Posted on 06/19/2014 3:30:12 PM PDT by LeoWindhorse
Do you support plans to expand the Central Pacific marine sanctuary nearly ninefold, to 782,000 square miles?
A. Yes, it'll prevent overfishing (65%, 577 Votes) B. No, it'll hurt fishermen (35%, 315 Votes)
Total Votes: 892
(Excerpt) Read more at poll.staradvertiser.com ...
Do you support plans to expand the Central Pacific marine sanctuary nearly ninefold, to 782,000 square miles?
A. Yes, it’ll prevent overfishing (65%, 579 Votes)
B. No, it’ll hurt fishermen (35%, 318 Votes)
FReeped.
Needs work
Well yes, but he is also taking care of his donors in the aquaculture business (most likely Tyson Foods), putting small producers out of business to construct an oligopoly in fish.
It's a twofer! Ain't fascism fun!
There really ARE more fish in the sea: Scientists find deep sea species untouched by fishing makes up 95% of all fish in the world
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2572398/The-hidden-fish-make-95-marine-life.html
Obama believes himself to the king of the world.
Heck no! It’s just a federal power grab / another utopian scheme! And I didn’t even need to read it to know that.
That is what I was wondering too. How does the Obama
presume to make rules and regulations covering vast amounts of the ocean outside our territorial limits?
A. Yes, it’ll prevent overfishing (59%, 631 Votes)
B. No, it’ll hurt fishermen (41%, 442 Votes)
Total Votes: 1,073
this poll is clearly being counter-Freeped by some tree hugger fish kisser org
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.