Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Black Caucus targets Goodlatte in push for voting rights fix
The Hill ^ | June 18, 2014 | Mike Lillis

Posted on 06/18/2014 11:31:25 AM PDT by jazusamo

The head of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) is pushing House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) to take up legislation restoring the voting rights protections shot down by the Supreme Court last year.

Democratic leaders and others urging consideration of the bipartisan bill to update the 1965 Voting Rights Act (VRA) have previously focused their pressure campaign on House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.).

But with Boehner showing little interest and Cantor soon to exit leadership after last week's primary loss, CBC Chairwoman Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio) switched gears Wednesday and turned the pressure directly on Goodlatte, whose panel has jurisdiction over the issue. "Voter discrimination is real in America," Fudge told reporters after a meeting of the Democratic Caucus in the Capitol. "We have a voting rights bill that has been sitting in this House for months and months. It is being held up by Chairman Goodlatte.

“Mr. Goodlatte, help us fulfill the promise of America and bring this bill to the floor," she said.

Goodlatte responded Wednesday with a brief statement in which he vowed to protect voting rights, but declined to reveal either his position on the bill or whether he intends to consider it this year.

"I fully support protecting the voting rights of all Americans," he said in an email. "As Congress determines whether additional steps are needed to protect those rights, I will carefully consider legislative proposals addressing the issue."

Among GOP leaders, Cantor has shown the most interest in moving the VRA update proposal this year. The Virginia Republican has been in talks with civil rights groups and lawmakers in both parties – including prominent members of the Black Caucus – in search of a compromise.

Yet a growing number of Democrats have charged that Cantor, all along, only gave lip service to legislation he had never endorsed and never intended to move on the floor.

"I never had any confidence that Mr. Cantor was going to match deeds with his words in the first place," Rep. Jim Clyburn (S.C.), the third-ranking House Democrat and a leading CBC member, said Wednesday. "There was never indication that he would."

Clyburn said Cantor's fall shouldn't affect the fate of the legislation.

"I really believe all this rests on the chair of the committee," Clyburn said.

In its 5-4 decision last June, the Supreme Court struck down the VRA's decades-old coverage formula, which had required certain states to get federal approval before changing election rules. The law had applied on a blanket basis to nine states – most of them in the South – with documented histories of racial discrimination.

Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts said that while Congress has the authority to monitor elections for fairness, the coverage formula is outdated and therefore unconstitutional.

Roberts invited Congress to "draft another formula based on current conditions."

In January, Reps. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), former chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and John Conyers (D-Mich.), the ranking member of the panel, introduced legislation designed to do just that.

Under their bill, states with five violations of constitutional voting protections or federal voting laws over the last 15 years would be forced to get pre-clearance from Washington before altering their election procedures.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) has introduced companion legislation in the upper chamber. Leahy's panel is scheduled to examine that bill on June 25, which marks the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court decision that launched the debate.

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cbc; fudge; goodlatte; votingrightsact
The Voting Rights Act is as antiquated as the Congressional Black Caucus. I wonder what the Congressional White Caucus has to say about this...Oh wait...
1 posted on 06/18/2014 11:31:25 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Were those WHITE panthers intimidating voters in Philadelphia? Race baiting MORONS!

2 posted on 06/18/2014 11:33:22 AM PDT by defconw (LUTFA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

They won’t have to push him or any other Republican too hard.

3 posted on 06/18/2014 11:40:42 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

What levers do they have to apply pressure, apart from getting in his face?

4 posted on 06/18/2014 11:40:53 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Holder and his Injustice Dept sues states for passing voter ID bills that only discriminate against illegal votes. We know for certain if any state tried to change a voting law that truly discriminated against any minority he’d be all over them.

5 posted on 06/18/2014 11:42:08 AM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

None that I can think of, this is DOA in my view.

RINO Sensenbrenner is the main Repub for the change and he doesn’t have much support.

6 posted on 06/18/2014 11:44:34 AM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It’s settled law.

Deal with it!

7 posted on 06/18/2014 12:02:46 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz ("Heck of a reset there, Hillary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Congressional Black Caucus , Living in the 60’s man

8 posted on 06/18/2014 1:43:01 PM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
The Anti-Federalists had a legitimate, real dispute over the “times, places, manner” clause of Article I, Section 4.

The only antidote is to return the states to the senate.

9 posted on 06/18/2014 3:25:45 PM PDT by Jacquerie (To restore the 10th Amendment, repeal the 17th. Article V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson