Posted on 06/11/2014 10:55:51 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
Sniff! With the stunning Eric Cantor congressional primary loss yesterday, the Republicans are now less willing to "compromise" on such programs as immigration "reform" and other Democrat inspired legislation according to Dana Bash of CNN who thinks that's sad. So sad.
Bash dropped even the slight pretense of non-bias this morning during a CNN New Day report on Cantor's historic loss. She declared it "sad" that the election result now makes it unlikely for Republicans to act like Democrats. Break out the violins and play an appropriately mournful tune as Bash indulges her sadness:
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
We’ll compromise, we won’t sell out to the left-wing position. BIG difference.
Waah waah waah.
To hell with compromise.
It’s sad, so sad
It’s a sad, sad situation
And it’s getting more and more absurd
It’s sad, so sad
Why can’t we talk it over
Oh it seems to me
That sorry seems to be the hardest word
Lefties are always wringing their handkerchiefs because they lack critical thinking skills or the ethos that guides the rest of us.
They figure if they bus-in a bunch of young illegals (AKA future democRats) we’ll say `Ah, never mind’, because, you know, it’s for the children.
Mean what? That the Democrats will now have to?
-PJ
Compromise has resulted in the HELL that “both” political parties have put us in.
I haven’t seen the democrats compromise yet!
Compromise has been defined as a partial surrender. The right has been surrendering ground so much that they are now to the left of center.
Compromise has been defined as a partial surrender. The right has been surrendering ground so much that they are now to the left of center. And don’t even know it.
The media narrative follows the Democrat narrative. That the Republicans must do all the compromising. This is brainwashing pure and simple which is fairly easy with our publik skrool edumacation system turning out more dumbed down youths each year who know nothing about American civics and American history. Whose textbooks had five pages on Harriet Tubman and one paragraph on (evil slave holder) George Washington
Did Liberals compromise when they forced “O” into the nomination of his party and the HE in turn consistently fails (REFUSES) to compromise on basic and required procedures in the execution of his duties?
Imagine if things were to turn around enough that Democrats would have to compromise. They would choke on the progress.
I think they probably compromise every day. Obama’s true intention is to model the US after North Korea. The fact that he is temporarily accepting less than full blown totalitarian communism is a “compromise”.
She's wrong. It's the American people that aren't willing to compromise and they said so. Loudly.
A big thanks. Compromise is for losers and the Republicans and Americans have been losing for a long time.
Why is it a one way street with the GOP and it;s sycophants?
enough compromise with them as well.
Yes it is from an Islamist word that means submit. :)
Compromise to a dem/lib is agreeing with what THEY want.
Spot on, that’s exactly how they’ve done it for centuries.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.