Posted on 06/03/2014 6:06:41 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
The White House is providing a detailed defense of its decision to swap Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl for five senior leaders of the Taliban without notifying Congress first.
National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden on Tuesday morning said the administration determined that the federal statute requiring the administration to give Congress 30-days notice before transferring a detainee from Guantanamo Bay to a foreign country did not apply to the Bergdahl case because it was a "unique set of circumstances."
“The administration determined that the notification requirement should be construed not to apply to this unique set of circumstances, in which the transfer would secure the release of a captive U.S. soldier and the secretary of Defense, acting on behalf of the president, has determined that providing notice as specified in the statute could endanger the soldier’s life,” Hayden said in a statement.
In this case, she said, delaying the transfer in order to provide the 30-day notice would “interfere with the executive’s performance of two related functions that the Constitution assigns to the president: protecting the lives of Americans abroad and protecting U.S. soldiers.”
“Because such interference would significantly alter the balance between Congress and the President, and could even raise constitutional concerns, we believe it is fair to conclude that Congress did not intend that the administration would be barred from taking the action it did in these circumstances,” she said.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
White House rationale = Oil Water
So the President is claiming he doesn’t need to follow the law because of “a unique set of circumstances?” Isn’t every case a unique set of circumstances. Isn’t this just nothing more, really, than the President claiming that he doesn’t EVER have to follow the law?
www.house.gov
www.senate.gov
Call your Congressman and Senators. tell them you consider this an act of treason against the US and the President has now endangered all of America with another 9/11 attack by releasing these dangerous criminals.
Tell them you expect them to uphold their oath to the Constitution.
The President must be impeached and removed from office for this treacherous act. That is the remedy under the constitution.
My reps are all Dems, but they heard from me this morning.
If you do nothing, nothing will change.
Maybe Obama’s trying to start a war...
I do nother believe that there is a tradition of always swapping for our POWs. That is a lie elevated to a myth. We’ve had POWs imprisoned for years.
I keep hearing on the news. ..well, we had to bring him home. No we didn’t vv
Unrelenting, blatant LIES! Benghazi, IRS, VA, $6 Billion missing and on and on and on...
Does their rational break down this way “Considering all the factors and current presidential disdain of the Constitution.....................................FU!”
Legal is one question. Motivation, judgement, competence, risk, are the others.
It is one thing to swap a POW for a POW. In this case, Bergdahl had effectively resigned from the military when he walked off the base with no intention to return. Hence he was at best a kidnap victim and at worst a traitor.
Additionally the prisoners we held in Afghanistan were not captured in Uniform and as such were not POW’s.
This was simply a trade of terrorists for traitors.
The were no POWs here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.