Skip to comments.White House's Valerie Jarrett dines with Rupert Murdoch to plot immigration strategy
Posted on 06/20/2014 10:15:07 AM PDT by jimbo123
President Obama's longtime senior adviser Valerie Jarrett confessed to breaking bread this week with conservative media titan Rupert Murdoch, a new White House frenemy of sorts on immigration reform.
The two dined at the posh Blue Duck Tavern on Tuesday night in Washington's Foggy Bottom, and Jarrett described the evening as very enjoyable.
Good policy sometimes makes strange bedfellows, she told reporters at a breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor Friday, adding that she was impressed by Murdoch's passion for passing comprehensive immigration reform.
He is an immigrant himself and he understands from a business perspective how important immigration reform would be to our economy, she said. ... Sometimes decisions are tough but it's time for Congress to step up and act now and that's something he said privately to me, and I was heartened to see him express it publicly.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
The only way to stop these people is to really make the $ not matter. Tuesday will be huge, if their money, and they’re flooding Cochran’s campaign with cash, can win that election they’ll consider themselves home free.
If however, McDaniel can win we can make the fact that we’re outspent yet winners a big part of the conservative campaigns.
BAD policy makes typical bedfellows.
Talk about a dinner that needed be interrupted by a cruise missile...
President of the Untited States, Iranian born communist Valerie Jarrett, discussed advancing illegal immigration with media titan Rupert Murdoch.
(does Valerie have a food taster yet?)
(Time to change my tagline. Arrest President Valerie Jarrett.)
I’d worry about her catching fire at an event sponsored by Christians.
Most are missing the real connections, as described by James Carville. “Follow the money.”
Murdoch as about as conservative as the board of the American Conservative Union, both connected to the teats of Saudi petroleum profits. Murdoch is a major partner of Riyadh’s Kingdom Holdings lord Alwaleed bin-Talal. Bin-talal held, probably still holds, though Roger Ailes is now listed as owner, the largest block after Murdoch, of News Corp Stock. The ACU, guided by Grover Norquist, who may or may not have converted to Islam to join his Muslim wife, sponsored long time ACU board member, Suhail Kahn, devoted to the replacement of our Constitution with Sharia law, his father having been a founder of The Islamic Society of North America.
Valerie’s father-in-law, Vernon Jarrett, has long been a fried of Saudi family attorney, Khalid al-Mansour, who, according to Percy Sutton, was Barack’s patron, asking for Percy’s help getting Barry into Harvard. Khalid al-Mansour was known as Don Warden while he attended Berkeley’s Boalt Hall, while bin-Talal attended tony Menlo College acroos the SF Bay, and while al-Mansour opened a law firm in San Francisco with bin-Talal on the masthead, then calling himself Warden, though having converted to Wahhabi Islam in the mid 1960s.
This probably has much more to do with the business of spending American-generated wealth, money spent on Saudi oil, and insuring that the price remains high enough to insure the lives, and lifestyles of the Saudi Family. It may or may not explain our CIA Director’s conversion to Islam in or about 1997 (See Admiral James Lyon’s, former commander of the Pacific Fleet, and originator of the “Red Cell Program” within the Navy Seals, an elite group within and elite group).
This is about money, and slumlord Jarrett is very experienced at managing budgets for which no profits need be shown. Murdoch is not a conservative, any more than Soros is a conservative. Murdoch’s son has long been involved with launching a Saudi-approved competitor, based in Qatar, for Al-Jazeera. Alwaleed openly boasted of his control of editorial policy at his Wall Street Journal, which probably applies to Fox News. If it has not been scrubbed, it is no secret that Alwaleed donated twenty million dollars to Harvard just before Barry was admitted. His Alwaleed bin-Talal Center for Islamic Study, the largest division of Harvard Divinity School, now at Georgetown, American University, Cambridge, and a number other Universities, all representing a “religion” which doctrinally preaches Jihad, for all Muslims, and the conversion or subjugation or death of all non-believers.
The Saudi’s may or may not have miscalculated by directing their U.S. vassals, their President, their CIA Director, their U.S. State Department, while Hillary’s Chief of Staff was Huma Abedin, Muslim Brotherhood operative “until” she left to work for the Clintons, their Homeland Securit senior officer, Mohammed Elibiri, etc. etc. They destabilized the middle east, eliminating one after another leader who did not accept the much hated Muslim Brotherhood. But Iran has the means of destroying Saudi Arabia and its client states. Without U.S. protection Kuwait would be part of Iraq. Without the U.S. there would be no Saudi Arabia. Does Obama retain the power to suppress Iran after weakening our military, spending thousands of U.S. lives executing is mission to defend his real patron’s country, religion, and lives? Over ninety percent of U.S. lives lost in the Middle East after the first Gulf War, were lost after 2009.
Who does not understand why our framers insisted that our President and Commander in Chief have natural allegiance for our nation? Natural allegiance, as explained by our framers, five Chief Justices of our Supreme Court, Thomas Paine, the author of our first naturalization amendment, the 14, John Bingham explained it to Congress in 1866, with perfect clarity, explaining why his naturalization amendment did not alter the definition of natural born citizenship, required that our President by Article II Section 1, be born “...of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign Sovereignty.”
You have been distracted from the lessons embedded in our Constitution by clever sophistry. Our Constitution, by design, does not include definitions, according to Madison, because language changes over time. The definition is common-low, clear in twenty some Supreme court cases, and positive law in Minor v. Happersett - “Born on our soil to parents who were its citizens.”
I just noticed that the “fix is in” at Fox News. They are doing several stories today about the illegal immigrant children streaming through the Southern Border.
But Fox News is refusing to call them “illegal immigrants” they are calling them “undocumented immigrants” or “undocumented children”. The Fix is In at Fox News, they are pushing the liberal agenda on immigration by using the liberal terminology. The are illegals, not “undocumented”.
They must be under orders from Murdoch, who is a big booster of Immigration “reform” also known as amnesty.