Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Katie Couric - Kerry: US open to working with Iran against extremists in Iraq
Yahoo News ^ | June 16, 2014 | Olivier Knox

Posted on 06/16/2014 6:01:47 AM PDT by maggief

Secretary of State John Kerry cautiously signalled on Monday that the United States would be open to cooperating with Iran militarily in Iraq to beat back al Qaida-inspired fighters who pose an "existential" danger to that war-torn country and may look to target Europe and the United States.

“This is a challenge to the stability of the region. It is obviously an existential challenge to Iraq itself. This is a terrorist group,” Kerry told Yahoo News Global Anchor Katie Couric in an exclusive interview.

Prodded on whether the United States would consider cooperating militarily with Iran, Kerry replied: "Let’s see what Iran might or might not be willing to do before we start making any pronouncements."

But "I think we are open to any constructive process here that could minimize the violence, hold Iraq together, the integrity of the country and eliminate the presence of outside terrorist forces that are ripping it apart," the top U.S. diplomat told Couric.

"I wouldn’t rule out anything that would be constructive to providing real stability, a respect for the (Iraqi) constitution, a respect for the election process, and a respect for the Iraqi people to form a government that represents all of the interests of Iraq -- not one sectarian group over another," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: johnkerry; kerry; secstate; traitor
BARF! Couric's intro ... decorated Vietnam vet ... swiftboated ... "intense smear campaign" ...
1 posted on 06/16/2014 6:01:47 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maggief
He's such an incompetent dufus...

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

2 posted on 06/16/2014 6:06:33 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Progressive is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Are we really going to piss off the entire Sunni sect ( Saudi Arabia, Egypt, especially) by working with the Persian Shiites?


3 posted on 06/16/2014 6:09:06 AM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

I would say that stooping that low is admitting failure.


4 posted on 06/16/2014 6:11:46 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

“Kerry: US open to working with Iran against extremists in Iraq”

“Our Islamic extremists are better than your Islamic extremists.”


5 posted on 06/16/2014 6:12:02 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Just Saying.....

6 posted on 06/16/2014 6:12:54 AM PDT by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.- Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

What about the extremists in Iran???

An observation, Obama chided Iraq for not reaching out to all sects, while they are being attacked and beheaded by an evil terror army.

Now he is welcoming in Shia Iran, another radical force, which certainly is NOT going to reach out to any Sunnis!

What a vile leftist bag of wind. We have in charge a liar, traitor and fool - Obama, Kerry and Hagel.


7 posted on 06/16/2014 6:14:18 AM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Another criminal (’why the long face’ John ‘Christmas in Cambodia’ efffin Kerry) being held up for deification by the dooooshes in the MSM.


8 posted on 06/16/2014 6:17:04 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2659004/Britain-talks-Iran-threat-ISIS-Hague-offers-technical-support-beleaguered-Iraqi-government.html

Britain in talks with Iran about threat from ISIS as Hague offers ‘technical support’ to beleaguered Iraqi government

Hague holds talks with Iranian foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif
Comes as the US considers working with Iran to tackle growing crisis
British government rules out military intervention but offers technical advice


9 posted on 06/16/2014 6:19:40 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Cantor lost because Virginians voted against the GOP-E Leadership: Boehner, Cantor, McCarthy and Ryan.

When Boehner is no longer Speaker the road is then cleared to force Obama to resign, as it is to late for a lengthy Impeachment of Obama.

The longer that We, The People tolerate Boehner as speaker of the House, the longer We, the People are guilty of tolerating Obama as our Taliban Mullah in Chief.


10 posted on 06/16/2014 6:20:06 AM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

11 posted on 06/16/2014 6:21:16 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maggief
"What now Vlad? ...Don't take me to Iraq! ..I dun wanna go!"


12 posted on 06/16/2014 6:23:00 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
Cantor lost because he supported amnesty. He lied and said he was not in favor of amnesty. The GOP leadership is in favor of amnesty. Cantor wrote the Rep principles on amnesty that emerged from the Rep retreat.

As someone who actually worked with the campaign, I find it fascinating that so many people are trying to find other reasons why Cantor lost. He lost because he wants to bring in huge numbers of foreign workers at a time when 21 million Americans are unemployed or underemployed. Dave Brat was the first recent GOP politician to defend the American worker and question the wisdom of bringing in so many foreign workers, legal and illegal. Brat attacked the Chamber of Commerce and the corporate class.

Dave Brat Press Conference on Immigration

13 posted on 06/16/2014 6:31:14 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

All Part of her plan....

14 posted on 06/16/2014 6:35:06 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maggief

When it’s Christmas time in Cambodia this year little Johnny won’t be there.

He’ll be in Iran making deals with another group of people who are trying to kill us.


15 posted on 06/16/2014 6:36:09 AM PDT by Iron Munro (The Obamas' Black skin has morphed into Teflon thanks to the Obama Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Hey k k k k Katie ... the SwiftBoat Veterans For Truth did not 'smear' J F'ng K ... they merely corrected the lies his potus campaign concocted about his military career (did you know I served in Vietnam?) ... with the real truth.

www.tosettherecordstraight.com

like Jengis (sic) Kahn ... video "SELLOUT" at the link ...

16 posted on 06/16/2014 6:38:25 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Obama's Islamic Brain


17 posted on 06/16/2014 6:38:51 AM PDT by Iron Munro (The Obamas' Black skin has morphed into Teflon thanks to the Obama Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: maggief

The foreign policy failures of Emperor Zero and Hillary the Great have been so devastating, so tragic, so dangerous and so life threatening, that they are now forced to ask the Mullahs of Iran for help.


18 posted on 06/16/2014 6:41:37 AM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Not so.

The exit polls showed that Immigration was NOT the main factor in those voting against Cantor.


19 posted on 06/16/2014 6:42:11 AM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Is this the same John Kerry that served in Vietnam?


20 posted on 06/16/2014 6:43:25 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
I don't know what exit polls you are referring to, but I can tell you that immigration/amnesty was the issue that resonated the most with voters, especially those in Hanover County.

The GOP Establishment doesn't want amnesty be the issue. I would like to see the source of your assertion and see exactly how the question was worded. Brat drew the link between American jobs and immigration, legal and illegal. It was all about jobs and what Cantor and his corporate paymasters are doing to the American worker.

21 posted on 06/16/2014 7:01:42 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kabar

I’ll do my best to pull up an article to back up my assertions.


22 posted on 06/16/2014 7:05:24 AM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
how did this guy ever rise to the position.....of Secretary of ANYTHING????




23 posted on 06/16/2014 7:21:17 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
Thanks. In the meantime here is the text of a robocall I sent to 30,000 staunch Reps in the 7th District:

Greetings Patriots. Did you know that your congressman, Eric Cantor, supports amnesty rather than the Rule of Law? Don’t be fooled by his rhetoric or election time flip-flops. Any legislation that allows the lawbreakers, including children, to stay and work here is amnesty.

Cantor favors massive increases in permanent immigration and guest worker programs that will cost the jobs of Americans and depress their wages even further. He even wants to enable illegal aliens to join the US military and compete with US citizens and legal immigrants during a period of downsizing in the military. With over 20 million Americans underemployed or unemployed, this is a travesty no matter how he spins it. We don’t have a shortage of labor; we have a shortage of jobs.

Cantor does the bidding of his corporate paymasters rather than doing what is right for his constituents and our country. Cantor is no conservative. Shock the Republican Leadership on June 10th and let Cantor know there are consequences for his impending betrayal. Protect American jobs for American workers.

You know the issue of amnesty was big because the Cantor campaign flooded the district with flyers portraying Cantor as anti-amensty and the person responsible for stopping the Gang of 8 bill in the House. None of it true. And a week before the primary, Gutierrez shows up in Richmond holding a rally against Cantor for blocking immigration reform--all of this transparently coordinated to make Cantor look like an anti-amnesty stalwart. In fact, Cantor has been working with Gutierrez on Cantor's version of the Dreeam Act, aka the "Kids Act."

24 posted on 06/16/2014 7:21:24 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey

Got me? The Senators that voted for him are that dumb too.


25 posted on 06/16/2014 7:33:42 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Progressive is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Kerry is even worse now than he was after Vietnam. Ugh!


26 posted on 06/16/2014 7:36:31 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo....Sum Pro Vita - Modified Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Once a traitor always a traitor.


27 posted on 06/16/2014 7:36:51 AM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
No doubt in my mind he would have negotiated with the Viet Cong personally if allowed so he is probably salivating over this opportunity. That is until the Narcissist in Chief puts him on the back bench.
28 posted on 06/16/2014 7:40:28 AM PDT by cashless (Obama told us he would side with Muslims if the political winds shifted in an ugly direction. Ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cashless
What do you mean 'would have?' He did.

American Patriots Against John Kerry

The 1970 meeting that John Kerry conducted with North Vietnamese communists violated U.S. law, according to an author and researcher who has studied the issue.

Kerry met with representatives from “both delegations” of the Vietnamese in Paris in 1970, according to Kerry’s own testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on April 22, 1971. But Kerry’s meetings with the Vietnamese delegations were in direct violation of laws forbidding private citizens from negotiating with foreign powers, according to researcher and author Jerry Corsi, who began studying the anti-war movement in the early 1970s.

According to Corsi, Kerry violated U.S. code 18 U.S.C. 953. “A U.S. citizen cannot go abroad and negotiate with a foreign power,” Corsi told CNSNews.com.

By Kerry’s own admission, he met in 1970 with delegations from the North Vietnamese communist government and discussed how the Vietnam Warshould be stopped.


29 posted on 06/16/2014 7:41:57 AM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late; MeshugeMikey

FLASHBACK:

http://news.yahoo.com/reset-john-kerry-breezes-hill-hearing-180813815—politics.html

“You’re ready to go,” said Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee, the panel’s top-ranking Republican . “My sense is your confirmation will go through very, very quickly.”

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., called his fellow Vietnam War veteran “my friend” and told members Kerry ‘s qualifications for the job “are well known to you and all of our colleagues.”

http://www.toledoblade.com/Politics/2013/01/29/U-S-Senate-votes-to-confirm-Kerry-as-secretary-of-state.html

Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee, the panel’s top Republican , called Kerry “a realist” who will deal with unrest in Egypt, civil war in Syria, the threat of al-Qaida-linked terrorist groups in Africa and Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons.

http://www.nooga.com/159674/sen-bob-corker-complimentary-of-sen-john-kerry-in-confirmation-hearing

Corker, who became ranking member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee this week, had said earlier that he expected Kerry to “sail through” the confirmation process. The senator offered kind words to his colleague, with whom who has chaired the committee for the past for years, adding that his sense was that Kerry’s confirmation process would go through “very quickly.”

“I look at you being nominated as someone who’s almost lived your entire life, if you will, for this moment of being able to serve in this capacity,” Corker said. “I’m happy for you. I know in the many conversations we’ve had over the last two weeks that you’re very anxious to serve.”


30 posted on 06/16/2014 7:43:40 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: saganite
Are we really going to piss off the entire Sunni sect ( Saudi Arabia, Egypt, especially) by working with the Persian Shiites?

Well the upside of that would be the House of Saud quietly going to Bibi Netanyahu and saying "you can have all of our money, just PLEASE go and bomb them now!"


31 posted on 06/16/2014 7:48:13 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: maggief
"this moment of being able to serve in this capacity"

as Americas Leading Blind Watchdog???


32 posted on 06/16/2014 7:49:54 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

uber Patriots ...all....S/


33 posted on 06/16/2014 7:50:35 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Iranian/shia domination of southern Iraq and the Shatt al-arab and gulf oil exports is such a good thing, we sent aid to Iraq to prevent it in the 1980s and cheered while a million Iraqis and Iranians died fighting each other

d.oh Kerry, our latest geostrategic genius


34 posted on 06/16/2014 7:55:52 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape

the mullahs who helped make IEDs that killed our troops in Iraq


35 posted on 06/16/2014 7:56:48 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Watching the race from here in Texas it certainly appeared to me that amnesty and jobs was the big issue. And I'll further note that after Cantor lost most people concluded "comprehensive immigration reform" was dead. Then the revisionists got to work and tried to redefine the election. Most notable of the revisionists was the once popular Sen Rand Paul, who is now in a free fall with conservative grass roots.

What is one to believe revisionist experts and their phony polls? or my own lying eyes?

36 posted on 06/16/2014 7:59:41 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Corker and McCain... Two dipsticks that should be run out of the Senate.


37 posted on 06/16/2014 8:26:55 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Progressive is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

You got it. I have been in contact with the people on the ground along with Brat himself. Brat used the immigration issue the way it should be used by GOP candidates. It appeals to common sense. Why do we continue to bring in 1.1 million legal permanent immigrants and 640,000 guest workers annually when 21 million Americans are unemployed or underemployed? It makes no sense.


38 posted on 06/16/2014 9:59:58 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: kabar
It makes no sense to me either, but the US CoC republicans seem to think that we need an ever increasing number of consumers to grow our economy. They also think we need an ever increasing number of tax payers to support Social Security and Medicare. I will grant they have a valid argument but what the argument says to me is that they (GOPe) are totally committed to defending the status quo for a few more years even thou they must know that defending the status quo will eventually lead to ruin.

People such as yourself and Brat understand that hard choices must be made soon to mitigate the damage sure to come later. Rather then a more of the same plan we need a put America back to work plan coupled with a serious government reform plan. It will be painful but the more of the same plan could very well be fatal.

39 posted on 06/16/2014 10:36:16 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
It makes no sense to me either, but the US CoC republicans seem to think that we need an ever increasing number of consumers to grow our economy. <

Real wages have been declining since 1969. You can increase the population to grow the economy, but the only problem is that the slice of the pie gets smaller.

They also think we need an ever increasing number of tax payers to support Social Security and Medicare.

Pure sophistry. Both are pay as you go programs where today's workers pay for today's retirees. SS has been running in the red since 2010 and Medicare since 2008. Adding more immigrants to the system will hurt these programs, not help them. They are unsustainable as currently structured. The average Medicare recipient gets three time more than they they paid into the system.

Immigrants use our welfare system to a much greater extent than the native born. Bringing in more immigrants will increase welfare costs, which are already bankrupting us.

In 1950 there were 16 workers for every retiree; today it are 3 workers for every retiree; and by 2030 it will two to one. Immigrants grow old and retire as well.

While immigrants often arrive young and have somewhat larger families than natives do, the differences are not large enough to fundamentally alter the nation’s age structure. For example, the average age of an immigrant in 2012 was 43 years, while the average age of a native was 37. Also, in 2011 the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) in the United States without immigrants would have been 1.9 children per woman. With immigrants, it was 2.0 — an increase of one-tenth of a point. Thus, our fertility would be higher than almost all developed countries (and many developing ones) even without any immigrants at all.

In a highly technical but seminal article in Demography in 1992, the leading academic journal in the field, economist Carl Schmertmann explored the impact of immigrants on population aging: “Constant inflows of immigrants, even at relatively young ages, do not necessarily rejuvenate low-fertility populations. In fact, immigration may even contribute to population aging.” As the Census Bureau concluded in 2000, in the long run, immigration is a “highly inefficient” means for increasing the percentage of the population that is of working age.

The newest Census Bureau population projections, released in May of last year, show the same thing. The “high-immigration” projections show that if net immigration totals 67 million by 2060, 57 percent of the U.S. population will be of working age (18 to 64). The “low-immigration” projection (33 million fewer) show 56 percent will be of working age in 2060. Roughly doubling immigration changes the working-age share by about 1 percentage point.

Equally important, the big problem over the past decade and more has not been a shortage of working-age people, but rather that so many people who are of working age do not work. This decline in work began before the recent recession; the share of native-born, working-age Americans holding a job was lower at the economic peak in 2007 than it was at the prior peak in 2000. It deteriorated even more dramatically after 2007, of course, and has barely improved since. As a result, today there are 17 million more working-age natives who are not working than there were in 2000.

Getting several million of these people back into jobs would have a much larger impact on improving the worker-to-nonworker ratio than any likely increase in legal immigration. Immigrants arrive at all ages, and, as with any human population, some work and some do not. By definition, moving working-age natives into jobs shifts the ratio of workers to non-workers more dramatically.

40 posted on 06/16/2014 2:23:03 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

LOL....


41 posted on 06/16/2014 3:34:58 PM PDT by b4its2late (A Progressive is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Good stuff, a lot of which I did not know. Thanks for posting. Good luck to Brat in the general.


42 posted on 06/17/2014 6:15:12 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Thanks for sharing Kerry in Paris info and being only 20 at the time just didn't register in the old memory.
43 posted on 06/17/2014 3:36:15 PM PDT by cashless (Obama told us he would side with Muslims if the political winds shifted in an ugly direction. Ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cashless

You are welcome. I am sure there are many who are much younger than you who have no idea. A friend of mine was in Vietnam wearing a USMC uniform at the time and never heard of this until I told him a few weeks ago. FWIW the “two delegations” mentioned were the N. Vietnamese and the Viet Cong. There was no one from South Vietnam in attendance. Kerry was still a commisioned Naval officer at the time as well although it would have been treason even for a civilian.


44 posted on 06/17/2014 3:43:20 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson