Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Low-Cost Fusion Project Steps Out of the Shadows and Looks for Money
NBC News ^ | June 13, 2014 | Alan Boyle

Posted on 06/14/2014 3:40:55 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

A hush-hush nuclear fusion project that's received $12 million from the U.S. Navy is now sharing what it calls encouraging results — and looking for private investment.

For years, EMC2 Fusion Development Corp. has had to conduct its research into what's known as Polywell fusion outside public view because the Navy wanted it that way. Now the Navy is phasing out its funding, and EMC2 Fusion is planning a three-year, $30 million commercial research program to see if its unorthodox approach can provide a fast track to cheap nuclear fusion power.

"The goal is, we want to get a set of concrete data that will allow us to make a decision if, when and how we can build a fusion device," EMC2 Fusion's president and chief scientist, Jaeyoung Park, told NBC News. "Obviously 'if' is a big part of it, but we believe the 'if' part looks promising. ... We might have a very pleasant surprise. Fusion might not be 30 years from now, but maybe 10 years, or maybe around the corner."

Not everyone is convinced the Polywell approach will work. EMC2 Fusion's latest findings, which were made public via the ArXiv academic preprint server, are more positive than skeptics suspected but not as positive as some supporters hoped.

"This finding ... is just one step along the way," said M. Simon, a frequent contributor to the Talk-Polywell online discussion forum. "It makes the case that further experiments are warranted. In other words, no showstoppers."(continued)

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: energy; fusion; physics; polywellfusion; science

1 posted on 06/14/2014 3:40:56 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
In other words, the Navy finally said “enough, no results, no more money,” so they're looking for private dupes.
2 posted on 06/14/2014 4:08:24 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why doesn’t the Navy just buy Rossi’s E-cat?


3 posted on 06/14/2014 4:48:37 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Rossi’s people need to make some ‘connections’ with the 0bama people.

They could use Rossi’s Catalyzer to charge some new,new ultra hi tech batteries!

Using all the surplus energy to reverse the windmills and back up global warming!


4 posted on 06/14/2014 6:02:12 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Because Rossi has already sold the rights to E-cat.


5 posted on 06/14/2014 6:08:23 AM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Courtesy ping...


6 posted on 06/14/2014 7:00:51 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias... "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

7 posted on 06/14/2014 8:41:22 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Hmmm.... Thanks!

Deceased, voluntarily departed -- or banished?

8 posted on 06/14/2014 8:45:49 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias... "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
Rode the lightening.

From the big man himself.

9 posted on 06/14/2014 8:49:12 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

obama doesn’t want regular citizens to have cheap and under their control, energy. energy equals independence and freedom.


10 posted on 06/14/2014 1:31:47 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; backwoods-engineer; ...
Thanks 2ndDivisionVet.


· List topics · post a topic · subscribe · Google ·

11 posted on 06/22/2014 7:14:06 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

this story doesn’t make sense.

If they are as good as they say—why would the navy cut them off and make them go public.


12 posted on 06/22/2014 7:23:39 PM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Exactly. You don’t cut funding on a promising project. You cut funding on a project you don’t have any faith in.

The Navy is basically saying: you can have this piece of crap. We don’t want it.


13 posted on 06/23/2014 3:54:48 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson