Skip to comments.Hillary Clinton says U.S. needs woman in charge like Germany has Merkel
Posted on 06/16/2014 4:32:25 AM PDT by PoloSec
Hillary Clinton has told a German magazine the United States should follow Germany, where Angela Merkel is chancellor, and have a woman in charge.
She stopped short of saying, however, that it should be her.
"We are way behind you in Germany on this," the former secretary of state told stern magazine in an interview to be published in its next edition on Wednesday.
"Of course I want the U.S.A. to have a woman leader soon as well and I will do all I can for that to happen, though I don't know yet if it will be me," she said.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
Someone should ask her; what if the next president is not you Hitlery but Sarah Palin, would you go Hari Kari!
Not YOU, Hillary. *spit* Dumbest woman in the US.
Indeed . . . she as much said that she would “do all (she) can” to get Palin into the White House here, right?
Like pet rocks and Cabbage Patch kids, the American illiterati’s next fad will be a gynecocracy.
The DemonicRats in this country have already imitated Germany with their version of Hitler in the White House.
Why should we listen to Hellary and copycat Germany in what they are doing now?
The difference between Hillary and Jeane...is that Hillary's voters are merely sheep, pastured by the Dems....eating their fodder and greening their fields.
That’s incredibly sexist, Hillary.
I agree. We need an intelligent, patriotic, capable woman in the White House, standing up for liberty. ["Woman" is an irrelevant detail to anyone sensible, but the most intelligent, patriotic, and capable potential candidate happens to be exceptionally female. I will be impressed when Hillary throws her support behind Governor Palin, even if she does so for the wrong reason.]
And by the way - were you a big supporter of Thatcher?
Holy Moly! Hillary is right!
RUN SARAH RUN.
The term “ten foot pole” comes to mind when I think of Hillary.
VOTE FOR ME - I HAVE A P***Y!
Yeah, that will go over well...
No, we need a man to be President. Wait, is that a sexist statement?
What we really need, is a real man to be President, or a woman like Maggie Thatcher. I just don’t know where to find any now.
Bad enough that the liberal media is rife with inaccurate comparisons between Thatcher and Clinton.
Hillary, we know Angela Merkel. You are no Angela Merkel. First of all, we don’t know her husband at all. You chose Bill Clinton. Case closed.
Gender (like race) is NOT and should NEVER BE the qualifier for leadership!
How stupid can she get!?
Worked for our _resident, but for different reason.
Seems to have gone over rather well :)
You’re no Merkel, Mrs. Clinton.
Well, we know for sure there is this one.
Otherwise, no cigar.
And Hillary's list of failures is long and public:
Cattle futures investment
Rose Law Firm
"I can't recall" responses to Congressional inquiries
Empty Senate term
Senator from NY despite not being a New Yorker
Russian reset button
Benghazi (What difference does it make?)
Mistreatment of Secret Service members
But then again, nobody will ever go broke betting on the stupidity of the American voters