Skip to comments.Obama says climate change deniers ignoring science
Posted on 06/14/2014 12:24:15 PM PDT by artichokegrower
ANAHEIM, Calif. (AP) President Barack Obama said denying climate change is like arguing the moon is made of cheese, as he issued a call to action on global warming to Saturday's graduates of the University of California, Irvine.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
Was he wearing his jester outfit?
Good to see Nedra Pickler is still plugging away for St. Barack. I was afraid she might have lost the faith.
"This was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow,and our planet began to heal.
Welcome King Barack "Canute" Obama the Great.....
...Obama issues an Executive Order to the Sun...
....to increase it's magnetic field....
and make a good crop of sunspots before elections in 2016....
(PhysOrg.com) -- Sunspot formation is triggered by a magnetic field, which scientists say is steadily declining. They predict that by 2016 there may be no remaining sunspots, and the sun may stay spotless for several decades.
The last time the sunspots disappeared altogether was in the 17th and 18th century, and coincided with a lengthy cool period on the planet known as the Little Ice Age....and lasted 400 years.
Good luck surviving with lesso electricity and GE modified seeds.
Read more at: http://phys.org/news203746768.html#jCp also
Consensus is not part of the Scientific Method.
Bold statement for one who has no science.
Says the the “constitutional law scholar.”
Obama is an idiot, but he’s sitting in the pilot’s seat thanks to idiots, and Democrat Party fraud.
The “warmists” are such complete anti-science idiots. Their ideology always trumps reality. Buffoons!
Is there really anyone in the United States who actually believes a single word that comes out of this guy’s mouth?
The “science” gets fishier as time goes on.
For all we could know, the earth had been thinking about going chilly again, and then all this anthropogenic CO2 came along and stopped it in the nick of time. If it’s even THAT powerful. Perhaps, most of the carbon that has ever visited the earth’s atmosphere is now at the bottom of the sea in the form of accretions of carbonate based sea shells.
Whereas, the left likes to just make it up.
According to Brian Sussman, the earth has cooled .36°F in the last seventeen years.
There has been no global warming in 17 years and ten months.
No smoking hot spot
1. The greenhouse signature is missing. We have been looking and measuring for years, and cannot find it.
Each possible cause of global warming has a different pattern of where in the planet the warming occurs first and the most. The signature of an increased greenhouse effect is a hot spot about 10km up in the atmosphere over the tropics. We have been measuring the atmosphere for decades using radiosondes: weather balloons with thermometers that radio back the temperature as the balloon ascends through the atmosphere. They show no hot spot. Whatsoever.
If there is no hot spot then an increased greenhouse effect is not the cause of global warming. So we know for sure that carbon emissions are not a significant cause of the global warming. If we had found the greenhouse signature then I would be an alarmist again.
31, 487 American sci-en-tists have signed this document denying global warming or climate change as a human driven event. Over 9,000 have a PhD in the sciences. They disagree with you, Mr. President.
Guess who the ignorant jackass is.
They’re skeptical of a rage in the scientific community which has put together a set of unprovable hypothetical scenarios to conjecture how the earth might see great warming followed by, not more paradises on earth, but dire disaster.
It’s one of these “existential” debates. It highlights the need to re-acknowledge God. Without that there is no basis for identifying genuine good or evil.
Any “scientist” that deliberately omits water vapor effects from calculations is a quack.
Please explain to us this Global Warming Science you speak of there , Smartest Man in the world , D’oh
Some stuff being discussed here.
The science is obvious. It’s at least 20 degrees warmer in the Northern Hemisphere than it was 6 months ago. DUH!!!!
31,000 scientists say there is no global warming. I sure they know more about this then Obummer or Al Gorp.
This”CRETIN”lives in a”Lalique House”paid for by US!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That’s because of, you know, our good intentions...and stuff.
Nothing but a set of assumptions based on cherry-picked measurements whose certitude is doubtful and which cannot be replicated.
Another was of saying ASSumptions.
Hopefully those graduates are smart enough to see that all global warming is is money to the libs. Hopefully they are smart enough to know BO lies everytime he opens his black lips
Well Barack, perhaps YOU can explain to us the substantiating “science”?
Please note, it is NOT “science” to suggest “they say”.
Yes, climate change happens. Yes, it can be devastating as witnessed during the small ice age in Europe and elsewhere. Yes, some ice will melt - yet some grows. The northern polar ice shelf has grown this very year and you can look up the satellite graphics. Areas of Antarctic are melting due to rising magna (as they recently discovered just days ago - surprise!), while other sea ice areas are growing around the Antarctic. This is undisputed fact, but do the scare-mongers bother to look at recent findings? No, they're locked into their ice core history and computer models that make them think they can predict the future.
And most importantly, the Sun's decade long of minimal sun spots can affect our planet and others in the solar system. Sheesh, I learned that in grade school and it's still true today. I doubt there is one honest astrophysicist or cosmologist that disputes the affect our Sun has on this rock.
Oh, BTW, the Earth's core is over a million degrees according to Al Gore. Har! Love to see some brave journalist ask Obambi if that's true. Can hear his response now, "Well, I'm no expert, but many others are. I'm sure they could answer that question. Yes, Candy Crowley, your question?"
We skeptics have plenty of science and scientists on our side. What we are saying is that the AGW science is wrong. Horribly wrong. Why is it wrong ? Simply put, progressive scientists put ideology over science. No one on our side is saying, because there is no AGW, government should get smaller. Everyone on the AGW side, is saying because of AGW, government should get bigger.
No we are not. The money grubbing scientist have us over a barrel with a snow job to extract more tax money into their phony grant projects. They are the liars and will say anything for that easy money.
Zer0, the Liar in Chief, lies to hide the fact that he is working to destroy America. Why would he not lie about climate change?
Nedra Pickler, AP.
Stenographer for every Democrat White House since 1998.
A volcano under the Antarctic ice shelf was recently found to have been hotter than previously believed.That,combined with evidence that *Arctic* ice is on the increase kinda shoots down the “melting ice is man made” argument.
> said denying climate change is like arguing the moon is made of cheese...
That’s an obvious logical fallacy, I’m sure U of C grads were completely unable to recognize that fact and call his sorry ass on it.
I think it’s a “Phenomenon”called”Summer”???
OK!! Everybody pay attention!
Lesson for today:
1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.
2. The sun is a ball of fire that controls the climates of all its planets.
3. The earth is one of the suns planets.
4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.
5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.
Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?
Friis-Christianson and Lassen theory enables us to predict temperature for a solar cycle if we know the length of the solar cycle preceding it. Thus Solheim et al have been able to predict that the average global temperature over Solar Cycle 24 will be 0.9°C lower than it was over Solar Cycle 23. Polar amplification also plays a part such that Svalbard, for example, in winter will experience a 6°C decline in temperature. Work on temperature records in the northeast United States suggest that the temperature decline in prospect for the Corn Belt is 2.0°C for Solar Cycle 24.
We can cross-check this expectation against modelled historic Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) data. Lean et al produced a reconstruction of TSI back to 1610. That is shown in Figure 4 following. Also shown is Livingstone and Penns prediction for Solar Cycle 25 amplitude converted to TSI by scaling against the Maunder Minimum. Shaviv in 2008 found empirically that a 1 watt/m2 change in TSI was associated with (as opposed to cause directly) in a 0.6°C change in global average temperature.
A fall in solar activity to levels reached in the Dalton Minimum, as per Leans data, would result in a decline of global temperature of 1.2°C, a little more than what Solheims group is projecting.
More at: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/09/08/the-climate-grain-production-relationship-quantified/
Barack Obama faked his way through school with people pulling strings to get him in everywhere he went, according to what can be ascertained. He surely does not strike anyone as any sort of student of science - or geography - or math - or political science or English language usage or vocabulary. Not even constitutional law. Nothing his teaching days at that came an abrupt halt soon after he got a job as an adjunct teaching that. And the fake-o in chief is lecturing on science. I wager that any 5th grader knows more science than B.O. What a joke.
Wasn't it a consensus several hundred years that stated that the sun and stars revolved around the earth. Folks that disagreed with the consensus were tried for heresy?