Skip to comments.NYT Goes After Bergdahl's 'Raggedy' Unit Again, This Time in a Sunday Page A1 Report
Posted on 06/09/2014 7:01:34 AM PDT by chessplayer
click here to read article
These “reporters” will receive a medal from Obama and a special audience with him during which they will be allowed to worship their god in person.
One of their condemnations of the unit was that they wore bandanas in the defensive trenches.
Whoa. Those dudes were out of control.
^ [[SARCASM ALERT]] ^
Once again, the NYT goes for party over country.
Help me out here: Is Bergdahl the only US Serviceman to be captured during the entirety of our involvement in Afghanistan? Doesn’t that suggest that there is something odd at work here?
The NYT: acting as a stenographer for the White House at least since 2008.
Spitting in the wind. As evidenced by the total misreading of the situation by Obama & his thug advisors, there are still a LOT of folks in this country who love and value the guys in the military. Trying to “blame” them in any way is also going to backfire. After seeing men from the deserter’s platoon on TV and hearing their side of the story, these slugs in the media can spin all they want .... what they are saying/doing is a great way to lose “friends” and make enemies .... they’re reaffirming their role as the enemedia.
As for Obama, he has also affirmed what he is with this total slip of the ‘mask’ .... at best he’s a Muslim/AQ sympathizer and doesn’t give a d@mn about our military (VA mess, turning AQ lose to kill our troops)and he’s violated his oath of office many times .... at worst, he’s a traitor to the country. Frankly, I’m not seeing much difference between the two these days.
I just love the upper west side types holding their nose in the air and looking down their nose at those who served.
Kinda reminds one about how the NYT treats women. Just ask Jill Abramson.
They are more destructive to the West than Al-Qaeda is.
This message is being crafted by the “dudes” in the WH, and spoon-fed to their “friends” in the media.
Having seen and heard these soldiers who speak out; they demonstrated they are not ignorant; I suspect they expected this kind of treatment from the communists.
Bergdahl was the ONLY deserter in the Afghanistan war. The ONLY one you New York Times editors. None of the other people in his ‘raggedy unit’ deserted. None of the other people in any of the other ‘units’ deserted either... Just Bergdahl.
I’m going out on a limb here - it was Bergdahl’s who was wrong... It had nothing to do with his unit - or others would have deserted. Bergdahl was weak and stupid at best - at worst a traitor. What’s YOUR excuses - you editors at the New York Times? Why do you attempt to provide a lame cover for a deserter? Who’s side are you on?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.