Skip to comments.Daily Beast: St. Joan of Arc Was a Transgender
Posted on 06/16/2014 10:08:11 AM PDT by chessplayer
Was St. Joan of Arc a medieval French heroine who followed Gods instructions and united her country against the marauding English? Or was she a dude Jay Michaelson sat next to in his Queer Theory survey class?
No, she wasn’t.
She was a sister who really cooked.
That is a disgusting thing to say.
Revisionist History with a particular bias continues on it’s merry, shutterblinded way, with the dark arts of speculation now disquised as facts. What next? “Evidence” that Orville and Wilbur Wright were ‘more than just brothers’?
Joan of Arc: Enduring Power
Celebrate the 600th Birthday of Saint Joan of Arc one of the worlds greatest patriots
A rare birthday present for St. Joan of Arc
Saint Joan of Arc (Activities for Families) [Catholic Caucus]
On St. Joan of Arc
Celebrate the Birthday Today of Greatest Freedom Fighter in History- Joan of Arc
Church remembers St. Joan of Arc
100th Anniversary of Joan of Arcs Beatification
When history clashes with fact, rewrite both to fit the moment. It’s the liberal creed.
Joan of Arc was probably one of the hottest women of all time.
Just homos trying to claim a legendary figure as their own. As it stands most seem to come from The Arts sector.
Jay’s got some issues he has yet to work out.
Queen Elizabeth 1 may have been a man according to painting and theory.
She wore male military clothing. Therefore she HAD to be a man, according to lib-logic.
Because the French royals were so much superior to the English royals (who were all first cousins and total despots).
The “secret” reason why the English burned Joan of Ark at the Stake! (sarc)
My uncle told me once that the French practically lost every war except for one time, that was with Joan of Arc.............but they burned her at the stake to make sure that never happened again
Ah, so Anne Boleyn, knowing how desperate Henry was for a son, passed the son she bore off as a girl and went to the chopping block living a unnecessary lie?
Whatever the hell for?
Joan was subjected to physical examination to prove that she was a maiden. But you know, it was the middle ages, so they might have overlooked a few things ....
There was a segment on The Hitler Channel or one of its brethren where they looked at Joan of Arc and suggested she might have been schizophrenic.
The symptoms and historic record are a pretty good match...
If she was mentally ill that would be evidence of a royal birth connection.
>>If she was mentally ill that would be evidence of a royal birth connection.<<
Or a democrat...
Even this story doesn’t get it’s facts straight. It claims Elizabeth was Henry’s favorite child, even after the birth of Edward. Yet it turns around and says Henry saw her rarely, so he was easily fooled. Who spends so little time with a ‘favorite’ that he can be fooled?
The most likely explanation for Elizabeth’s appearance and personality is that she was a lesbian.
When Satanists support a public policy agenda,you have crap like this.
That is not funny. It is disgusting.
There are some real sickos on this forum. Just a few. But notable.
He’s insane and incredibility stupid for trying to rewrite history.
The woman hated Britain. She went into battle and the people followed her. Pretty obvious why she wore that armor and men’s clothing; what else was there to protect yourself with. She didn’t take any excuses of what was being done. She was a very brave woman. The liberals will do anything to jab Christianity even to spreading their lies. Their minds are positively negative and hateful.
The liberals will do anything to jab Christianity even to spreading their lies.
If the French LOST the Hundred Years War, England would become SO Gallicized and France-oriented that its political evolution - AND OURS - would have gone in an entirely different direction.
Those voices which were talking to Joan of Arc are speaking to US now if only we were astute enough to hear them.
Liberals. Gay route/ to help their agenda.
Ridiculous. Revisionist history at its very WORST.
Take two aspirins and call me in the morning if you are not better.
How many schizophrenics become first-class generals and masters of seige-artillery?
He must of forgot about the napoleonic wars heh.
Were they qualified?
Well she got cooked on the charge of cross dressing.
>>How many schizophrenics become first-class generals and masters of seige-artillery?<<
How many become world-class, fewer-than-one-in-a-generation mathematicians?
One thing has nothing to do with the other. If her illness was incorporated into her life, it may have even helped.
But it wasn’t “the French” who burned her at the stake. She was captured, tried and burnt at Rouen, an English stronghold, by the Burgundians, who were allied with the English.
So if you're going to attack Christianity, it racks up double the points id you attack Catholic heroines.
My uncle knew that but he was making a joke.
Very true, Mrs. Don-o.
When you conflate history with religious dogma both ends up pretty worthless..
Not sure what you’re getting at here.
That doenst make sense.
The english court could not find fault in her beliefs other than her apparel so they ended up judging her guilty and killing her because she wore men’s clothes. She wore pants in order not to get raped. When incarcerated they gave her lady clothes which she wore, and the later she fought off one of the jailors that tried to rape her, and requested again pants instead of a skirt. That sealed her fate. She was a girl that wore pants.
I have noticed that as well, they are indeed very irritating , almost as much as those with no sense of humor.