Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big Bang Mistake? Scientists Backtrack on Breakthrough Claims
News Max ^ | June 20 2014 | News Max

Posted on 06/20/2014 11:53:10 AM PDT by PoloSec

Scientists who claimed in March they had a major discovery about the Big Bang are now saying they might have made a mistake.

The Associated Press said that in a paper published Thursday, the researchers stood by their initial conclusion — that they had found long-sought evidence for a rapid ballooning of the universe a split-second after its birth.

Urgent: Do You Approve Or Disapprove of President Obama's Job Performance? Vote Now in Urgent Poll

But they said they could not rule out the possibility that a crucial signal they believe came from deep in the cosmos was actually caused by dust in the Milky Way galaxy. If true, their claim for detecting the evidence of so-called cosmic inflation right after the Big Bang would evaporate.

The March announcement was big news because it appeared to provide evidence for the inflation theory, which is widely believed by scientists. The theory says the universe expanded extremely quickly when it was far less than one-trillionth of a second old.

Using data from a telescope at the South Pole, the research team said it had found a specific pattern in light waves within the faint microwave glow left over from the Big Bang. That pattern had long been considered evidence of inflation. John Kovac of Harvard, leader of the collaboration, called it "the smoking-gun signature of inflation."

But since the announcement, some other scientists have published analyses that suggested the signal may have actually come from Milky Way dust.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bazinga; bigbang

1 posted on 06/20/2014 11:53:10 AM PDT by PoloSec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
But they said they could not rule out the possibility that a crucial signal they believe came from deep in the cosmos was actually caused by dust in the Milky Way galaxy.

I think the data was on Lerner's hard drive.

2 posted on 06/20/2014 11:55:44 AM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Too funny. It’s like when on Big Bang Theory that Sheldon thought he had discovered evidence of monopoles when it was just electromagnetic noise from the can opener.


3 posted on 06/20/2014 11:57:59 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

The original claim wasn’t “this is evidence of the Big Bang”.

The original claim was “this is evidence for cosmic inflation”.

Just to be clear.


4 posted on 06/20/2014 11:58:38 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

“Urgent: Do You Approve Or Disapprove of President Obama’s Job Performance? Vote Now in Urgent Poll “

?


5 posted on 06/20/2014 11:58:45 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

“What difference does it make... now?”

Or, even if logically consistent, is it a testable hypothesis?


6 posted on 06/20/2014 12:02:40 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

This science is unsettling.


7 posted on 06/20/2014 12:04:10 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Is what a testable hypothesis?


8 posted on 06/20/2014 12:10:54 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
long-sought evidence for a rapid ballooning of the universe a split-second after...

... Pres..ent Obama's Job Performance...

I had suspected all along that the ballooning of the universe was related to his job performance, but this finally confirms it!

9 posted on 06/20/2014 12:15:35 PM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Why don’t they just consider the science settled and move on to more important things. Apparently that’s the new standard for the scientific method.


10 posted on 06/20/2014 12:21:04 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Obviously these guys aren’t climatologists because counterpoints are allowed without being personally destroyed by your Marxist peers.


11 posted on 06/20/2014 12:23:40 PM PDT by navyguy (The National Reset Button is pushed with the trigger finger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

it would be nice if the “97%” of “scientists” hyping the global warming nonsense would admit that their computer models are worthless. But i’m not holding my breath.


12 posted on 06/20/2014 12:42:27 PM PDT by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Inflation, pieces of the Big Bang.

Yes, I know that you can get astronomical data that is consistent with parts of the theory, and I think that’s great. But, at some point, I wonder how much of the theoretically consistent conjectures about what happened in the first 10^-30 seconds of the universe’s evolution becomes “testable.”


13 posted on 06/20/2014 12:49:36 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Cosmic Inflation has nothing on the rates from the federal reserve...


14 posted on 06/20/2014 12:57:33 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Bazinga! :)


15 posted on 06/20/2014 1:04:45 PM PDT by Horkster ("Money will buy most anything in this country - even a Muslim Communist Presidency." - RoadTest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
"saying they might have made a mistake"

NSS!

16 posted on 06/20/2014 1:08:23 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Horkster

http://www.ibtimes.com/stephen-hawking-watch-sheldon-cooper-faint-his-presence-big-bang-theory-video-434604

Sounds like Sheldon...


17 posted on 06/20/2014 1:13:26 PM PDT by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
cosmic inflation right after the Big Bang would evaporate.

And if the inflation lasts longer than 12 hours you should see a doctor.

18 posted on 06/20/2014 1:16:54 PM PDT by Starstruck (If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

The narrowness of many “ scientists’ “ minds is frequently only eclipsed by the magnitude of their ‘mistakes’...


19 posted on 06/20/2014 1:38:26 PM PDT by logi_cal869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

“this is evidence for cosmic inflation”

Inflation into what? Never been clear on what it’s inflating into.


20 posted on 06/20/2014 1:52:27 PM PDT by Larry - Moe and Curly (Loose lips sink ships.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

My memory is a little rusty. But it seems that a couple of physicists—maybe in Kansas—made some sort of breakthrough during the ‘80s or ‘90s and said that it was more of a slow expansion than a big bang.


21 posted on 06/20/2014 2:48:09 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
Something being "testable" is nice, but not absolutely required.

As long as a theory is consistent with all of the known evidence it remains a viable theory.

Since we are unable to make every possible test over every point in space and at every point in time, every theory is to some extent provisional.

Some theories are more likely to be true than others based on the quantity of evidence that supports them, but nothing call a hypothesis or a theory or even those things called Laws are for certain true.

I don't believe that scientists consider data gathered from human created tests to be inherently better than data gathered carefully from naturally occurring phenomena. In a sense, the universe is constantly performing tests from which we can measure results to match against our theories.

This is what is happening with regard to more and more careful analysis of the cosmic background radiation.

22 posted on 06/20/2014 10:42:45 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson