Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Notice Filed in Federal Court on Obama’s Treason Against the US
Conservative Tribune ^ | June 17 2014 | Conservative Tribune

Posted on 06/17/2014 12:22:26 PM PDT by PoloSec

When Barack Obama made the Bergdahl trade, an obvious breach of U.S. policy to not negotiate with terrorists, many around the country were outraged.

The anger has continued to build as information about the rescued Army Sargent has surfaced indicating that he deserted his post and may have been working with the enemy to kill American troops.

These actions, coupled with the VA scandal and Benghazi cover up, all which point back to the president, have led some to believe that impeaching the Obama isn’t going to be enough.

Many in Congress and across the nation believe the president should be prosecuted, possibly even charged with treason for his actions, as he has violated his oath of office and helped America’s enemies by releasing terrorist leaders.

California Attorney Orly Taitz has taken action on this notion by filing a notice with the federal court accusing Obama of treason.

via Freedom Outpost:

On Friday, California Attorney Orly Taitz put US District Court Judge Ellen L. Hollander on notice of Barack Hussein Obama’s treason following the release of five top Taliban jihadists in an illegal prisoner trade for an American deserter, Bowe Bergdahl.

In her emergency motion, Orly Taitz stated:

NOTICE OF TREASON COMMITTED BY THE HOLDER OF THE STOLEN CONNECTICUT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER xxx-xx-4425 OF HARRY BOUNEL, RISK TO NATIONAL SECURITY.

MOTION TO EXPEDITE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, EXPEDITE RELASE OF THE SS-5 TO SSN XXX-XX-4425 OF HARRY BOUNEL FRAUDULENTLY ASSUMED BY BARRY

SOETORO, AKA BARRY SOEBARKAH, AKA BARACK OBAMA.

MOTION TO EXPEDIENTLY FORWARD TO THE FEDERAL GRAND JURY UNDER 18 USC 3332 OR ORDER BY THE COURT TO THE US ATTORNEY TO FORWARD TO THE FEDERAL

GRAND JURY EVIDENCE OF OBAMA’S USE OF A STOLEN CT SSN XX-XX-4425 AND BOGUS IDS, AS WELL AS RECENT ACT OF TREASON BY OBAMA, AKA SOETORO, AKA SOEBARKAH.

Taitz defined treason as 18 U.S. Code § 2381 does:

“Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”

This emergency motion regarding the treason of Barack Obama was denied by the judge, but it’s good to see at least that some people are using the legal process to finally hold Obama accountable.

Taitz is right. The president has provided material aid to the enemy by releasing terrorist leaders back onto the battlefield. These individuals will no doubt rejoin the Taliban and be a great asset in their attacks on Americans. This is already happening in Iraq, as al-Qaeda forces are taking over parts of the country, all led by an individual released by Obama in 2009.

It’s time for all Americans to stand up and loudly call for Barack Obama to be impeached and possibly even tried for treason. Only through the united voice of the people will Congress move to take this action.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; bobbergdahl; bowebergdahl; gitmo; obama; treason

1 posted on 06/17/2014 12:22:26 PM PDT by PoloSec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

You never know.


2 posted on 06/17/2014 12:24:20 PM PDT by Lee'sGhost ("Just look at the flowers, Lizzie. Just look at the flowers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

In before the inevitable attacks and mentions of Taitz’s screw-ups, all the while ignoring the elephant-sized donkey crimes in the room.


3 posted on 06/17/2014 12:26:54 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec; maggief; hoosiermama; LucyT; crosslink; Liz; null and void; onyx

Polosec, thanks for posting this!

All y’all ping to this topic!


4 posted on 06/17/2014 12:27:39 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
The freeing of Jihadists should be enough, to lump in the SSN issue here when it's not relevant will almost make sure this effort fails.
The stolen SSN is probably an impeachable offense by itself IMHO.

5 posted on 06/17/2014 12:28:45 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Maybe just maybe, something will come of this. Hats off to the brave Patriot who at least took the initiative.


6 posted on 06/17/2014 12:29:01 PM PDT by Lucky2 (Impeach the bastard and his fugly wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Impeachment is the only recourse against a sitting president.


7 posted on 06/17/2014 12:30:14 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (Obama: Race is his cover...jihad is his game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Whatev...

She’s tenacious at least...

Sooner or later scrambled eggs will be served...


8 posted on 06/17/2014 12:30:22 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Never going to happen. Virtually the entire Congress is in on the Treason with him.


9 posted on 06/17/2014 12:30:56 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucky2

Sadly, it will probably soon be ruled he has no standing or some such.


10 posted on 06/17/2014 12:31:15 PM PDT by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

Doesn’t the president, including the Hero of Benghazi, have the authority to change or set this policy?


11 posted on 06/17/2014 12:32:44 PM PDT by morphing libertarian ( On to impeachment and removal (IRS, Taliban, Fast and furious, VA, Benghazi)!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
Taitz will be roundly dismissed as a whack-job.

It should be noted, however, that there are those who would have paid many millions, or more, in stolen funds or oil money to secure the release of those five combatants.

12 posted on 06/17/2014 12:33:53 PM PDT by frog in a pot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost

I’m sure this will be the lead story on the alphabet soup TV news programs.


13 posted on 06/17/2014 12:35:34 PM PDT by Ed Condon (subliminal messages here in invisible ink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
Do you have a copy of the filing? In (which court?)

Thanks.

14 posted on 06/17/2014 12:39:49 PM PDT by yoe (I voted against that incompetent, lying, flip-flopping, insincere, double-talking, radical-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Another laughable MSM moment.


15 posted on 06/17/2014 12:43:20 PM PDT by SkyDancer (If you don't read the newspapers you are uninformed. If you do read newspapers you are misinformed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
Does Obamadullah go on television asking illegals to STOP coming to America???? Noooooooooo!.. He GOES ON TELEVISION TO PRAISE THEM, ESCALATING THE ILLEGAL INVASION OF AMERICA!!!!!!

Obama could be arrested for treason for violating his Oath of Office to protect America from invasion.

16 posted on 06/17/2014 12:43:31 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

It will go before one of Obama’s new African American Gay Judges


17 posted on 06/17/2014 12:48:47 PM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
Orly ..... why did it have to be Orly?!
18 posted on 06/17/2014 12:49:06 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
These actions, coupled with the VA scandal and Benghazi cover up, all which point back to the president, have led some to believe that [impeaching the Obama isn’t going to be enough].

Does that mean he could be placed under arrest forthwith and perp-walked out of the Oval Office.

19 posted on 06/17/2014 12:55:50 PM PDT by luvbach1 (We are finished. It will just take a while before everyone realizes it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Suppose a Federal Judge agreed that beyond a reasonable doubt, Obama has committed treason. Just exactly what could the Judge do about it?


20 posted on 06/17/2014 12:58:58 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
Impeachment is the only recourse against a sitting president.

You're probably right and there's never been a precedent for anything else. But if a president committed a violent crime and was considered a danger to himself an/or others, he would have to be arrested. Not suggesting that the Obamanation falls into that category...yet.

21 posted on 06/17/2014 12:59:26 PM PDT by luvbach1 (We are finished. It will just take a while before everyone realizes it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Issue a ruling. Do what any judge normally does.

Doesn’t mean he’d be arrested, per se.

Shall we just pretend he isn’t destroying the nation?

And if so, what legal method of remedy do you suggest?


22 posted on 06/17/2014 1:03:29 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

I believe if he even thought of it soebarkah would say, “Who cares?”


23 posted on 06/17/2014 1:04:07 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Where I’m coming from on my question, is this: If a Federal Judge believed the story, and he could do something about it which could put Obama’s Presidency in jeopardy, what would it be? If the Judge ruled that there was sufficient evidence to show that a fraud was committed, could the Judge issue a ruling that invalidated the 2012 election?


24 posted on 06/17/2014 1:15:06 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Dunno. No doubt they’d try to escalate it to the SC.

Which has been pre-stacked.

It’s a bizarre thing to witness the death of this nation.


25 posted on 06/17/2014 1:16:32 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost

Fedex, how much to send a snowball to hell?


26 posted on 06/17/2014 1:18:45 PM PDT by 12th_Monkey (One man one vote is a big fail, when the "one" man is an idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
27 posted on 06/17/2014 1:27:04 PM PDT by MtnMan101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
California Attorney Orly Taitz...

And I stopped reading right there.

28 posted on 06/17/2014 1:30:45 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
If the President is incapacitated, he can be relieved of duty immediately (by what procedure, I do not know) and power is assumed by the VP.

Here is an excellent article on Presidential prosecution while sitting...On Prosecuting Presidents. They are immune.

29 posted on 06/17/2014 1:33:11 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (Obama: Race is his cover...jihad is his game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 5thGenTexan
Sadly, it will probably soon be ruled he has no standing or some such.

He's a she. Orly Taitz

30 posted on 06/17/2014 1:34:08 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yoe
"Do you have a copy of the filing? In (which court?)"

I don't have that info, but I'm sure some one will find it eventually or post another article from another source with more detailed information.

31 posted on 06/17/2014 1:50:47 PM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

32 posted on 06/17/2014 1:53:40 PM PDT by pke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Oh. Totally missed it was her on this one. Scanning too much and not reading.


33 posted on 06/17/2014 2:06:25 PM PDT by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

!


34 posted on 06/17/2014 2:10:22 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Bathhouse/"Rustler" Reid? d8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost

Even a broken clock is right twice a day...


35 posted on 06/17/2014 2:15:05 PM PDT by Delta Dawn (Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

The case is over. The expedited motion was granted and then the reconsideration motion was denied.


36 posted on 06/17/2014 2:51:39 PM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 42 Filed 06/13/14 Page 1 of 1

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is, this 13th day of June, 2014, by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, ORDERED:

1. The “Motion for Reconsideration” (ECF 38) is DENIED; and

2. ECF 40 is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. In particular, the "Motion to Expedite Motion for Reconsideration” is GRANTED. In all other respects, ECF 40 is DENIED.

Ellen Lipton Hollander

United States District Judge

37 posted on 06/17/2014 3:14:32 PM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

this will go nowhere. I hope I am wrong...


38 posted on 06/17/2014 4:51:05 PM PDT by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

If there is a reason for treason charges it would be linking the White House to organizing the massive influx of children illegally crossing the border.


39 posted on 06/17/2014 5:56:24 PM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson