Skip to comments.It is Time for Conservatives to BLAME THE VIDEO for Benghazi Attacks in order to Impeach Obama
Posted on 06/19/2014 1:57:58 PM PDT by lilyramone
The Obama administrations role in making the anti-Muhammad video go viral on the day of the Benghazi attacks; its connection to the filmmaker (a Federal informant at the time); the claim from one of the actresses in the video that the filmmaker confessed to being a Muslim; and the filmmakers Muslim fundamentalist partner in crime all suggest that blaming the video for the attacks should be ill-advisable for the administration. Following its logic, the blood of four Americans and an untold number of victims of all protests related to the video are on the hands of the administration itself.
(Excerpt) Read more at shoebat.com ...
Can you post the proof here (links etc) that the admin was behind the video?
Montagraph put up a new video on May 1st. It is basically a refresher of his original findings of the connection between Stanley Inc., a DoD subcontractor, to the Innocence of Muslims video. He also shows when and by whom the name was changed.
Here is a video by another Vlogger who demonstrates how Innocence of Muslims was traced to Stanley Inc. through the meta-data.
anyone else tired of the stupidity of people always focusing on the wrong thing.
does not matter what caused the attack in Benghazi —
WHO THE HELL GAVE THE ORDER TO STAND DOWN AND LET FOUR AMERICANS DIE ?
Interesting that Nakoula the film maker is also a FedMob stooge.
Producer Of Anti-Islam Film Was Fed Snitch
L.A. man began cooperating after 2009 fraud bust
Interesting that Nakoula's websites track back to connections with 0bama.
Interesting that Nakoula's partner in the film was a palestinian Muslim with terrorist connections who was also watched by the Feds for three decades but never arrested and frequently bailed out by the Feds.
- Nakoula is a FedMob snitch.
- Nakoula's partner in the film was Eiad Salameh, a Palestinian Muslim.
- AFAIK Nakoula was never a film maker before. He was a check kiter.
- The film was not originally about Mohammed.
- Clips from the film were first aired on Egyptian TV just 3-4 days before Sept. 11th by a hardline 'tele-Islamist.'
- 0bama, Hillary and Rice have repeatedly made a point of saying that the U.S. gov had "nothing to do with the film." Something no one in the world would have ever thought.
- 0bama and Hillary have engaged in a major campaign of disinformation to blame the film and apologize for it.
Nakoula and Eiad may have made the film.
Someone else handled "distribution" and "promotion" in Egypt.
Its time for conservatives to ask why we apologize to our attackers, and leave the stupid video out of the question, especially as they’ve got a video sympathizer lined up waiting to be mirandized and ready to blame the video,
When is someone just anyone with a national audience going to say, the State dept has no business apologizing to people attacking our diplomats for provoking them?
Video or no stupid video
Go to shoebat.com, I have posted several articles from there which show his ongoing trail of the video to this administration.
Spend the time to read the articles which go back to the attack and take the time to see who Walid Shoebat is.
Too many articles to post in one reply, easier to send you to his site.
Well Obama is bringing one of the Benghazi attackers to DC(on a slow boat,wink) to help him out with the Video story
There is more than enough information floating around the public domain that a fantasy TV lawyer could prosecute and win A dog catcher could prosecute and win.
There is only one question that matters outside the obvious. That question is that with being true, why conservatives have allowed the only people with the power to do anything about it, to jump from one covering excuse to another delay, to flatly ignoring it.
THAT is the question. Because until it is dealt with and the people with the power to prosecute get ta’ skippin, this is just going down the memory hole as planned.
Perhaps we can prosecute THEM for dereliction.
THAT is the question.
The answer is simple. It isn't in the personal, electoral interest of most pubbies to do anything. To make a fuss could jeopardize their jobs.
It is the nature of democratic republics.
And that is of course the correct answer. the solution is voting them out of power. ‘No matter what’.
Because that little phrase works both ways. Much to the screaming fits of the RINO wing.
No, my point is that in the aggregate, we can send Tea Partiers to congress for the rest of the century without expectation of return to first principles.
IOW, to rely on the virtue alone of those we send to congress to secure liberty is foolish. The framing generation had experience with overly democratic governments which relied on individual virtue, like the one we have today. The failure of these first state governments to secure liberty is the reason Virginia put out a call for a constitutional convention.
The difference is that unlike today, those old white guys learned from their mistakes. Between 1776 and the later 1780’s, they figured out that POWER MUST BE DIVIDED TO SECURE LIBERTY.
The first, and most important division of power recognized by the framers was that between the states and the government created by the states.
This isn’t to say we shouldn’t send moral and virtuous people as best we can to congress. It means it is insufficient if freedom is our goal.
The constitution’s system of pre-17th Amendment checks must be restored
But unless we send principled people, and a truckload of them, there is zero chance of a return to principled governance. Ever.
I suppose you mean Judeo-Christian principles and not Islamic ones.
You assume correctly. they were good enough to carve into the wall of the USSC so I’ll stick with them.
There is nothing you’ve said that a conservative thinker should disagree with.
That was such a awful video. No production values at all. Here is one that can make Islamic Heads explode!
They have a article on that web sight saying that the company that created the Obamacare web sight is connected to that Muslim video.
All in the links to the article posted above.