Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It is Time for Conservatives to BLAME THE VIDEO for Benghazi Attacks in order to Impeach Obama
Shoebat.com ^ | June 19, 2014 | Walid Shoebat and Ben Barrack

Posted on 06/19/2014 1:57:58 PM PDT by lilyramone

The Obama administration’s role in making the anti-Muhammad video go viral on the day of the Benghazi attacks; its connection to the filmmaker (a Federal informant at the time); the claim from one of the actresses in the video that the filmmaker confessed to being a Muslim; and the filmmaker’s Muslim fundamentalist partner in crime all suggest that blaming the video for the attacks should be ill-advisable for the administration. Following its logic, the blood of four Americans and an untold number of victims of all protests related to the video are on the hands of the administration itself.

(Excerpt) Read more at shoebat.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazi; benghazicoverup; benghazivideo; nakoula; shoebat; tigerseye
It is Time for Conservatives to BLAME THE VIDEO for Benghazi Attacks in order to Impeach Obama
1 posted on 06/19/2014 1:57:58 PM PDT by lilyramone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lilyramone

Can you post the proof here (links etc) that the admin was behind the video?


2 posted on 06/19/2014 2:01:04 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lilyramone
DoD contractor connected to Nakoula Youtube video

Montagraph put up a new video on May 1st. It is basically a refresher of his original findings of the connection between Stanley Inc., a DoD subcontractor, to the Innocence of Muslims video. He also shows when and by whom the name was changed.

BUSTED Once And For All

Here is a video by another Vlogger who demonstrates how Innocence of Muslims was traced to Stanley Inc. through the meta-data.

Benghazi's Smoking Gun

3 posted on 06/19/2014 2:01:40 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lilyramone

anyone else tired of the stupidity of people always focusing on the wrong thing.

does not matter what caused the attack in Benghazi —

WHO THE HELL GAVE THE ORDER TO STAND DOWN AND LET FOUR AMERICANS DIE ?


4 posted on 06/19/2014 2:04:31 PM PDT by kingattax (a real American would rather die on his feet than live on his knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Interesting that Nakoula the film maker is also a FedMob stooge.

Producer Of Anti-Islam Film Was Fed Snitch
L.A. man began cooperating after 2009 fraud bust

Interesting that Nakoula's websites track back to connections with 0bama.

Proof Positive - In My Opinion (who created Innocence of Muslims)(Obama)

Interesting that Nakoula's partner in the film was a palestinian Muslim with terrorist connections who was also watched by the Feds for three decades but never arrested and frequently bailed out by the Feds.

Why is the Coptic Christian filmmaker partners in crime with Coptic Christian hater?

Innocence of Muslims made by Terrorists

Nakoula and Eiad may have made the film.
Someone else handled "distribution" and "promotion" in Egypt.


5 posted on 06/19/2014 2:04:59 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lilyramone

Its time for conservatives to ask why we apologize to our attackers, and leave the stupid video out of the question, especially as they’ve got a video sympathizer lined up waiting to be mirandized and ready to blame the video,

When is someone just anyone with a national audience going to say, the State dept has no business apologizing to people attacking our diplomats for provoking them?

Video or no stupid video


6 posted on 06/19/2014 2:06:19 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Go to shoebat.com, I have posted several articles from there which show his ongoing trail of the video to this administration.
Spend the time to read the articles which go back to the attack and take the time to see who Walid Shoebat is.
Too many articles to post in one reply, easier to send you to his site.


7 posted on 06/19/2014 2:07:18 PM PDT by lilyramone (The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lilyramone

Well Obama is bringing one of the Benghazi attackers to DC(on a slow boat,wink) to help him out with the Video story


8 posted on 06/19/2014 2:09:18 PM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lilyramone

There is more than enough information floating around the public domain that a fantasy TV lawyer could prosecute and win A dog catcher could prosecute and win.

There is only one question that matters outside the obvious. That question is that with being true, why conservatives have allowed the only people with the power to do anything about it, to jump from one covering excuse to another delay, to flatly ignoring it.

THAT is the question. Because until it is dealt with and the people with the power to prosecute get ta’ skippin, this is just going down the memory hole as planned.

Perhaps we can prosecute THEM for dereliction.


9 posted on 06/19/2014 2:15:27 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
why conservatives have allowed . . .

THAT is the question.

The answer is simple. It isn't in the personal, electoral interest of most pubbies to do anything. To make a fuss could jeopardize their jobs.

It is the nature of democratic republics.

10 posted on 06/19/2014 2:41:15 PM PDT by Jacquerie (To restore the 10th Amendment, repeal the 17th. Article V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

And that is of course the correct answer. the solution is voting them out of power. ‘No matter what’.

Because that little phrase works both ways. Much to the screaming fits of the RINO wing.


11 posted on 06/19/2014 2:43:58 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lilyramone

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/06/18/cia-operation-zero-footprint-qatar-benghazi-and-the-connection-to-ahmed-abu-khattala-is-the-real-motive-for-the-obama-administrations-recent-arrest/


12 posted on 06/19/2014 2:49:33 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie; kingattax; stanne
Do you know why?
13 posted on 06/19/2014 2:49:40 PM PDT by Baynative (How much longer will the media be able to prop up this administration?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart; Baynative

No, my point is that in the aggregate, we can send Tea Partiers to congress for the rest of the century without expectation of return to first principles.

IOW, to rely on the virtue alone of those we send to congress to secure liberty is foolish. The framing generation had experience with overly democratic governments which relied on individual virtue, like the one we have today. The failure of these first state governments to secure liberty is the reason Virginia put out a call for a constitutional convention.

The difference is that unlike today, those old white guys learned from their mistakes. Between 1776 and the later 1780’s, they figured out that POWER MUST BE DIVIDED TO SECURE LIBERTY.

The first, and most important division of power recognized by the framers was that between the states and the government created by the states.

This isn’t to say we shouldn’t send moral and virtuous people as best we can to congress. It means it is insufficient if freedom is our goal.

The constitution’s system of pre-17th Amendment checks must be restored


14 posted on 06/19/2014 4:05:03 PM PDT by Jacquerie (To restore the 10th Amendment, repeal the 17th. Article V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

But unless we send principled people, and a truckload of them, there is zero chance of a return to principled governance. Ever.


15 posted on 06/19/2014 4:13:40 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

“...principled people...”

I suppose you mean Judeo-Christian principles and not Islamic ones.


16 posted on 06/19/2014 4:58:50 PM PDT by charlie72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: charlie72

You assume correctly. they were good enough to carve into the wall of the USSC so I’ll stick with them.


17 posted on 06/19/2014 5:07:43 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

There is nothing you’ve said that a conservative thinker should disagree with.


18 posted on 06/19/2014 5:17:59 PM PDT by Baynative (How much longer will the media be able to prop up this administration?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lilyramone

That was such a awful video. No production values at all. Here is one that can make Islamic Heads explode!

19 posted on 06/19/2014 6:41:51 PM PDT by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lilyramone

They have a article on that web sight saying that the company that created the Obamacare web sight is connected to that Muslim video.


20 posted on 06/19/2014 10:18:17 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

All in the links to the article posted above.


21 posted on 06/20/2014 2:33:12 AM PDT by Ben Barrack (Let's Talk About Something Important!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
The constitution’s system of pre-17th Amendment checks must be restored

Agreed!

22 posted on 06/20/2014 4:04:59 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson