Gee, NYT, what is your source for this information?
One thing for sure— the fitreps for the members of the unit are available through the former members, and they reflect the assessments of the military chain of command on their individual and group performance. The members through the internet and Army Times, have spilled the beans on this BS about bergdahl, and the muzzie in chief.
The Pentagon’s report on bergdahl was that he was a deserter, and hence they did not list him as a POW, because... he wasn’t.
This article is like a college rumor sheet approach.... a sort of “people have said” type sourcing. That is, no sourcing of any validity. The horses are already out of the barn. And THIS rates page A1 coverage trashing the unit as
raggedy? The times would rather support whatever elitist heroin addict distributors in the demo party who supply the liberal elite with their chemical dependency and keep them happy and hooked—since the country source gang/govt. in afghan is changing over to a different tribe than Karzai. One can never discount the effect of the number one export product of afghan in all this. Always consider whom the times are speaking to— moral reprobate drug financed lefties and their mob pals in labor and much else (vegas). The French Connection all over again.
Probably the same source that is claiming the traitor was tortured, beaten, and and kept in solitary confinement for 5 years. The making of a victim to support obammy's agenda.