More barf from Harf.
How much effect could five men have on the battle field?
Imagine the ancient world without Alexander, Napoleon, Caesar, Hannibal, Attila.
Imagine more recent history without John Paul Jones, Lafayette, Joan of Arc, Robert E. Lee, or Rommel.
Imagine history without Churchill, Lenin, Lincoln, Washington, or Gandhi.
Imagine a world without Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Caligula, or Obama.
Sadly, we are releasing five of our enemy’s senior leaders, and these men will have added credibility as survivors of Gitmo, not to mention as those on the winning side of a trade for one treasonous deserter. What difference will they make? I suspect we will find out, and when we do, Obama will announce that he heard it on TV and is very angry at the republicans who allowed the next big terrorist attack to succeed (probably because we didn’t stop global warming, and the Taliban are just lashing out because climate change is disrupting their lives).
Substantial asymmetric warriors. Jihad continues apace.
From, “The Quranic Concept of War”…
The universalism of Islam, in its all-embracing creed, is imposed on the be- lievers as a continuous process of warfare, psychological and political, if not strictly military. . . . The Jihad, accordingly, may be stated as a doctrine of a permanent state of war, not continuous fighting.”— Majid Khadduri
John F’n Idiot and his mouthpiece.
This statement from bammy’s administration makes no sense and is illogical on its face. If five significant players will have no impact, why do we bother with drone strikes, often for just one guy, knowing they may cause civilian casualties? And if these five aren’t significant players, why did we hold them for years? This is BS,pure unadulterated BS.
Seems like the left have no shortage of finding dopes that make Jay Carney look like Einstein.