Skip to comments.U.N. chief (Ban Ki Moon) warns against airstrikes on militants in Iraq
Posted on 06/20/2014 9:19:08 AM PDT by xzins
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon warned on Friday that airstrikes against Islamist militants in Iraq could be counter-productive unless moves were made to create an inclusive government.
(Excerpt) Read more at uk.reuters.com ...
UN re-enters Iraq debate.
I know the UN is worthless, but boy have they had some worthless Secretary Generals in recent years!
They’re MURDEROUS Islamic Militants for crap’s sake. Bomb, strafe, repeat.
Actually, it would make more sense to bomb the UN...then think about Iraq.
Think about it.
That’s right, lets make terrorists part of a legitimate government. How brilliant!
How long before we hear from Hans Blix?
“I know the UN is worthless, but boy have they had some worthless Secretary Generals in recent years!”
Man, Isn’t that the truth! I liked the Twin Towers in NYC, too bad the Muzzies didn’t do us all a favor and fly their planes into the UN HQ.
Don't nobody try to murder the murderers, 'cause that's murder ...
Will he also say: “no more bombing of buildings in New York City.”?
In fact, has any UN chief ever said that at all?
So I guess that carpet bombing with napalm made out of bacon grease is out of the question? Good, because I wouldn’t want to waste perfectly good bacon grease. So that leaves us with just carpet bombing.
The Iraqi have a Constitution and hold elections and forms government just as every nation that has a parliamentary styled democracy.Does Obama and the UN propose superseding the constitution? or what??
When was the last time anyone heard from the UN birdbrain?
[ I know the UN is worthless, but boy have they had some worthless Secretary Generals in recent years! ]
The UN can’t even pass a resolution condemnign the punishment of Apostates both relgious and Political by Governments...
They are beyond useless, we could save a LOT of money just telling the UN to go screw itself and also if we stopped giving money to countries that hate us...
Other than being a sink-hole for US tax money is the un anything other than a party for the “diplomatic corps” and their hanger-ons?
On Obama’s side, no less. No surprise there.
What is this quid pro quo crap all of a sudden?
Compare Maliki’s body count to those opposed to a “free” Iraq...
And supporting a Grand Caliphate..
As I recall these UN idiots supported a “free” Egypt and Libya not long ago. With their Obama, they were shown to be woefully ignorant.
Iraq probably will become 3 countries, and if it does break into people group regions, the UN needs to get out of the way.
Mr Moon. UN Sec.
OK. We fought two wars in Iraq. Set up a unified govmt, which the Iraqis didn’t want. And now we need a third war to give them what they didn’t want, don’t want, and will never want. Give me a break! And what about those poison gas stockpiles that the UN couldn’t find, but are now in the hands of the terrorists? And we could possibly care what the UN says?
And then when the terrorists are part of the Iraqi government, or all of it for that matter, Bay to the Moon will place them in charge of the U.N.’s terrorist watchdog committee.
Amen! Keep those wisdoms coming.
Did he comment on the potential productivity of air strikes on the UN HQ itself, or was that so obvious that it needed no commentary?
Note to humor-impaired .gov apparatchiks - that is obviously a joke.
Can we not petition to get this “body” to move to another country?
> Ban Ki-moon warned on Friday that airstrikes against Islamist militants in Iraq could be counter-productive unless moves were made to create an inclusive government.
The most productive thing would be to strap Ban Ki-moon to a MOAB and drop him and it on downtown Tehran.
UN is owned by the Sunni bloc.