Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Megyn Kelly to Dick Cheney: Wrong, sir
politico ^ | 6-19-2014 | Kendall Breutman

Posted on 06/19/2014 5:48:13 AM PDT by yldstrk

FOX News’ Megyn Kelly had some tough questions for former Vice President Dick Cheney on Wednesday night, after he and his daughter, Liz, offered a scathing review of the Obama administration’s foreign policy.

“In your op-ed [in the Wall Street Journal], you write as follows: ‘Rarely has a U.S. president been so wrong about so much at the expense of so many,” Kelly said on her show “The Kelly File.” “But time and time again, history has proven that you got it wrong as well sir.” Continue Reading Text Size

- + reset

Latest on POLITICO

Kerry on Cheney: 'Please! Rubio: Obama is 'over' After uproar, paper drops Will column Playbook: Axelrod reveals book title Starbucks CEO brewed tuition deal Condi Rice: Wait for history to judge

Kelly then began listing shortcomings of the Bush administration, pointing out Cheney’s statements that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, that the U.S. forces would be considered liberators and that Iraqi insurgency was “in the throes” in 2005.

Cheney responded that invading Iraq was “the right thing” and that it would have been “irresponsible for us not to act.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/06/dick-cheney-megyn-kelly-fox-interview-108049.html#ixzz355ZX5OFe

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: cheney; iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-115 next last
What caused Megan to lose her mind?
1 posted on 06/19/2014 5:48:13 AM PDT by yldstrk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Murdock meeting with Valerie Jarrett?


2 posted on 06/19/2014 5:50:10 AM PDT by Madam Theophilus (iI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

new Fox news policy

“Fair Means Unbalanced”

Meggie, Cheney never claimed to have been right all the time, he claimed no president (which he was not) has ever been wrong more times than Obama

shame on you


3 posted on 06/19/2014 5:51:14 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

I don’t know. When is her contract up, and which channel/network does she want want to move to?


4 posted on 06/19/2014 5:52:19 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

She should have waited to do the interview after watching Hannity’s show. He had an excellent montage of various high profile democrats making the case for going into Iraq. It was priceless.


5 posted on 06/19/2014 5:53:14 AM PDT by jersey117 (greta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

She doesn’t kiss butt. That’s why her numbers are so high.


6 posted on 06/19/2014 5:53:23 AM PDT by B4Ranch (Name your illness, do a Google & YouTube search with "hydrogen peroxide". Do it and be surprised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

I am so sick of that weapons of mass destruction argument! No one EVER points out how much time Saddam Hussein was given to hide and distribute them with other ragheads.


7 posted on 06/19/2014 5:53:26 AM PDT by Slump Tester (What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

I never thought boots on the ground in Iraq was a good idea.

For the life of me, I can’t understand why Bush thought it was necessary when ...

1. We already had boots on the ground in Afghanistan

2. Sadam’s air force was effectively neutralized

3. Sadam had an iron grip on the Iraqi population and had no qualms about ruthlessly killing any and all opposition, including the islamo-fascists.

4. The Christian population was as secure as anybody else in Iraq.

5. Anything that needed to be done to Iraq could be done from the air or with Black Ops.

6. Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11, other than Saddam celebrating it.

7. Eventually a demonRAT would be elected that would reverse any and all gains made in Iraq, meaning that any American blood shed there would be wasted in vain.


8 posted on 06/19/2014 5:54:41 AM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

This is from Politico.. so I mistrust it more than Kelly

But did she really used the “no chemical weapons” line with Cheney?

It was Bill Clinton and HilLIARy and Kerry and many other democrats who said the same thing BEFORE Bush was even elected, and there are even pictures of the dead Iraqi people Saddam gassed in his own villages.


9 posted on 06/19/2014 5:54:57 AM PDT by Mr. K (Palin/Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Cheney is wrong about Iraq. Democracy building in that region is a dumb idea. Whether its republican or democrat who tries it. Democracy is contrary to their religion. Its not going to work. We got our guys all shot up working on a plan that could never be successful.


10 posted on 06/19/2014 5:55:09 AM PDT by kjam22 (my music video "If My People" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74b20RjILy4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Saddam has WMDs; he shipped them to Syria before the war. There is no other explanation for how Syria obtained WMDs.


11 posted on 06/19/2014 5:55:57 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

I saw this segment, and thought that Cheney answered brilliantly.


12 posted on 06/19/2014 5:55:59 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester
No one EVER points out how...Putin has been allegedly destroying "Syria's" poison gas weapons for months.
13 posted on 06/19/2014 5:56:26 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (June IS "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
Megan did not lose her mind at all, she was serving two purposes at once: first, she was doing what any good reporter would do asking questions that went to the heart of the issue and, second, she was teeing up all of the criticisms which had been mounted against Cheney and his editorial comment by the left and giving him the platform to hit them out.

You can do that with an experienced and intelligent interlocutor like Dick Cheney or a Ted Cruz but you have to be careful if you try it with a George Bush.

She was doing Cheney a favor, she was giving him a microphone and a megaphone. At the end of the interview she gave him softball questions.

If only the mainstream media behaved him him this way we would be in control the White House as well as the Senate.


14 posted on 06/19/2014 5:57:15 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

The way I saw it was that she was asking the questions that others were asking. The questions were asked in a manner that Cheney could defend himself. That became clear to me after the follow up questions. It did not appear to me that they were gotcha questions. That was just my take on the interview.


15 posted on 06/19/2014 5:57:23 AM PDT by certrtwngnut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Stardom is going to her head!


16 posted on 06/19/2014 6:01:11 AM PDT by SIRTRIS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Megan is slowly developing the “O’Reilly syndrome”, becoming obsessed with her own “importance” in her new time slot. Next thing we know, she’ll be writing mindless books and using the last ten minutes of her show hawking them!

I have stopped watching her, and Greta, as their left-lean becomes more pronounced daily. It’s what happens when you put lawyers in charge.


17 posted on 06/19/2014 6:01:35 AM PDT by FrankR (They will become our ultimate masters the day we surrender the 2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

I actually thought it was a fair interview. She always plays devil’s advocate. I think she needed to ask the tough questions, instead of being a Hannity type cheerleader. I mean every poll has a huge majority saying it was a mistake to enter Iraq. And here is the guy who orchestrated it, claiming that Obama is always wrong (which he is). She sort of put him on trial, and allowed him to answer the tough questions. She was respectful, and at the end got into pointing out how Biden claimed Iraq’s success was Obama’s achievement, and how Obama blew it with the status of force issue.


18 posted on 06/19/2014 6:02:05 AM PDT by nhwingut (This tagline is for lease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

She beats up on both sides equally.


19 posted on 06/19/2014 6:03:50 AM PDT by verga (Conservative, leaning libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

I suppose we’ll never fully know all the “real” reasons Bush felt it was necessary to stick troops on the ground.

According to wiki leaks - Iraq did attempt to purchase yellow cake (contradicting Plame’s hubby)

I’m old enough to remember when Gore tried to appear macho & accuse Bush 41 of not finishing the job & ousting Sadaam.

Sometimes I wonder if there’s something to the theory W was taking care of unfinished business.


20 posted on 06/19/2014 6:04:39 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
What caused Megan to lose her mind?

She didn't lose her mind. In asking devil's advocate questions, she was acting as an effective interviewer--and the Cheneys rose to the occasion in their responses.

21 posted on 06/19/2014 6:05:41 AM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

If I knew then what I know now I would feel differently about it. I suspect plenty of people would.


22 posted on 06/19/2014 6:05:43 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

Actually, I think all of this - the second Iraq war and the ensuing deaths of thousands of Americans - can be laid at the feet of George Herbert Walker Bush.

In Desert Storm, this country and the coalition he assembled utterly routed the Iraqis from Kuwait (later, deeply into IRAQ - to the outskirts of Baghdad, even.)

Accounts of the two (or three?) F15s that massacred an entire column of fleeing Iraqis (booty and plunderings accompanying) are legendary.

Bush (1) had the power to apprehend and contain Iraq’s Hussein in his hands. Instead, he listened to a lilly-livered RINO Secretary of State (Powell) who was just in the beginnings of his own insurgency toward this government masquerading as concern for the optics of the “Highway of Death”, and Bush (1) stopped dead cold short of the prize that could have saved several thousand soldiers’ lives a decade later.


23 posted on 06/19/2014 6:06:13 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

She’s interviewing for a slot on CNN —


24 posted on 06/19/2014 6:06:18 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Exactly. You attack a country, but leave the leader in power, he will try to eventually exact revenge.


25 posted on 06/19/2014 6:07:58 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

“I never thought boots on the ground in Iraq was a good idea.”

Agreed. To the extent military action needed to be taken, bomb them to smithereens. Then get out and stay out.

Another lie was “the Iraqis will pay for it with their oil revenue.” Let them build their own schools, roads, hospitals, water plants, etc., etc. But, of course, as always, the American taxpayers got stuck with the hundreds of billions of dollars of bills so that we could “win their hearts and minds.”


26 posted on 06/19/2014 6:08:22 AM PDT by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

F fox,Megan Kelly, Brit Hume etc...


27 posted on 06/19/2014 6:08:36 AM PDT by Post5203 (For the first time in my life, I despise this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
Iraq's missing WMDs were used on the Syrian people.
28 posted on 06/19/2014 6:09:38 AM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

29 posted on 06/19/2014 6:09:39 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Progressive is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Curious. Why would she do that? Viewership there would be down several fold.

What got her where she is today is hard driving logical and reasoned thought, argument and determination in the face of illogical and hysterical progressivism.

I don’t see where this would buy her anything except money.


30 posted on 06/19/2014 6:09:48 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF

I agree with you...Megyn Kelly did the right thing....she set-up Cheney and then quietly let him respond in total....which he and his daughter did brillantly!!!!


31 posted on 06/19/2014 6:10:09 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX ( My only objective is to defeat and destroy Obama & his Democrat Party, politically!!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
I agree with your assessment.

Ask the Looney Tunes questions the left always spews and let him annihilate it.

32 posted on 06/19/2014 6:10:28 AM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (Historians will refer to this administration as "The Half-Black Plague.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
Bush made his case before the American people the US Congress and before the United Nations multiple times

Saddam's violations of UN Security Council provisions, that led to the UN backing the US/allied invasion on 2003, were not just about WMD

Although the WMD assessments came from the UN inspectors themselves who were increasingly blocked by Saddam from inspections - yet another violation of UN security council provisions (why?) - and most foreign intel services, not just the US community

Russia itself right after 9-11 warned Pres Bush that another terror attack was planned from Iraq - maybe disinformation (if so why? since the Russians had some in country advisors and control over Iraqi WMD which was reported being convoyed by Russians under diplomatic protection out of Iraq and into Syria, just before the 2003 invasion); the Russian warning added to the information Bush had about follow-on threats in the first 30-90 days after 911

You may disagree with Pres Bush's case
But you can't say you didn't understand it unless you didn't try

33 posted on 06/19/2014 6:10:42 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester

The WMD argument is a legitimate Bush gripe, no matter how you look at it. We went into Iraq with a primary goal being the removal of Saddam’s WMD’s. It turned out there were no WMD’s in Iraq, and we were all misled by bad intelligence.

Even if Saddam somehow succeeded in smuggling them out of the country, as you seem to think is the case, then it’s even more disastrous for the Bush Administration; not only did Bush and Cheney fail to destroy the WMD’s but they were hoodwinked into believing there were no WMD’s when they had in fact fallen into the hands of other Muslims.


34 posted on 06/19/2014 6:11:07 AM PDT by Corporate Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

I saw the interview and I thought that Megyn was tough but fair with Mr. Cheney and Liz. She asked the tough questions, but allowed him the chance to answer them. What more can we ask? Don’t we criticize the leftist reporters for not asking the tough questions to people like Obama and his cronies. Remember, we’re on the right side here. All we should ask for is a fair opportunity to defend ourselves which both Cheneys did very well at.

Unlike when I saw Erin Burnett on CNN interviewing Paul Bremmer taking the Obama administrations side while interrogating him. They had a split screen on and you could see her smirk as she’s listening to his answers, then constantly interrupting him. That’s what we should be outraged about, not Megyn Kelley’s tough but fair questions.


35 posted on 06/19/2014 6:11:13 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

“For the life of me, I can’t understand why Bush thought it was necessary when ...”

Like any war, it is called geography. One of the major issues in the region was intelligence and reaching the enemy. Remember this, we were very hampered with fly zones in the ME. GWB gave us infrastructure in the ME, airfields, bases, hospitals, etc. Saddam HUSSEIN rolled out the red carpet with his international defiance, why not take the opportunity. I think we are seeing right now how important OWNING GEOGRAPHY is, unfortunately because of Obama’s lack of warrior intellect, we have lost everything in the ME and we will be revisited someday on our shores. Leaving Iraq will prove to be the beginning of the next deadly terrorist attack in the US.


36 posted on 06/19/2014 6:12:36 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Megyn Kelly is using Roger Ailes’ , (FOX’s CEO), “Be the Devil’s advocate” definition of “Fair and Balanced” questioning.

Top practitioners of this don’t-forget-the-obsolete-Liberals-point-of-view “Fair and Balanced” method are as follows:

# 1. Neil Cavoto

# 2. Bill O’Reilley

# 3. Megyn Kelley.

Rarely do any of these three pseudo journalists have guests with none-of-the-above Conservative opinions allowed to appear on their shows.

These three “Shows” are a notch above MSNBC Shows.

Note to Roger Ailes:

WE KNOW WHAT THE LIBERAL AND GOP-E POINTS OF VIEW ARE, SO STOP TELLING AND THUS PROMOTING THEIR HARMFUL IDEAS!


37 posted on 06/19/2014 6:12:56 AM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

The kind of thoughtful commentary that originally brought me to FR.

Well done.


38 posted on 06/19/2014 6:13:22 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost ("Just look at the flowers, Lizzie. Just look at the flowers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

and if Bush/Cheney had done nothing-—just sat on the report from Clinton holdover CIA head that told them Iraq had WMD’s, Clinton stated it also.............if Bush had done nothing could still hear the hue and cry from the left about the “soft” response.


39 posted on 06/19/2014 6:15:45 AM PDT by sbark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: certrtwngnut

My impression as well.


40 posted on 06/19/2014 6:16:00 AM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

+1 and ditto on the points.


41 posted on 06/19/2014 6:19:12 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

Bush 41 went into Iraq thinking he could stabilize the region and thus oil supply and oil prices.

Bush 43 went into Iraq to get even with saddam hussein for
making Bush 41 look bad.

IMHO, the net result now will be the US begging Iran to take control of Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon. Iran will not stop. A nuclear Iran eventually will expand wherever they want.

All that is happening now is just a smoke screen to give Iran time to build up their nuclear arsenal.


42 posted on 06/19/2014 6:19:19 AM PDT by jonose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

Liberals seem content to quibble over whether Saddam was “attempting to purchase yellowcake” and ignoring or belittling the fact that Saddam had amassed over 500 tons of yellowcake which was shipped to Canada in 2005 after the US invasion, when it was confirmed, discovered, secured and removed from Tuwaitha

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/07/07/iraq.uranium/index.html?_s=PM:US


43 posted on 06/19/2014 6:19:26 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

How did Cheney get it wrong? Bush/Cheney said there was al-Qaeda in Iraq. Correct. They said there were WMDs there. Correct (550 TONS of uranium was removed in 2007-—without any news fanfare). Just about the only thing they got wrong was not breaking up Iraq into three independent provinces, Kurdistan, Shiaa-ville, and central Iraq.


44 posted on 06/19/2014 6:20:44 AM PDT by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
...”She doesn't kiss butt. That’s why her numbers are so high”...

Exactly right! She followed that interview with a Glenn Beck interview, showing actual video from his 2011 predictions about what would take place in the Mideast in the near future and how he was mocked on MSNBC, CNN and others at the time for his insight. It is happening exactly as he predicted..He looks like a prophet and those media people look like fools. Meghan is the best thing on any network or cable outlet right now. She gets at the truth as best she can and does a darn good job of it. She is smart and assertive and I believe she is doing her best to get the truth to the American people.

45 posted on 06/19/2014 6:23:23 AM PDT by jazzlite (esat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

“6. Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11, other than Saddam celebrating it’

Nonsense.

To believe that you have to be too ignorant to know the 9/11 attack was an attack against the economy and the 9/11 attack was preceded by an orchestrated recession which was directly related to the Oil for Food Program and the smuggling of Iraqi oil driving the price of oil so low it created a worldwide recession.

The 9/11 attack was a 1-2 punch. Orchestrate a recession then attack the economic center.

SH even made a comment a few month before 9/11 something to the effect “soon America will be hit in it’s sore arm” meaning the economy.

SH played a big part in the preparations for the 9/11 attack.


46 posted on 06/19/2014 6:23:25 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
Actually most of the damage on the highway of Death was done by this magnificent machine and her amazing crew:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhCRSs1tWo8

The crew of this AC-130A Spectre gunship, named Azrael (Azrael, in the Koran, is the angel of death who severs the soul from the body) displayed courage and heroism during the closing hours of Operation Desert Storm. On Feb. 26, 1991, Coalition ground forces were driving the Iraqi army out of Kuwait. Azrael was sent to the Al Jahra highway between Kuwait City and Basrah, Iraq, to intercept the convoys of tanks, trucks, buses and cars fleeing the battle. Facing numerous enemy batteries of SA-6 and SA-8 surface-to-air missiles, and 37mm and 57mm radar-guided anti-aircraft artillery, the crew attacked the enemy skillfully, inflicting significant damage on the convoys. The crew's heroic efforts left much of the enemy's equipment destroyed or unserviceable, contributing to the defeat of the Iraqi forces. On Feb. 28, 1991, Iraq agreed to a cease-fire. The aircraft on display was assigned to the 919th Special Operations Wing and was retired to the museum in October 1995.

47 posted on 06/19/2014 6:26:21 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Bush and Cheney will be vindicated. Here’s how, Obama will do nothing and the Middle East will explode, gasoline will be $20 a gallon and people in the Northeast will not be able to heat their homes.

Then, people will wake up to the fact that oil runs the world and America does not have an energy policy, in fact we are outlawing coal, preventing much offshore drilling, failing to open ANWR, no Keystone pipeline, no new refineries, limited fracking, etc.


48 posted on 06/19/2014 6:27:42 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife
According to wiki leaks - Iraq did attempt to purchase yellow cake (contradicting Plame’s hubby)

I think you mean more Yellowcake. Iraq under Sadam Hussein already had 550 tons, which was subsequently bought by and shipped, to Canada. Yellow cake to Canada

49 posted on 06/19/2014 6:28:07 AM PDT by Timocrat (Ingnorantia non excusat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Post5203

While you at it, don’t forget to add our monkey eared commander in chief, bozo!!!!!!!!!


50 posted on 06/19/2014 6:28:16 AM PDT by Las Vegas Dave (The democRATic party preys on the ignorant..!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson