Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Orders Deployed US Sailor To Attend Custody Hearing Or Lose Daughter, Face Arrest
CBS Seattle, Washington ^ | June 20, 2014

Posted on 06/20/2014 5:46:18 PM PDT by tired&retired

Seattle, Wash. (CBS SEATTLE) – A U.S. Navy sailor from Washington State is currently serving on a submarine thousands of miles away in the Pacific Ocean, but a judge has ordered him into an impossible custody scenario: Appear in a Michigan courtroom Monday or risk losing custody of his 6-year-old daughter.

Navy submariner Matthew Hindes was given permanent custody of his daughter Kaylee in 2010, after she was reportedly removed from the home of his ex-wife, Angela, by child protective services. But now a judge has ordered him to appear in court Monday, or risk losing his daughter to his ex-wife in addition to a bench warrant being issued for his arrest, ABC News reports. Hindes’ lawyers argue he should be protected by the Service Members Civil Relief Act, which states courts in custody cases may “grant a stay of proceedings for a minimum period of 90 days to defendants serving their country.”

But the Michigan judge hearing the case, circuit court judge Margaret Noe, disagrees, stating: “If the child is not in the care and custody of the father, the child should be in the care and custody of the mother.”

The judge reiterated that regardless of Hindes’ assignment under the Pacific Ocean, he will appear in court or face contempt of court.

Navy submariner Matthew Hindes was given permanent custody of his daughter Kaylee in 2010, after she was reportedly removed from the home of his ex-wife, Angela, by child protective services.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: cultureofcorruption; feminazism; judicialactivism; kangaroocourt; sailor; savethemales; womynshistorymonth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
Here is a video from a "Woman's History Month of this judge telling her personal life history.... She was a psych major... say no more!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6-LQhc1ZSU

Story is on Drudge....

1 posted on 06/20/2014 5:46:18 PM PDT by tired&retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

More proof that “judges” are really, really stupid these days.


2 posted on 06/20/2014 5:49:38 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Obama's smidgens are coming home to roost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired
This is the battle ax......
3 posted on 06/20/2014 5:50:11 PM PDT by tired&retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

His attorneys should get hold of his congressman immediately. This is complete BS.


4 posted on 06/20/2014 5:50:51 PM PDT by Fast Moving Angel (It is no more than a dream remembered, a Civilization gone with the wind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Words fail me.


5 posted on 06/20/2014 5:51:54 PM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fast Moving Angel

This is where the “Judicial Inquiry & Review Board”, the police body that monitors judges behavior should receive a formal complaint for judicial misconduct against her...


6 posted on 06/20/2014 5:53:16 PM PDT by tired&retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

This is so biased against men that it’s flagrant!

What type of armed services would we have if judges could pull this routine regularly? I would obviously feel the same way if the sexes were reversed here.

This is unacceptable. I wish there was a way this guy’s attorney could get a stay from an appeals court, for 90days to whatever it takes.

This judge should be released from future rulings.


7 posted on 06/20/2014 5:53:45 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

Incredibly stupid judge.


8 posted on 06/20/2014 5:54:25 PM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

You just can’t fight stupid. Another rampaging liberal judge on the loose.


9 posted on 06/20/2014 5:54:53 PM PDT by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

A judge in the Left Coast. What else an one expect? If you want justice, don’t look at the law.


10 posted on 06/20/2014 5:55:18 PM PDT by Dapper 26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

If you listen to her personal rant, you can understand her bias... She should be booted from the bench..


11 posted on 06/20/2014 5:55:26 PM PDT by tired&retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

The “judge” will be overturned (read: b!tch-$lapped) on appeal.


12 posted on 06/20/2014 5:55:40 PM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

In a society of Progressives there is not much you can do for “stupid” other than promote them in the Administration.


13 posted on 06/20/2014 5:55:59 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Surgeon General Warning: Operation of Government Motors vehicles may be hazardous to your health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

Hmm. There is the Soldier’s and Sailor’s Civil relief act that has been around for a long time. It delays most civil actions against deployed servicemen until they return. I don’t know if it would apply in this case but would be shocked if his attorney’s didn’t know about it. It is quite a fundamental statute.


14 posted on 06/20/2014 5:56:38 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

She’s just arbitrarily gifting this to the wife.

I agree with your take on it, although I haven’t listened to it yet.


15 posted on 06/20/2014 5:57:01 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

As the old saying went ... “A” students became Law Professors, “B” Students went into practice, “C” students became Judges.


16 posted on 06/20/2014 5:57:37 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

I used to live in a country where even the dullest jurist would never attempt this. Remember it?


17 posted on 06/20/2014 5:58:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2Million for ANY 2016 pro-2nd Amendment candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

Unless the kid enlisted with him, she’s not in the custody of the person the court assigned her to. I suspect that’s the source of the contempt issue, not his failure to appear.


18 posted on 06/20/2014 6:01:03 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg (Hoaxey Dopey Changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
I don’t know if it would apply in this case but would be shocked if his attorney’s didn’t know about it. It is quite a fundamental statute.

From the article:
Hindes’ lawyers argue he should be protected by the Service Members Civil Relief Act, which states courts in custody cases may “grant a stay of proceedings for a minimum period of 90 days to defendants serving their country.”

Unless the Judge is deaf...she probably knows and simply doesn't care...

She is a black robed tyrant after all...probably thinks she is above the law..

19 posted on 06/20/2014 6:03:57 PM PDT by Popman ("Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God" - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

The Act most likely wouldn’t apply in a situation where the court’s order is being violated and the violation will continue if the hearing is put off. It’s handy for things like contract issues, etc.


20 posted on 06/20/2014 6:07:00 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg (Hoaxey Dopey Changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson