Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: artichokegrower

At only 53%, aren’t they discriminating against whites? Why do they say they’re “too heavily white”?? [/ liberal idiot mode]


3 posted on 06/12/2014 7:57:49 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Still Thinking

No, what these libtard peons really mean is “more non-white people so my liberal white guilt will be appeased even though I prefer whites to be the bosses”..


4 posted on 06/12/2014 7:59:53 PM PDT by max americana (fired liberals in our company last election, and I laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

I caught that statistic too and questioned why 53% white was ‘too high’. It seems to me that the Asian % was too high.

Of course, everyone really understands what is going on here. Linked-In is heavy on people with technical skills, medical, etc. Asians and whites do dominate in these fields. The fact that these groups actually study these subjects at University level does not occur to these people??????


5 posted on 06/12/2014 8:02:49 PM PDT by Gumdrop (~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson