At only 53%, aren’t they discriminating against whites? Why do they say they’re “too heavily white”?? [/ liberal idiot mode]
No, what these libtard peons really mean is “more non-white people so my liberal white guilt will be appeased even though I prefer whites to be the bosses”..
I caught that statistic too and questioned why 53% white was ‘too high’. It seems to me that the Asian % was too high.
Of course, everyone really understands what is going on here. Linked-In is heavy on people with technical skills, medical, etc. Asians and whites do dominate in these fields. The fact that these groups actually study these subjects at University level does not occur to these people??????