Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Auckland city council subsidizes event on ‘queer polyamory’ relationships
LifeSite News ^ | June 6, 2014 | Michele Kaufman

Posted on 06/07/2014 12:49:59 PM PDT by ReformationFan

Residents in Auckland, New Zealand are questioning their council’s decision to subsidize a one-day conference exploring “queer polyamory” relationships.

The Auckland Council, which serves New Zealand’s largest population, recently gave grants to various homosexual organizations, but it is the conference on polyamory that is causing a stir.

Entitled “Poly Panel, Discussions around Queer Polyamory” is described on GayNZ as “a one day event exploring a framework of ethical, healthy polyamory relationships.”

An advertisement for the event states: “Along with questioning heteronormativity, many LGBTI people question monogamous marriages and relationships.”

According to the advertisement, the event aims to “break down some of the isolation and misunderstanding that sometimes surrounds non-monogamous (and polyamorous) relationships.”

(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: auckland; citycouncil; culturaldecay; homosexualagenda; nz; polyamory; polygamy
Remember when the libs used to say things like "acceptance of homosexuality will NEVER lead to acceptance of polyamory and polygamy."
1 posted on 06/07/2014 12:49:59 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan
I think they said it wouldn't lead to polygony:

2 posted on 06/07/2014 1:10:07 PM PDT by palmer (There's someone in my lead but it's not me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Why do they need to force others to pay for their perversion, do they think it shares the guilt with taxpayers when they do that?


3 posted on 06/07/2014 1:11:24 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

4 posted on 06/07/2014 1:12:12 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2Million USD for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

I’m not homophobic but I am homonauseous.


5 posted on 06/07/2014 1:27:32 PM PDT by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

I’m surprised they haven’t yet legalized interspecies marriage down there. All those sheep, you know.


6 posted on 06/07/2014 1:30:25 PM PDT by RichInOC ("Baaaa!" "What?" "BAAAA!!" "Of COURSE I'll respect you in the morning.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gorush

Satan is loving using the queer / faggots / butt pirates / Homo-Nazis to further his agenda of destroying one of the cornerstones of society.


7 posted on 06/07/2014 1:32:15 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

The sheep don’t want to marry an inferior species


8 posted on 06/07/2014 1:34:14 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Well, at least that’s money they can’t spend on military vehicles for no-knock drug raids. :)


9 posted on 06/07/2014 1:35:36 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL-GALT-DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan


10 posted on 06/07/2014 1:36:28 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

It follows that the only way a bi-sexual can attain marital bliss is to marry two people, a man and a woman.

Clearly if we must allow homosexual marriages, then we must allow bi-sexual marriages.

Say a bi-sexual woman wants to marry a bisexual man and the bisexual man she marries is involved in a homosexual relationship with another man, then we would have to allow at least four adults in this marriage. And if the bisexual woman she wants to marry is in a heterosexual relationship with another man, then we’d have to add at least one more to this marriage in order to make this a true LGBT marriage.

Of course the animal lovers will be left out in the cold. That’s not fair.


11 posted on 06/07/2014 1:58:34 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

YAWN

so whats new about homosexuals in new Zealand...

during the 60s Wellington was the San Francisco of New Zealand...

While homosexuals weren’t welcome in Auckland or Christchurch, wellington was wide open with popular queer on every street...and the “girls” dressed to the nines at the better hotel bars...

they were not “hiding in the shadows”...

They were hanging out and entertaining at the queer follies...


12 posted on 06/07/2014 2:03:16 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Wellington was wide open with popular queer bars on every street...


13 posted on 06/07/2014 2:04:01 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity
"The sheep don’t want to
marry an inferior species"
sharp/short/concise observation.
..that's gonna leave a *baaaaad!* mark.

14 posted on 06/07/2014 2:05:34 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Bathhouse/"Rustler" Reid? d8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

Indeed. But maybe we could send Woody Allen down there?


15 posted on 06/07/2014 2:12:00 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity; All
"Woody Allen & Gene Wilder/sheep"
Was never the same after, EveryYWTKASex, ButWATAsk
and after the brawl w/Mia Farrow

16 posted on 06/07/2014 2:20:27 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Bathhouse/"Rustler" Reid? d8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

I have to admit we were rolling In the aisles laughing at woody as shrink in love with the sheep. And the hotel room scene was classic!! Leaving aside all of woody’s personal life issues. he sure can do some very very funny films!


17 posted on 06/07/2014 2:26:46 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan


Things are different in New Zeland. For instance this is what Prince William has to do when he arrives.
18 posted on 06/07/2014 2:58:18 PM PDT by wonkowasright (Wonko from outside the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Or pedophilia?

But hey....its Auckland, NZ. Have a friend from NZ. He claims its by far and away the most isolated, boring, place in the entire world!

They’ll do anything for entertainment! So, a conference on “how many lesbians does it take to change a cross-threaded light bulb”; followed by, “My Sheep and me and I”.


19 posted on 06/07/2014 3:04:08 PM PDT by Rich21IE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

“ethical, healthy polyamory relationships”

‘HEALTHY’queer relationships? Try selling that to the epidemiologists at CDC.


20 posted on 06/07/2014 3:27:40 PM PDT by GladesGuru (Islam Delenda Est - because of what Islam is and because of what Muslims do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru

Indeed. It’s a total oxymoron. Like “monogamous polygamy”.


21 posted on 06/07/2014 3:39:11 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan
"Queer polyamory"?

In other words, typical homo promiscuity + a bit of self righteousness about it.

22 posted on 06/07/2014 3:44:18 PM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

If they can’t be faithful to a partner, what is the point of bothering with “marriage”?


23 posted on 06/07/2014 4:59:13 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

It’s just a step on the way to destroying marriage altogether,


24 posted on 06/07/2014 5:19:21 PM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson