Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

World's largest water reservoir found deep in earth
Indo Asian News Service ^ | 13 June 2014 | Anon

Posted on 06/13/2014 3:41:21 AM PDT by rjbemsha

In what could quench the thirst of billions of people in the future, researchers have discovered our planet's largest water reservoir 640 km beneath our feet - bound up in rock deep in the earth's mantle.

This water is not in a form familiar to us - it is not liquid, ice or vapour.

This fourth form is water trapped inside the molecular structure of the minerals in the mantle rock.

Scientists have been looking for this missing deep water for decades," explained geophysicist Steve Jacobsen from Northwestern University.

(Excerpt) Read more at sg.news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: alreadyposted; northwestern; notfromtheflood; ntsa; ringwoodite; stevejacobsen; water
If just one percent of the weight of mantle rock located in the transition zone is H2O, that would be equivalent to nearly three times the amount of water in our oceans.
1 posted on 06/13/2014 3:41:22 AM PDT by rjbemsha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rjbemsha

But isn’t Peak Water a real problem? Isn’t the planet running out of water?

It’s a manmade problem!
It’s Bush’s fault!


2 posted on 06/13/2014 3:44:36 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjbemsha

I am waiting for the Sierra Club to chime in that we can’t go after it, after all the technology to get it is right at our fingertips. Fracking Equipment. Oh the Horror :-)...


3 posted on 06/13/2014 3:44:36 AM PDT by taildragger (The E-GOP won't know what hit them, The Party of Reagan is almost here, hang tight folks....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

Yeah .. right ... frack it ... I’m sure that’s the next argument


4 posted on 06/13/2014 3:46:02 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rjbemsha

Sorry, it’s heritage water and belongs to Gaia. Using it would be an insult to the planet.


5 posted on 06/13/2014 3:51:48 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjbemsha

I’ve read that there may be as much as 10 times more water in the earth than on it. In fact the story I read seemed to suggest that our sea levels are as high as they can be because more water in the oceans would mean more water forced into the earth.


6 posted on 06/13/2014 3:57:54 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

Do you think your going to frack 640 kilometers below the surface worth today’s technology?


7 posted on 06/13/2014 3:58:28 AM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rjbemsha

“. . . the fountains of the great deep burst open . . . “


8 posted on 06/13/2014 4:00:39 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

Besides, it can’t be easy tossing back a glass of rocks.


9 posted on 06/13/2014 4:03:09 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

“But isn’t Peak Water a real problem? Isn’t the planet running out of water?”
___________________________________________________________
What, me worry?...I have 187 quintillion gallons of water just a hundred feet from my door. Of course, I have to remove the salt before drinking it, but I know that can be done.
When I run out of that, I will just move on over to the Atlantic. :))


10 posted on 06/13/2014 4:04:23 AM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

Certainly not to a group more used to smoking rocks


11 posted on 06/13/2014 4:07:52 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

First thing I thought of as well.


12 posted on 06/13/2014 4:11:18 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

There must be a way to tie this to Climate Disruption!


13 posted on 06/13/2014 4:18:35 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rjbemsha

Bad to pump oil reservoirs because then it will all be used up.

But okay to pump fresh water reservoirs.


14 posted on 06/13/2014 4:55:48 AM PDT by Iron Munro (The Obamas' Black skin has morphed into Teflon thanks to the Obama Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
“. . . the fountains of the great deep burst open . . . “

thinking the same thing!

15 posted on 06/13/2014 4:57:24 AM PDT by ealgeone (obama, borderof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rjbemsha

But if we have global warming and Miami is going to be underwater, why would we want more water? Why not pump it down to the mantle? Then we wouldn’t have to build those sea walls around Manhattan. Or something or other. Oh, and don’t forget Al Gore’s mansion in Pacific Palisades. Or something or other.

It’s difficult to keep up with all the Friedman think in his “Flat Earth”.


16 posted on 06/13/2014 5:22:11 AM PDT by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjbemsha

A nice scientific discovery, but utterly inapplicable to today’s water issues. Anything 640km down is far into the mantle i.e. well into the zone of molten or near-molten rock. That depth is actually the approximate boundary of the lower mantle.


17 posted on 06/13/2014 5:46:22 AM PDT by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjbemsha

And there is a battery that will propel a car 800 miles.

Except it can’t be recharged.


18 posted on 06/13/2014 5:51:17 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjbemsha

The article is totally misleading. There is no way to get at this water, and it has never been directly sampled.
In fact, it is not even water, but just OH, which is part of water and could be made to recombine to produce hydrogen and water — however, all this is far beneath the surface of the Earth, in the middle part
of the mantle, hundreds of km down. By comparison, humans have never even drilled through the mantle of the earth, which is as thin as 5 km in ocean basins.
It is as even more impossible and impractical to get at this water directly as it would be to ship minerals here from the moon, which is another nutty idea one occasional sees featured in journalism of the grocery-store check-out-line level.
The mineral ringwoodite (mentioned in the article) is stable at pressures around 20 GPa. By comparison, the atmospheric pressure at the Earth’s surface is 100 kPa. So ringhwoodite exists at pressures about 20 million times that of the surface (if I have my zeros right).

But perhaps it would be fun to start a movement against fracking for ringwoodite-water, just to divert those who fear fracking in the crust of the Earth, or those afraid of genetically modified organisms.


19 posted on 06/13/2014 5:53:48 AM PDT by docbnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjbemsha

My Geology I teacher mentioned this back in 1975.


20 posted on 06/13/2014 5:59:33 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

The Hydroplate theory. I have studied it. All the geologic evidence supports the theory and it drives the morons who are gradualists, “billions and billions of years” nuts, they fumble for their medications and empty the liquor cabinet.

This “evolutionary theory” isn’t science and the evolutionists know it but they cannot abide with a living God.

So be it. Let them learn the truth in front of God. God already said this would happen.

We just live our lives on a videotape that God already saw before the heavens and earth and all of us were created.


21 posted on 06/13/2014 6:01:41 AM PDT by the anti-mahdi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

And I actually surmise that there are miles of solid gold serving as the base structure for this molecular water. I need some grant money to figger this out fersure. Good Grief!


22 posted on 06/13/2014 6:09:35 AM PDT by SgtHooper (This is not my tag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rjbemsha

planet running out of water...... PLANET RUNNING OUT OF LOGIC AND COMMON SENSE AND SCIENTIFIC FACT....


23 posted on 06/13/2014 6:16:11 AM PDT by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: docbnj
would be to ship minerals here from the moon, which is another nutty idea one occasional sees featured in journalism of the grocery-store check-out-line level.

An idea also vociferously espoused by the FR space kadet contingent along with colonizing Mars and colonizing the moon and other unfeasible stuff.

24 posted on 06/13/2014 7:44:47 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rjbemsha

One wonders at the the true depths of human stupidity, when on a planet covered 2/3 with water, millions are convinced that there is a danger we might run out.


25 posted on 06/13/2014 7:55:53 AM PDT by ladyrustic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: docbnj; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Thanks docbnj!


26 posted on 06/13/2014 4:58:36 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga; docbnj

> It is as even more impossible and impractical to get at this water directly as it would be to ship minerals here from the moon, which is another nutty idea one occasional sees featured in journalism of the grocery-store check-out-line level.

There are ways to bring material mined from asteroids — gold, silver, the platinum metals, rare Earths — down, and it will be done, and economically, within a few generations. But mining the Moon for Helium-3 (that’s the only thing I recall seeing on FR, btw) doesn’t make sense because there’s no He3 fusion reactors, and it doesn’t seem very likely that there ever will be.


27 posted on 06/13/2014 5:03:24 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

But but but!...

IF we were able to get all that He3, we’d have to do *something* with it!


28 posted on 06/14/2014 12:20:53 AM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Grimmy

Until controlled fusion is demonstrated (and I’m fairly sure it won’t be), there’s no reason to bring back He3. Depending on the actual yield, it will probably remain uneconomical to fetch it from the Moon using chemical propulsion, and in fact, as we move into methane/reformer fuel cell technology for electrical power generation and get the methane from the hydrates and clathrates on the sea floor, fusion research is likely to become more and more a tough sell.


29 posted on 06/14/2014 4:59:24 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
But mining the Moon for Helium-3 (that’s the only thing I recall seeing on FR, btw) doesn’t make sense because there’s no He3 fusion reactors, and it doesn’t seem very likely that there ever will be.


30 posted on 06/14/2014 4:30:04 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

What I’ve noticed is that those who claim the Earth is gaining or losing water (seas rising or falling) cannot explain where this water would come from or go to.

Between the minor amount of water evaporated into space and the ice crystals which we attract as we spin through our solar system, I don’t think the amount of water on Earth has changed significantly in a long, long time.


31 posted on 06/14/2014 4:42:37 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson