Skip to comments.8 Signs That ISIS Will Strike in the U.S. Soon (Several Videos)
Posted on 06/21/2014 9:30:39 AM PDT by PoloSec
(If you go to the site, you might want to mute the sound on the first VIDEO, it is accompanied by Islamic song.)
The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) doesnt have designs on just Iraq and Syria. It has published maps in which its envisioned Islamic state encompasses not just those two countries, but also Kuwait, Jordan, Lebanon, Cyprus, parts of Turkey, and (of course) Israel. But it doesnt stop there, either. Clearly ISIS plans to mount jihad terror attacks in the United States and there are numerous indications that such an attack could come sooner rather than later. 8. ISIS jihadi from UK calls for jihad attacks on British civilians to avenge Muslimas murder
Last Wednesday, a jihadist calling himself Abu Rashash Britani, who claims to be from Britain and now waging jihad with ISIS, expressed outrage on Twitter at the recent murder in Britain of a Muslim woman, Nahid Almanea. Britani ranted: These kuffar getting out of hand, dare they touch a Muslimah. I call upon any brother to take up a knife and kill as they did [in] Colchester. Muslim sister killed by kuffar in UK. Allahu Mustahan [Allah is the one whose help is sought]. Where is the outcry by media? oh yeah she was a Muslim.
In the U.S., meanwhile, groups like the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and Georgetown Universitys Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding energetically spread the myth that Muslims in the U.S. are routinely victimized by Islamophobic discrimination, harassment and attacks. How long before ISIS calls for revenge attacks here as well as in Britain?
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
ISIS = the final Caliphate.
Paganism by any other name....
for LIV Obamadrones who love the tasty tops of Barry's mink slippers - THAT MEANS HE'S GREENLIGHTING HIS FRIENDS
This is all nonsense.
All terrorism is generated by and under the control of new world order elites.
We see a long parade of one group or another, but they’re all essentially the same thing: a murky group that can be used to foment problems, which then rationalize the use of the US covert operations and overt military force to go in and hammer somebody or something.
And all this hammering is about serving the global financial elites, who want their own puppets replaced with new puppets.
Or they want their opium operations protected and increased or shifted around the globe a bit.
Or they want to provide fodder for the news media to keep up their public opinion-forming programs aimed at confiscating all guns from Americans.
Or some other similar diabolical plan, typically involving bureaucrats, the CIA, media, drugs, guns, slaves, etc.
But they all run “foundations”, they’re “benevolent”, you see. All that global monopoly business is long over, you see. Their big monopoly companies are “publicly-held”, you know, so everything is ok.
Should be pointed out that this attitude is identical to that of a Jim Crow/KKK type. Gotta keep the _____s in their place!
Ahh, the solace of belief in a secret organization in control of the world!
To make everything OK, all we need to do is expose and overthrow them.
The fact of a world where nobody is really in control is much more scary.
Oh that’s over there. It isn’t in our interest... /s
So. You think America would collapse and surrender to Islamist domination if they just launch a few terror strikes on us?
The fact of the matter is that, even if united in a Caliphate, the Muslim world does not have anything close to capability of overwhelming us militarily, even if we were to leave nukes out of the equation.
The most obvious non-nuclear military fact being that North America is an island, and the US Navy dominates the world's seas more thoroughly than any Navy in history. Invasion and conquest of North America would first require getting past the Navy.
Are you trolling for a knock on your door?
Those are great!
Well I suppose as long as it’s your city and not mine - Si! Se Puede!
Simple fact, the world’s financial elites plan wars.
Wars don’t just “happen”.
Heads of State listen to their advisors. The advisors are all directly related in their whole employment history to the elite’s organizations, i.e., their foundations, companies, law firms, etc. There are no outsiders at the top level. There are no outsiders at the top level. That should be troubling to anyone who understands the implications.
It does not take, for example, much reading and analysis to see a conflict of interest in the career of Henry Kissinger and his relationship with Rockefeller interests. It’s painfully obvious that even his many decades of diplomatic jobs, Kissinger has always worked for the Rockefellers. Ergo, US foreign policy is that of the Rockefeller interests.
I admit that if one does not know any details of the relationship it sounds outlandish. But once one gets into the details, everywhere you turn there are disturbing facts of history.
And that’s just America; the same type of arrangements are present in the UK and Europe.
We’re not “represented” by our elected politicians, we are ruled by them. The politicians always do what financial elites want, thus the elites can rule us sheeple through their vassal politicians.
Expose them, overthrow them ? That seems inconceivable at this point. People are just beginning to pull their head out of the sand. Most are ignorant of the real ways of the world.
What if they just conquer us from they inside with Obama leading them?
Right. The NWO was active in the 7th century and brought about Islam.
ISIS will be in Kuwait within a year.
And they just keep coming and building mosques all over America.
M1A .308, magazine after magazine...
good bet they will prove their street cred with an attack soon. They are well organized and when they hit—lots of folks going to die. What will Obama do—ZIP.
I think ISIS, as such, is one of the less likely groups to attack the US here. They are ideologically focused on attacking Shia and insufficiently fanatical Sunnis more than infidels. Their notion is to unite Islam first, as bloodily as possible, then turn the united forces of Islam on the Great Satan.
A quite literally insane plan. The disproportion of forces is far greater between Unitd Islam and the United States than it was between the USA and Japan in 1941.
However, I think your basic argument is correct. The successes of ISIS will encourage jihadists of various types around the world to attack America and Americans.
A strong Conservative is made when a liberal is mugged. Let’s hope if ISIS does attack the US ( I don’t wish for it but if the inevitable occurs)then it will likely be in an area of the country where gun control is strict and personal protection is of no importance to the politicians. OTOH if they attack a Red state then wish for harm to come to them from CCW owners.
Yeah, I need one of them as well.
Sure would be cheaper at the range.
May all Jihadists ride the steel-Mare, of fame from the movie “The Vikings.”
Obama’s agenda is to never let a crisis go to waste. A terror attack against the US in his mind is a perfect crisis.
No, but I am pretty disgusted with our overlords.
>> Were not represented by our elected politicians, we are ruled by them.
I don’t necessarily agree with your take on elitist control — Sherman Logan’s chaos concern seems more plausible — but truly indeed, we are NOT represented by those elected to office.
At this point any excuse to get this show going is fine with me, I don’t care who starts it.
I say again, this is exactly what Dinesh D’Souza warned us about in “2016: Obama’s America”. Glenn Beck has been exonerated as well, turns out he wasn’t so crazy on this after all.
Obama sees himself as the head of the North American caliphate.
I couldn’t read the cursive Pig Latin.
ISIS attacks USA—Obama will use it to cancel the elections in November! He will promiss to restore them next year but never will. Due to the crisis he will ban the 2016 election and rule as a 3rd Term (maybe changing the VP to Hillary)—Harry Reid will support this move. An accident will happen to Ted Cruz and Sarah Palin-—a plane will go down (hit by a drone)—such things will happen to all who disagrees with Obama. Maybe I should change to decafe!
Food for thought...
It’s been quite a while since I spoke with Valerie Jarrett like Rupert Murdoch recently did.
My own Congressman is Scott Garrett. Very conservative, relatively speaking. But if a bunch of small business folks from my district give feedback to his office, and a he actually makes some moves on existing legislation or even presents his own bill, and this contains our local suggestions from us “sheeple”, by the time it passes into law - our wording will be squashed. What started out as being beneficial for small business will be twisted and contorted by poor Mr. Garrett and the rest of Congress into serving the interests of the elites - against the interests of us sheeple. I’m not even really saying it’s his “fault” per se, because if he constistently thwarted the efforts of the elites of this country, he’d be quickly gone from Congress. Perhaps he is really trying. But the influence of the elites’ “experts” is what rules the offices of members of Congress.
I haven’t tried getting one of my toadies elected to Congress yet, but somehow I don’t think that’s too realistic.
So... I see no evidence of “representation” of the sheeple in my district - whatsoever. And that’s with one of the best members of Congress.
As far as being “ruled”, I’ve yet to find any way to not be subject to the laws of this land. It’s difficult as a sheeple to not be subject to the laws of this land - it’s never been successfully achieved by a sheeple.
Of course, the elites are never subject to such a silly thing as the law; they’re only subject to doing the will of the master elites. Within those boundaries, they can do as they please. The law is just a minor inconvenience for the elites, which they let their lawyers handle.
But us sheeple are ruled by the law. The laws are created by our politicians. And our politicians’ laws are always in favor of the elites and they are increasingly actually against the interests of the sheeple.
Of course, the laws are always touted to be in the interest of the sheeple, but a careful understanding of the fine print reveals exactly the opposite.
The elites have simply allowed us sheeple a long leash for quite some time. They appear to be increasingly more blatantly anti-sheeple nowadays.
Representatives, as a group, like just about everybody else in the world, put what they see as their own interests ahead of everybody else's.
A representative's most important self-interest is in re-election. If those he is representing make it perfectly clear to him that certain positions will greatly reduce his chance of re-election, that position will quickly be dropped.
This is, to my mind, most obviously seen in the erosion of support in Congress for "gun control" in the last few decades. A few decades back, gun control was a consensus position, and only those from truly conservative districts opposed it strongly.
As public opinion has shifted on the issue, so did that in Congress. While it is probable reps from mildly right to mildly left districts still personally would like to see gun control passed, they are unwilling to imperil re-election by voting that way. So today only reps from truly liberal districts are willing to vote for gun control.
Most reps don't want to offend their constituents on either side of this issue, which is why gun control measures tend to not make it to an up or down vote.
The reason this has worked is not that reps really care about public opinion. If they did they'd pay equal attention to public opinion on other issues such as immigration.
It happened because the NRA and other grass-roots organizations were able to mobilize that public opinion into effective pressure groups that would actually swing elections. This is why the Left hates the NRA so much, opposing it and the public opinion it represents really will lose politicians elections.
For conservatives to be equally effective on other issues, such as immigration, where public opinion is on our side, requires similar organization. The problem is that mobilizing such effective grass roots support requires not just public opinion in its favor, it requires intense public opinion. That is present in the case of gun freedoms. Not so much with regard to immigration.
Something may be going down now.
There is now, basically no aircraft traffic versus a lot in the past week in the Baghdad area and airport.
In the past week, there has been a constant flow of north and south bound passenger and freight planes over Baghdad a little east and flying into the airport for landings and takeoffs.