Skip to comments.Advocates Plan Common Core Counteroffensive
Posted on 06/10/2014 10:56:07 AM PDT by PoloSec
Proponents of Common Core are launching an ambitious new plan to defend the multi-state education standards, educational leaders announced Tuesday morning.
Higher education leaders are forming a new group, Higher Ed for Higher Standards, that seeks to promote college and career ready standards, in particular Common Core.
The new group was announced by Nancy Zimpher, chancellor of the State University of New York (SUNY), and John Morgan, chancellor of the Tennessee Board of Regents, which manages all the public universities in the state except for the University of Tennessee system.
The group already has backing from over 200 higher education figures in 31 states, from University of South Dakota president James Abbott to California State University, Chico president Paul Zingg.
Also affiliated are multi-college organizations such as the Association of American Universities, which represents 62 of the nations top research universities, including MIT and seven of the eight Ivy League schools. With the groups public announcement, Higher Ed for Higher Standards hopes to draw in more leaders from additional states.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
I saw some of the Common (communist) core math assignments, and it is NOT MATH at all! It is NONSENSE
It does the OPPOSITE of making kids ready for college
Did anyone really expect this to go unchallenged? It’s just like Global Warming - even though the evidence shows there’s been a pause in the warming for 17 yrs. and the human component incredibly tiny, leftists double down on stupid for the sake of their ideology and the real goal of power and control. Same is happening with Common Core. If you saw the video of the little 3rd grade girl (a real cutie by the way) doing the CC math problem, that should prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that CC is not about raising standards or helping children.
Freudian slip in the article: Its now about how to teach, its about what students need to know,
I believe they meant to say it’s NOT about how to teach but instead they said “Now.”
New Audit report out in Texas.
C-SCOPE is the appetizer to COMMON CORE.
CSCOPE Audit Done Grassroots Vindicated
by Donna Garner
Texas State Auditor John Keel just released his audit entitled The CSCOPE Contract at Education Service Centers June 1014 Report No. 14-034: http://www.sao.state.tx.us/reports/main/14-034.pdf
For the many people who have been working so hard to uncover and discredit CSCOPE, this report vindicates their concerns. Of course, this report is focused only on the fiscal issues behind CSCOPE, the Texas Education Service Center Curriculum Collaborative (TESCCC), the Texas Education Service Centers, and the TEKS Resource System.
This report from the State Auditors Office (SAO) does not deal with the questionable content of the CSCOPE lessons nor with the quality or validity of the curriculum management system itself.
The public will need to read the SAO report for themselves to get the full brunt, but I am going to attempt to put into my own words some of the most egregious findings in the report:
First, we need to remember that the ESCs have no money of their own. They use our taxpayers dollars by which to operate, and history tells us that it is always easier to spend someone elses dollars than to fork over our own. This maxim is demonstrated in the lax oversight of taxpayers dollars spent on CSCOPE.
Mt. Pleasant is the home of the Ratliff Clan: Bill Ratliff is a powerful ex-Texas Senator. Lt. Gov. and lobbyist. His son Thomas Ratliff has been a Microsoft lobbyist for eons yet is on the Texas State Board of Education illegally. Bennett Ratliff was in the Texas House but was dumped in this springs primaries.
It is no coincidence that the first CSCOPE contract (2005) was struck between Mt. Pleasant ESC Region 8 and National Education Resources (NER). The SAO report says that this contract lacked fundamental provisions to help protect the States and taxpayers interests
We also need to remember that CSCOPE is digitized, and guess which company would benefit considerably from all digitized materials Microsoft. Thomas Ratliff just happens to have been a lobbyist for Microsoft for at least the last 12 years and has undoubtedly benefitted financially from the millions of dollars worth of CSCOPE sales.
Region 8 right there in the Ratliffs backyard did not publish a request for proposals; obtain bid proposals from vendors for the development of the curriculum management system; perform a needs assessment to identify the key elements needed from the vendor; or obtain a legal review of the contracts.
Get this: The Region 8 contract with NER was written on one page, did not specify a price, include a description of how fees for services would be calculated, include specification of deliverables, or provide details on ownership of intellectual property.
However, as loose as the one-pager between NER and the Mt. Pleasant ESC 8 was, the contract did specify that the NER would throw back a 12% rebate to the Mt. Pleasant ESC 8 (and the TESCCC later on) based upon subscription fees paid for CSCOPE.
The TESCCC was paid $1.16 Million in rebates, but the SAO strangely could not determine exactly how much in total had been paid to the Mt. Pleasant ESC 8 because they had destroyed the documentation.
From 2005 2011, the ESCs s paid National Education Resources, Inc. some $8.7 Million. This contract did not follow all of the requirements in Texas Education Code (TEC), Sect. 44.031. The ESCs used parts of the TEC to set up the CSCOPE contracts but ignored the part where they were supposed to prove that their product was the best value for the district.
Twenty Education Service Centers (ESCs) provided access to CSCOPE to 70% of Texas school districts. The 20 ESCs collected a total of $73.9 Million in revenue from the sale of CSCOPE services to school districts, charter schools, private schools from Sept. 2005 through Aug. 2013; but the ESCs reported a total of $67.8 Million in CSCOPE-related expenditures.
The discrepancy between these two figures exists because the ESCs did not all code their CSCOPE services in the same way. Neither did they charge the same amount across the board for these CSCOPE services.
The SAO could not cover in-depth all 20 of the ESCs; therefore, it chose to do a sampling audit by analyzing data from 9 of the 20 ESCs. Please see pages 17 19 to see the wide fee variations among the ESCs for various services.
Because of the helter-skelter way of accounting for CSCOPE expenditures among the 20 ESCs, the SAO could not reach a well-documented conclusion to determine the amount of CSCOPE revenues and expenditures.
However, the SAO did uncover some very troubling CSCOPE activities. For instance, in one school year alone (even though CSCOPE was designed only for students in K-12), the Marshall ISD (Region - Kilgore) included 296 of its early childhood education and pre-kindergarten students in its subscriptions for CSCOPE, ending up being overpaid thousands of dollars by the state. (p. 19)
Interestingly, ESC Region 13 Austin did not disagree with a single recommendation made by the SAOs report. Region 13 management knew they had been caught red-handed by the State Auditors Office.
A Summary of the Deficiencies Identified is found on pp. vi viii.
The SAOs Legislative Recommendations are found on p. vii.
Of course, most of us would like to see heads roll and ESC/CSCOPE/TESCCC/TEKS Resource System employees put in jail for their sloppy handling of millions of our taxpayers dollars. That probably will not happen, but I can tell you that if the Texas Legislature passes laws that follow the SAOs recommendations (and I am reasonably sure they will), there will be many ESC/CSCOPE/TESCCC/TEKS Resource System employees who will be unhappy.
Under the SAOs recommendations, the TEA, Governor, Legislative Budget Board, and State Board of Education will have to give their approval before the ESCs can initiate, design, or construct anything like CSCOPE ever again. They will be forced to document that their products are in compliance with Texas required learning standards (TEKS). They will have to pass through stringent and accepted auditing processes for what they spend and take in.
The main thing gained from this SAO report is that the ESC/CSCOPE/TESCCC/TEKS Resource System employees cannot keep practicing the arbitrary and arrogant use of our taxpayers dollars.
Grassroots citizens have been vindicated, and the Truth shall set us free.