losing that paycheck! Further evidence of BS walks and Money talks!
Should have never been an issue! A strong Rope needs no chemical analysis.


24 posted on 06/02/2014 3:33:26 PM PDT by DocJhn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Judges often have No accountability.
Worthless political hacks get put in these positions then have various cases steered to them where they give horse crap legal positions which are most often overturned but still take forever to complete. By which time judge worthless is retired.
Hang em instead.
Sorry,just kidding.


25 posted on 06/02/2014 3:43:32 PM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) obammy lied and lied and lied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Do you smell something burning?


26 posted on 06/02/2014 6:13:38 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

...And a ruling you don’t like is NOT a reason to impeach a judge. ...
*************************************
Agree with that. However, the OK Supremes ruled it unconstitutional NOT to disclose the source of the drugs used in executions. ......Nothing about that involved the State constitution.


27 posted on 06/02/2014 11:33:22 PM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson